Skip to main content

Reflections of Aesthetic Culture Composed by Cultural Memory on the Urban Space

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Conservation of Architectural Heritage

Abstract

The method used in this study comprises of creating a literature research based on the concepts of culture, memory, cultural memory, aesthetics, art as the expression of aesthetics, and aesthetic culture and building a series of conceptual frameworks of aesthetics of urban space as a result of this reading and examining process. The approach that makes the basic proposition of this study is that “the examination of the physical structure that generates the general appearance of a city is insufficient to define urban aesthetics.” While the process and outcomes of the elements directing our culture, such as “social justice, quality of life, and ghettoization,” are the most prominent problems to be solved, we should prefer “innovative” attitudes, behaviors, methods, and means rather than “new” ones for development. Memory provides cultural transfer in every matter together with reminiscence. Cultural memory derives from customs and communication but is not identified by them. While human, capital, and culture mobilization are gaining impetus with globalization, cultural memory elements have become a consumption material and amnesia has risen. When we consider the relations between modernity and memory, we observe a constant progress and “memorylessness.” The real world that has no relation to an ideal has no aesthetical value. When the existence of aesthetics is considered, “criticism must be a vision of the world and a philosophical method.” This does not happen at a moment’s notice. Aesthetic perception is a kind of perception that discovers the infinite secret force that belongs to the object. We flourish as we perceive the richness of our surroundings. Besides, the most ethical judgment is aesthetic judgment. This is the sign that shows how important the concept of aesthetics is in our lives. Although we say there is a relative independence for aesthetic value, it can be a means of exploitation against the pragmatic value of the object it belongs to. In this respect, art as the carrier of cultural memory renews itself for the notion of building the ideal rather than rebuilding the reality. Spatial creations with applied arts reveal not only the technical improvement of a society but also the lifestyle, way of thinking, vision, understanding the ideals, and psyche of different social layers. Aesthetic culture is our way of life, reflected in urban space, that has been passed to us from our ancestors, is revealing our attitude and behaviors toward our surroundings naturally and unconsciously, by the summation of social experience, and is produced socially by our mental structure. Globalization threatens our cultural memory, and the culture industry jeopardizes our aesthetic culture. That’s why, urban aesthetics is under threat. Under these circumstances, reaching the ideal for aesthetics of urban spaces, based on today’s quality of life, the “unique” creativity in the reality of time with fictions, made with the help of art, embracing the self without denying universality, far from individual profit, in accordance with social decisions, must be inevitable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Williams, R., (2013). Kültür ve Materyalizm, Sel Yayıncılık, İstanbul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moussavi, F., (2011). Biçimin İşlevi, Yem Yayınevi, İstanbul. (Function of Style).

    Google Scholar 

  • Güvenç, B., (1991). İnsan ve Kültür, Remzi Kitabevi, İstanbul. (Human and Culture).

    Google Scholar 

  • http://www.kulturelbellek.com/kultur-nedir-kultur-tanimi-ve-kulturun-ozellikleri/, 21 Mart 2016.

  • Williams, R., (2007). Anahtar Sözcükler, İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul. (Keywords).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oğuz, E., (2011). “Toplum Bilimlerinde Kültür Kavramı”, Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 28 (2): 123–139. (“Concept of Culture in Social Sciences”, Journal of Faculty of Education).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, P. ve Wertsch, J. V., (2015). Zihinde ve Kültürde Bellek, Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, İstanbul. (Memory in Mind and Culture).

    Google Scholar 

  • Assmann, J., (2015). Kültürel Bellek, Ayrıntı Yayınları, İstanbul. (Cultural Memory).

    Google Scholar 

  • Özak, N., Gökmen, G., (2009). “Bellek ve Mekân İlişkisi Üzerine Bir Model Önerisi”, İTÜ Dergisi, 2 (8): 145–155. (“A Modal Proposal on Memory-Space Relationship” Journal of İstanbul Technical University).

    Google Scholar 

  • DesJardins, J. R., (2006). Çevre Etiği, İmge Kitabevi Yayınları, Ankara. (Environmental Ethics).

    Google Scholar 

  • İlhan, M., (2015).” Gelenek ve Hatırlama: Belleğin Kültürel Olarak Yeniden İnşası Üzerine Bir Tartışma”, Diller İçin Uluslararası Dergisi, 10 (8): 139–140. (“Tradition and Remembering: A Discussion on Cultural Reconstruction of Memory” Int. For Languages Journal).

    Google Scholar 

  • Traverso, E., (2009). Çev: Ergüden, I., Geçmişi Kullanma Kılavuzu, Versus Kitap, İstanbul. (User Manual for History).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aksungur, U., (2010). Kent Kültürünün Oluşmasında ve Canlandırılmasında Somut Olmayan Kültürel Miras Unsurları: Edirne Örneği, Uzmanlık Tezi, T.C. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Araştırma ve Eğitim Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara. (Elements of Intangible Cultural Heritage in Creation and Revival of Urban Culture: Example of Edirne, Dissertation, Republic of Turkey Ministry of Culture and Tourism General Directorate of Research and Education).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pösteki, N., Sinema Salonlarının Dönüşümünde Bellek ve Mekan İlişkisi, http://akademikpersonel.kocaeli.edu.tr/nposteki/bildiri/nposteki31.05.2013_00.54.44bildiri.pdf, 1 Nisan 2016.

  • Jacobs, J., (2011). Büyük Amerikan Şehirlerinin Ölümü ve Yaşamı, Metis Yayıncılık, İstanbul. (Life and Death of Great American Cities).

    Google Scholar 

  • Landry, C., (2012). The Art Of City Making, Earthscan, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, M., (2009). Estetik ve Sanat Notları, Karakalem Kitabevi Yayınları, İstanbul. (Notes on Aesthetics and Art).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, A., (2014). Hafızanın Sokakları, Koç Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul. (Streets of Memory).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziss, A., (1984). Gerçekliği Sanatsal Özümsemenin Bilimi “Estetik”, De Yayınevi, İstanbul. (“Aesthetics” the Science of Artistic Assimilation of Reality).

    Google Scholar 

  • Erzen, J., (2006). Çevre Estetiği, ODTÜ Geliştirme Vakfı Yayıncılık ve İletişim A.Ş., Ankara. (Aesthetics of Environment).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, J., (2012). Estetiğin Huzursuzluğu- Sanat Rejimi ve Politika, Çev: Kılıç, A. U., İletişim Yayıncılık, İstanbul. (Disturbance of Aesthetics – Art Regime and Politics).

    Google Scholar 

  • Koylan, D., (2012), Estetiğin Huzursuzluğu, (Disturbance of Aesthetics).

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, T., (2003). “Kültür Endüstrisini Yeniden Düşünürken”, Cogito Dergisi, (36). (“Rethinking Culture Industry” Cogito Magazine).

    Google Scholar 

  • Giray. K., (2001). Kültürel Bellek ve Estetik Yansımalar, Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi, Ankara. (Cultural Memory and Aesthetic Reflections).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D., (2013). Sosyal Adalet ve Şehir, Metis Yayınları, İstanbul. (Social Justice and the City).

    Google Scholar 

  • Öztop, Ş., (2010), Sanatla Yaşamı Uzlaştırmaya Amaçlayan Öğreti: Estetik, https://www.facebook.com/notes/kitaphaberleri/sanatlaya%C5%9Famiuzla%C5%9Ftirmayaama%C3%A7layan%C3%B6%C4%9Fretiestetik/465406862812/,7 Nisan 2016.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nimet Mert Ağar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mert Ağar, N., Cengiz, H., Kocabaş, A. (2019). Reflections of Aesthetic Culture Composed by Cultural Memory on the Urban Space. In: Hawkes, D., et al. Conservation of Architectural Heritage. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10871-7_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics