Probabilistic Parameterized Polynomial Time
We examine a parameterized complexity class for randomized computation where only the error bound and not the full runtime is allowed to depend more than polynomially on the parameter, based on a proposal by Kwisthout in [15, 16]. We prove that this class, for which we propose the shorthand name PPPT, has a robust definition and is in fact equal to the intersection of the classes paraBPP and PP. This result is accompanied by a Cook-style proof of completeness for the corresponding promise class (under a suitable notion of reduction) for parameterized approximation versions of the inference problem in Bayesian networks, which is known to be PP-complete. With these definitions and results in place, we proceed by showing how it follows from this that derandomization is equivalent to efficient deterministic approximation methods for the inference problem. Furthermore, we observe as a straightforward application of a result due to Drucker in  that these problems cannot have polynomial size randomized kernels unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses to the third level. We conclude by indicating potential avenues for further exploration and application of this framework.
KeywordsParameterized complexity theory Randomized computation Bayesian networks
The author thanks Johan Kwisthout and Hans Bodlaender for sharing insightful remarks in his discussions with them, and also Ralph Bottesch for providing useful comments on an early draft of this paper.
- 2.Cai, L., Chen, J., Downey, R.G., Fellows, M.R.: On the structure of parameterized problem in NP. In: Enjalbert, P., Mayr, E.W., Wagner, K.W. (eds.) Proceedings of STACS 1994, pp. 507–520 (1994)Google Scholar
- 3.Chauhan, A., Rao, B.V.R.: Parameterized analogues of probabilistic computation. In: Ganguly, S., Krishnamurti, R. (eds.) Algorithms and Discrete Applied Mathematics, pp. 181–192 (2015)Google Scholar
- 8.Drucker, A.: New limits to classical and quantum instance compression. Technical report TR12-112, Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity (ECCC) (2014). http://eccc.hpi-web.de/report/2012/112/
- 13.Impagliazzo, R., Wigderson, A.: P = BPP if E requires exponential circuits: derandomizing the XOR lemma. In: Proceedings of STOC 1997, pp. 220–229 (1997)Google Scholar