Abstract
The seamless integration of national economies within the global order has increased the transnational movement of TNCs from all economic blocks. To date, it is widely accepted that no economy can prosper in isolation. Therefore, the regulatory focus has shifted towards ‘Social Licence to Operate’ (SLO). The majority of countries, utilising either soft or hard laws, ensure that the community’s preferences are considered in corporate policy—and decision-making. To achieve this, some countries impose positive responsibility on company directors, and others mandate spending of a percentage of corporate profit on the development of social infrastructure. This mandatory spending may be imposed on classes of corporations with specific net worth or financial turnover. The SLO has developed as the third facet of governance for TNCs by means of this formal arrangement. This governance arrangement empowers society to determine the extent, and types of social benefit TNCs need to extend to the community.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
These economic blocks indicate groups of countries with similar national economy conditions.
- 2.
Issues like transfer pricing, taxation, etc.
- 3.
TNCs.
- 4.
When TNCs move funds (read as Capital) from one country to another country, the exit country stands to lose local liquidity, employment, and revenue (taxes), etc. On the other hand, during the TNCs’ period of operation the exit country maximizes profit through consumption of local recourses and benefits.
- 5.
Read as Transnational Corporations.
- 6.
This is a contentious problem regarding TNC operation and is further examined in the chapter discussing competition and taxation.
- 7.
This includes abusing a dominant position of market power.
- 8.
Since adoption, addendums were added in 1987 and 1995.
- 9.
Conducting business through associates, alliances, joint ventures, and supply chains.
- 10.
Natural and human resources.
- 11.
https://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/about_the_gc/White_Paper_Principles_SDGs.pdf (last visited Jan 13, 2017).
- 12.
The principles were revised in 2006 based on experience of its operation and stakeholder inputs (see www.equator-principles.com).
- 13.
Developed guidelines for all subsidiaries and associates of TNCs.
- 14.
This act replaced the Indian Companies Act 1956.
- 15.
As Karl Polanyi advocated.
- 16.
Though there was initial resistance from different quarters.
References
Anderson, S. (2006, December). International Regulation of Transnational Corporations. Retrieved 1 August 2016, from: http://www.policyinnovations.org/ideas/policy_library/data/01311/_res/id=sa_File1/
Broad, R., & Cavanagh, J. (1999). Corporate accountability movement: Lessons & opportunities. The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, 23, 151.
Companies Act 2013. (n.d.). Retrieved 14 January 2016, from http://www.mca.gov.in/Ministry/pdf/CompaniesAct2013.pdf
Coonrod, S. (1977). United Nations code of conduct for transnational corporations. Harvard International Law Journal, 18, 273.
Diller, J. M. (2000). Social conduct in transnational enterprise operations: the role of the International Labour Organization. Multinational enterprises and the social challenges of the XXIst century, Roger Blanpain, Ed., Kluwer Law International.
Dube, I. (2010). Environmental governance–Future directions. Chartered Secretary, Special Edition, 1381–1384.
Dube, I. (2011). Is corporate governance the answer to corporate structural failure. US-China Law Review, 8, 413.
Dube, I. (2016). Statutory corporate social responsibility—A philosophical shift in decolonized company law. Chartered Secretary, 46(12), 28–32.
Ghemawat, Pa. (n.d.). The forgotten strategy. Harvard Business Review, 81(November), 76–84.
Hägg, C. (1984). The OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 3(1), 71–76.
Hiller, J. S. (2013). The benefit corporation and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(2), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1580-3.
Human Rights Council, United Nations. (2011). Report of the Special Representative of Secretary-General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, John Ruggie (No. 17th Session, Agenda item 3) (p. 1 to 27). Retrieved from http://www.ohchr.org/documents/issues/business/A.HRC.17.31.pdf
Leipziger, D. (2015). The corporate responsibility code book. Viva Books Publishing.
Lin, L.-W. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in China: Window dressing or structural change? Berkeley Journal of International Law, 28(1), 64–100.
Matten, D., Crane, A., & Chapple, W. (2003). Behind the mask: Revealing the true face of corporate citizenship. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(1), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024128730308.
Maucourant, J., & Plociniczak, S. (2013). The institution, the economy and the market: Karl Polanyi’s institutional thought for economists. Review of Political Economy, 25(3), 512–531.
Melgar, B. H., Nowror, K., & Yung, W. (2011). The 2011 update of the OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises: Balanced outcome or an opportunity missed? Institute of Economic Law Transnational Economic Law research Centre, School of Law, Martin Luther University Halle Wittenberg. Retrieved from http://telc.jura.uni-halle.de/sites/default/files/BeitraegeTWR/Heft112_0.pdf
Mickels, A. (2009). Beyond corporate social responsibility: Reconciling the ideals of a for-benefit corporation with director fiduciary duties in the US and Europe. Hastings International & Comparative Law Review, 32, 271.
Prno, J., & Slocombe, D. S. (2014). A systems-based conceptual framework for assessing the determinants of a social license to operate in the mining industry. Environmental Management, 53(3), 672–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0221-7.
Rojot, J. (1985). The 1984 revision of the OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 23(3), 379–397.
Sauvant, K. P. (2015). The negotiations of the United Nations code of conduct on transnational corporations: Experience and lessons learned. The Journal of World Investment & Trade, 16(1), 11–87.
Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Baumann, D. (2006). Global rules and private actors: Toward a new role of the transnational corporation in global governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(04), 505–532. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200616446.
Social Licence to Operate. (n.d.). Retrieved 14 September 2016, from https://www.sbc.org.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/99437/Social-Licence-to-Operate-Paper.pdf
Summary Report on Geneva Consultations, Geneva, Switzerland, December 4–5, 2007, Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://business-humanrights.org/sites/default/files/reports-and-materials/Ruggie-Geneva-4-5-Dec-2007.pdf
UN Intellectual History Project. (2009, July). Retrieved 18 December 2016, from http://www.unhistory.org/briefing/17TNCs.pdf
United Nations Global Compact. (n.d.). The UN Global Compact Ten Principles and Sustainable Development Goals: Connecting, Crucially. Retrieved from https://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/about_the_gc/White_Paper_Principles_SDGs.pdf
Waagstein, P. R. (2011). The mandatory corporate social responsibility in Indonesia: Problems and implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(3), 455–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0587-x.
World Investment Report 2011: Non-Equity Modes of International Production and Development. (2011). Retrieved 17 December 2016, from http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/wir2011_en.pdf
Zinkin, J. (2004). Maximising the’licence to operate’: CSR from an Asian perspective. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 14, 67.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dube, I. (2019). Transnational Corporations’ Social License to Operate—The Third Facet of Corporate Governance. In: Rahim, M. (eds) Code of Conduct on Transnational Corporations. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10816-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10816-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10815-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10816-8
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)