Abstract
Guided by a sociocultural framework that considers the intersection of people, tools, and settings, we describe research and development aims of a mobile app and the pedagogy supporting its use in outdoor learning. Our research investigates sociomaterial configurations that can influence youths’ observational practices with tablet-mediated collaborative knowledge-building activities. Our work includes field tests with hundreds of learners and seven design-based research (DBR) iterations with 185 consented subjects. We report findings across these iterations of research, which are related to (1) the material conditions of the technology design and redevelopment and (2) the evolving theoretical framework focused on the concepts of scientific talk and practice. This chapter describes how we conducted our iterations of research leading to our trialogical approach to learning. As such, we describe how the materiality of the outdoor setting influenced our work and how various sociomaterial configuration for learning emerged based on our research findings. Implications for tablet-supported collaborative learning and technologically enhanced informal learning are drawn in the conclusion of this chapter.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allen, S. (2002). Looking for learning in visitor talk: A methodological exploration. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, & K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning conversations in museums (pp. 259–304). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A., & Feder, M. (2009). Learning science in informal environments. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
Chen, Y. S., Kao, T. C., & Sheu, J. P. (2003). A mobile learning system for scaffolding bird watching learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), 347359.
Choi, G. W., Land, S. M., & Zimmerman, H. T. (2018). Investigating children’s deep learning of the tree life cycle using mobile technologies. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.020
Cole, M. (1998). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dunleavy, M., & Dede, C. (2014). Augmented reality teaching and learning. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 735–745). New York, NY: Springer.
Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 268–291.
Fenwick, T. (2014). Sociomateriality in medical practice and learning: Attuning to what matters. Medical Education 48(1), 44–52.
Gruenewald, D. A. (2003). The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy of place. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032004003
Hakkarainen, K., & Paavola, S. (2009). Toward a trialogical approach to learning. In Transformation of knowledge through classroom interaction (pp. 65–80). Abingdon: Routledge.
Hsi, S. (2003). A study of user experiences mediated by nomadic web content in a museum. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), 308–319.
Ivarsson, J., Schoultz, J., & Säljö, R. (2002). Map reading versus mind reading. In Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 77–99). Dordrecht: Springer.
Land, S. M., & Zimmerman, H. T. (2015). Socio-technical dimensions of an outdoor mobile learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(2), 229–255.
Leinhardt, G., Crowley, K., & Knutson, K. (Eds.). (2002). Learning conversations in museums. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lim, M., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2005). Science learning and a sense of place in a urban middle school. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(1), 107–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-005-9002-9
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (2013). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lyons, L. (2009). Designing opportunistic user interfaces to support a collaborative museum exhibit. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning-Volume 1 (pp. 375–384). Gothenburg: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Nespor, J. (2013). Tangled up in school: Politics, space, bodies, and signs in the educational process. London: Routledge.
Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Socio-material practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448.
Quintana, C., Reiser, B., Davis, E., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Duncan, R., et al. (2004). A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 337–386.
Rogers, Y., & Price, S. (2008). The role of mobile devices in facilitating collaborative inquiry in situ. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 3(3), 209–229.
Seely, B. J. (2015). Using Narrative-based design scaffolds within a mobile learning environment to support learning outdoors with young children. Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/catalog/26776
Semken, S. (2005). Sense of place and place-based introductory geoscience teaching for American Indian and Alaska Native undergraduates. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(2), 149–157.
Smith, G. (2002). Place-based education: Learning to be where we are. Phi Delta Kappan, 83, 584–594.
Stevens, R., & Martell, S. T. (2003). Leaving a trace: Supporting museum visitor interaction and interpretation with digital media annotation systems. Journal of Museum Education, 28(2), 25–31.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Xun, G. E., & Land, S. M. (2004). A conceptual framework for scaffolding III-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(2), 5–22.
Zimmerman, H. T., & Land, S. M. (2014). Facilitating place-based learning in outdoor informal environments with mobile computers. TechTrends, 58(1), 77–83.
Zimmerman, H. T., Land, S. M., McClain, L. R., Mohney, M. R., Choi, G. W., & Salman, F. H. (2015). Tree Investigators: Supporting families’ scientific talk in an arboretum with mobile computers. International Journal of Science Education, 5(1), 44–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2013.832437
Zimmerman, H. T., Land, S. M., Mohney, M. R., Maggiore, C., Kim, S. H., Choi, G. W., et al. (2015). Using augmented reality to support observations about trees during summer camp. In Proceedings of the Interaction Design and Children (pp. 395–398). Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2771925
Zimmerman, H. T., Land, S. M., Seely, B. J., Mohney, M. R., Choi, G. W., & McClain, L. R. (2014). Supporting conceptual understandings outdoors: Findings from the Tree Investigators mobile project. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference for the Learning Sciences, 2, 1067–1071.
Zimmerman, H. T., McClain, L. R., & Crowl, M. (2013). Understanding how families use magnifiers during nature center walks. Research in Science Education, 43(5), 1917–1938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9334-x
Zimmerman, H. T., Land, S. M., & Jung, Y. J. (2016). Using augmented reality to support children’s situational interest and science learning during context-sensitive informal mobile learning (pp. 101–120). In A. Peña-Ayala (Ed.), Mobile, ubiquitous, and pervasive learning: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 406. (pp. 101–119) Cham, Switzerland: Springer International. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26518—6_4.
Acknowledgments
Our thanks to our funder the Center for Online Innovations in Learning and our two partners, The Arboretum at Penn State and Shaver’s Creek Environmental Center. Appreciation to Fariha Salman (iteration 1: analyst), Lucy McClain (iterations 1–3: analyst and naturalist), Michael R. Mohney (iterations 1–3 and 6: analyst and naturalist), YongJu Jung (iterations 3–5: data wrangler lead and analyst), Jaclyn Dudek (iterations 3–5: recruitment lead, analyst, and lead coder 4–5), Gi Woong Choi (iterations 1–2, 5, and 7: lead iteration 7), Jessica Briskin (iterations 3–5: analyst), Chrystal Maggiore (iterations 3–5 and 7: analyst and naturalist), Soo Hyeon Kim (iterations 3–5: analyst), and Brian J. Seely (iterations 1–7: programmer, analyst, and lead iteration 6). More details on the project are at http://sites.psu.edu/augmentedlearning/.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Toomey Zimmerman, H., Land, S.M. (2019). Sociomaterial Configurations and Resources Supporting Observations in Outdoor Learning: Results from Multiple Iterations of the Tree Investigator Project. In: Cerratto Pargman, T., Jahnke, I. (eds) Emergent Practices and Material Conditions in Learning and Teaching with Technologies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10764-2_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10764-2_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10763-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10764-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)