Skip to main content

Forbidden Directed Minors, Directed Path-Width and Directed Tree-Width of Tree-Like Digraphs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover SOFSEM 2019: Theory and Practice of Computer Science (SOFSEM 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 11376))

  • 692 Accesses

Abstract

There have been many attempts to find directed graph classes with bounded directed path-width and bounded directed tree-width. Right now, the only known directed tree-width-/path-width-bounded graphs are cycle-free graphs with directed path-width and directed tree-width 0. In this paper, we introduce directed versions of cactus trees and pseudotrees and -forests and characterize them by at most three forbidden directed graph minors. Furthermore, we show that directed cactus trees and forests have a directed tree-width of at most 1 and directed pseudotrees and -forests even have a directed path-width of at most 1.

The work of the second author was supported by the German Research Association (DFG) grant GU 970/7-1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This means, in graph \(G'\) the edge e and its two incident vertices u and v are replaced by the vertex w and all other edges in G incident with u or v are adjacent with w in \(G'\).

  2. 2.

    This means, in digraph \(G'\) the edge e and its two incident vertices u and v are replaced by the vertex w and all other edges in G incident with u or v are incident with w in \(G'\).

  3. 3.

    This means, in digraph \(G'\) the cycle C is replaced by the vertex w and all other edges in G incident with a vertex in C are incident with w in \(G'\).

  4. 4.

    A remarkable difference to the undirected tree-width [13] is that the sets \(W_r\) have to be disjoint and non-empty.

References

  1. Bang-Jensen, J., Gutin, G. (eds.): Classes of Directed Graphs. SMM. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71840-8

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Barát, J.: Directed pathwidth and monotonicity in digraph searching. Graphs Comb. 22, 161–172 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. El-Mallah, E., Colbourn, C.J.: The complexity of some edge deletion problems. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. 35(3), 354–362 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Ganian, R., et al.: Are there any good digraph width measures? J. Comb. Theory Ser. B 116, 250–286 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Gurski, F., Rehs, C.: Computing directed path-width and directed tree-width of recursively defined digraphs. ACM Computing Research Repository, abs/1806.04457, p. 16 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gurski, F., Rehs, C.: Directed path-width and directed tree-width of directed co-graphs. In: Wang, L., Zhu, D. (eds.) COCOON 2018. LNCS, vol. 10976, pp. 255–267. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94776-1_22

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Harary, F., Uhlenbeck, G.E.: On the number of husimi trees: I. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 39(4), 315–322 (1953)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnson, T., Robertson, N., Seymour, P.D., Thomas, R.: Directed tree-width. J. Comb. Theory Ser. B 82, 138–155 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Kintali, S., Zhang, Q.: Forbidden directed minors and directed pathwidth. Reseach report (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kintali, S., Zhang, Q.: Forbidden directed minors and Kelly-width. Theor. Comput. Sci. 662, 40–47 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Paten, B., et al.: Cactus graphs for genome comparisons. J. Comput. Biol. 18(3), 469–481 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Paten, B., Earl, D., Nguyen, N., Diekhans, M., Zerbino, D., Haussler, D.: Cactus: algorithms for genome multiple sequence alignment. Genome Res. 21(9), 1512–11528 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Robertson, N., Seymour, P.D.: Graph minors II. Algorithmic aspects of tree width. J. Algorithms 7, 309–322 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Scheffler, P.: Die baumweite von graphen als mass für die kompliziertheit algorithmischer probleme. Ph.D. thesis, Akademie der Wissenschaften in der DDR, Berlin (1989)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolin Rehs .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gurski, F., Rehs, C. (2019). Forbidden Directed Minors, Directed Path-Width and Directed Tree-Width of Tree-Like Digraphs. In: Catania, B., Královič, R., Nawrocki, J., Pighizzini, G. (eds) SOFSEM 2019: Theory and Practice of Computer Science. SOFSEM 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11376. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10801-4_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10801-4_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10800-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10801-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics