Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Teaching Pre-clinical Medical Students

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Medical Education in Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine

Part of the book series: Respiratory Medicine ((RM))

  • 792 Accesses

Abstract

Teaching pre-clinical (or pre-clerkship) medical students primarily, although not exclusively, occurs in the classroom setting. Understanding foundational principles of cognitive psychology and learning theory can help educators develop effective learning objectives, lesson plans, and educational interventions for students, particularly as flipped classroom and active teaching strategies are increasingly expected when teaching students in the classroom. Familiarity with the dual process theory of cognition, as well as the concepts of working memory, interference, and dissonance, is important for educators to be able to develop effective teaching sessions for pre-clinical students. Topics and concepts in pulmonary and critical care medicine are particularly suitable for active teaching strategies, as working through problems and applying knowledge to answer questions are appropriate for many respiratory and critical care topics. Specific strategies for employing active teaching for pre-clinical students in the large group setting include peer instruction, the use of audience response systems, think-pair-share, team-based learning, concept maps, and case-based collaborative learning. In the small- or medium-sized group setting, problem-based learning and case-based collaborative learning are educational strategies that can be used to promote inquisitiveness, self-directed learning, and critical thinking skills. Encouraging students to develop critical thinking skills to effectively assess and begin to answer questions in the classroom will help them to become better clinicians and physicians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Friesen N. The lecture as a transmedial pedagogical form: a historical analysis. Educ Res. 2011;40:95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hurst JW. The overlecturing and underteaching of clinical medicine. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1605–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Prober CG, Heath C. Lecture halls without lectures – a proposal for medical education. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1657–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Irby DM, Cooke M, O’Brien BC. Calls for reform of medical education by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching: 1910 and 2010. Acad Med. 2010;85(2):220–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bell SK, Krupat E, Fazio SB, Roberts DH, Schwartzstein RM. Longitudinal pedagogy: a successful response to the fragmentation of the third-year medical student clerkship experience. Acad Med. 2008;83(5):467–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nelson C. What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory? Prog Brain Res. 2008;169:323–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cowan N, Elliott EM, Scott Saults J, Morey CC, Mattox S, Hismjatullina A, Conway AR. On the capacity of attention: its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes. Cogn Psychol. 2005;51(1):42–100.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Matsumoto T. Connectionist interpretation of the association between cognitive dissonance and attention switching. Neural Netw. 2014;60:119–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Thompson BM, Teal CR, Rogers JC, Paterniti DA, Haidet P. Ideals, activities, dissonance, and processing: a conceptual model to guide educators’ efforts to stimulate student reflection. Acad Med. 2010;85(5):902–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. van Merriënboer JJ, Sweller J. Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies. Med Educ. 2010;44(1):85–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. White G. Mental load: helping clinical learners. Clin Teach. 2011;8(3):168–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Croskerry P. Clinical cognition and diagnostic error: applications of a dual process model of reasoning. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009;14(Suppl 1):27–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow. 1st ed. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sun R. Duality of the mind. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Paivio A. Mind and its evolution: a dual coding theoretical approach. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bargh JA. The four horsemen of automaticity: awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. In: Wyer R, Srull T, editors. Handbook of social cognition. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1994. p. 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rylander M, Guerrasio J. Heuristic errors in clinical reasoning. Clin Teach. 2016;13(4):287–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Richie M, Josephson SA. Quantifying heuristic bias: anchoring, availability, and representativeness. Teach Learn Med. 2018;30(1):67–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Croskerry P. From mindless to mindful practice – cognitive bias and clinical decision making. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(26):2445–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Anderson LW, Krathwohl D. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jenicek M, Croskerry P, Hitchcock DL. Evidence and its uses in health care and research: the role of critical thinking. Med Sci Monit. 2011;17(1):RA12–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Lochithea. Baconian reference book: commentarius solutus. Bloomington: iUniverse; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Huang GC, Newman LR, Schwartzstein RM. Critical thinking in health professions education: summary and consensus statements of the Millennium Conference 2011. Teach Learn Med. 2014;26(1):95–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yanchar SC, Slife BD, Warne R. Critical thinking as disciplinary practice. Rev Gen Psychol. 2009;12(3):265–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Coderre S, Mandin H, Harasym PH, Fick GH. Diagnostic reasoning strategies and diagnostic success. Med Educ. 2003;37(8):695–703.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hayes MM, Chatterjee S, Schwartzstein RM. Critical thinking in critical care: five strategies to improve teaching and learning in the intensive care unit. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017;14(4):569–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Hennrikus EF, Skolka MP, Hennrikus N. Applying metacognition through patient encounters and illness scripts to create a conceptual framework for basic science integration, storage, and retrieval. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2018;5:2382120518777770.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Lee A, Joynt GM, Lee AK, Ho AM, Groves M, Vlantis AC, Ma RC, Fung CS, Aun CS. Using illness scripts to teach clinical reasoning skills to medical students. Fam Med. 2010;42(4):255–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gal B, Rubio M, Iglesias E, González P. Evaluation of participatory teaching methods in undergraduate medical students’ learning along the first academic courses. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0190173.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Heudebert GR, Estrada CA. Are all teaching activities valued the same? Their relative worth is in the eye of the beholder. South Med J. 2018;111(8):465–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Carvalho H. Active teaching and learning for a deeper understanding of physiology. Adv Physiol Educ. 2009;33(2):132–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chan ZCY. A systematic review on critical thinking in medical education. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2016;30(1).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Daley BJ, Torre DM. Concept maps in medical education: an analytical literature review. Med Educ. 2010;44(5):440–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Goodstone L, Goodstone MS, Cino K, Glaser CA, Kupferman K, Dember-Neal T. Effect of simulation on the development of critical thinking in asssociate degree nursing students. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2013;34(3):159–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Shinnick MA, Woo MA. The effect of human patient simulation on critical thinking and its predictors in prelicensure nursing students. Nurse Educ Today. 2013;33(9):1062–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Schubert CR. Effect of simulation on nursing knowledge and critical thinking in failure to rescue events. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2012;43(10):467–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Schneider JR, Sherman HB, Prystowsky JB, Schindler N, Darosa DA. Questioning skills: the effect of wait time on accuracy of medical student responses to oral and written questions. Acad Med. 2004;79(10 Suppl):S28–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bligh D. What’s the use of lectures? New York: Jossey-Bass; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Crouch C, Mazur E. Peer instruction: ten years of experience and results. Am J Phys. 2001;69(9):970–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sawatsky AP, Berlacher K, Graieri R. Using an ACTIVE teaching format versus a standard lecture format for increasing resident interaction and knowledge achievement during noon conference: a prospective, controlled study. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:129.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Jones RW. Learning and teaching in small groups: characteristics, benefits, problems and approaches. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2007;35:587–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Cain J, Robinson E. A primer on audience response systems: current applications and future considerations. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;72(4):77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Linton DL, Pangle WM, Wyatt KH, Powell KN, Sherwood RE. Identifying key features of effective active learning: the effects of writing and peer discussion. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2014;13:469–77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Estes TH, Mintz SL, Gunter MA. Instruction: a models approach. 6th ed. London: Pearson; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Morgan H, McLean K, Chapman C, Fitzgerald J, Yousuf A, Hammoud M. The flipped classroom for medical students. Clin Teach. 2015;12(3):155–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Relling AE, Giuliodori MJ. Effect of peer instruction on the likelihood for choosing the correct response to a physiology question. Adv Physiol Educ. 2015;39(3):167–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Giuliodori MJ, Lujan HL, DiCarlo SE. Peer instruction enhanced student performance on qualitative problem-solving questions. Adv Physiol Educ. 2006;30(4):168–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Rao SP, DiCarlo SE. Peer instruction improves performance on quizzes. Adv Physiol Educ. 2000;24(1):51–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Trout MJ, Borges N, Koles P. Modified peer instruction improves examination scores in pharmacology. Med Educ. 2014;48(11):1112–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Vickrey T, Rosploch K, Rahmanian R, Pilarz M, Stains M. Research-based implementation of peer instruction: a literature review. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2015;14(1):es3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Atlantis E, Cheema BS. Effect of audience response system technology on learning outcomes in health students and professionals: an updated systematic review. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(1):3–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Efstathiou N, Bailey C. Promoting active learning using audience response system in large bioscience classes. Nurse Educ Today. 2012;32(1):91–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Styers ML, Van Zandt PA, Hayden KL. Active learning in flipped life science courses promotes development of critical thinking skills. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018;17(3):ar39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Michaelsen LK, Parmelee DX, McMahon KK, Levine RE, Billings DM. Team-based learning for health professions education: a guide to using small groups for improving learning. Sterling: Stylus Publishing; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Burgess AW, McGregor DM, Mellis CM. Applying established guidelines to team-based learning programs in medical schools: a systematic review. Acad Med. 2014;89(4):678–88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Richards J, Schwartzstein R, Irish J, Almeida J, Roberts D. Clinical physiology grand rounds. Clin Teach. 2013;10(2):88–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Krupat E, Richards JB, Sullivan AM, Fleenor TJ Jr, Schwartzstein RM. Assessing the effectiveness of case-based collaborative learning via randomized controlled trial. Acad Med. 2016;91(5):723–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Venance SL, LaDonna KA, Watling CJ. Exploring frontline faculty perspectives after a curriculum change. Med Educ. 2014;48(10):998–1007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. McLaughlin JE, Roth MT, Glatt DM, Gharkholonarehe N, Davidson CA, Griffin LM, Esserman DA, Mumper RJ. The flipped classroom: a course redesign to foster learning and engagement in a health professions school. Acad Med. 2014;89(2):236–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. McLaughlin JE, Griffin LM, Esserman DA, Davidson CA, Glatt DM, Roth MT, Gharkholonarehe N, Mumper RJ. Pharmacy student engagement, performance, and perception in a flipped satellite classroom. Am J Pharm Educ. 2013;77(9):196.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Roach T. Student perceptions toward flipped learning: new methods to increase interaction and active learning in economics. Int Rev Econ Educ. 2014;17(10):74–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Khanova J, McLaughlin JE, Rhoney DH, Roth MT, Harris S. Student perceptions of a flipped pharmacotherapy course. Am J Pharm Educ. 2015;79(9):140.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Pettit RK, McCoy L, Kinney M. What millennial medical students say about flipped learning. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017;8:487–97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Smith JD. Student attitudes toward flipping the general chemistry classroom. Chem Educ Res Pract. 2013;14(4):607–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Schmidt HG. Problem-based learning: rationale and description. Med Educ. 1983;17(1):11–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Bate E, Hommes J, Duvivier R, Taylor DC. Problem-based learning (PBL): getting the most out of your students – their roles and responsibilities: AMEE Guide No. 84. Med Teach. 2014;36(1):1–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Schmidt HG, Rotgans JI, Yew EH. The process of problem-based learning: what works and why. Med Educ. 2011;45(8):792–806.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Wood DF. Problem based learning. BMJ. 2003;326(7384):328–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Hawkins S, Hertweck M, Goreczny A, Laird J. Student expectations of problem-based learning (PBL). Med Teach. 2013;35(6):525.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Al-Azri H, Ratnapalan S. Problem-based learning in continuing medical education: review of randomized controlled trials. Can Fam Physician. 2014;60(2):157–65.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Wijnen-Meijer M, ten Cate OT, van der Schaaf M, Borleffs JC. Vertical integration in medical school: effect on the transition to postgraduate training. Med Educ. 2010;44(3):272–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Roberts DH, Newman LR, Schwartzstein RM. Twelve tips for facilitating Millennials’ learning. Med Teach. 2012;34(4):274–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Smolen P, Zhang Y, Byrne JH. The right time to learn: mechanisms and optimization of spaced learning. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016;17(2):77–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Breckwoldt J, Ludwig JR, Plener J, Schröder T, Gruber H, Peters H. Differences in procedural knowledge after a “spaced” and a “massed” version of an intensive course in emergency medicine, investigating a very short spacing interval. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16(1):249.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Weidman J, Baker K. The cognitive science of learning: concepts and strategies for the educator and learner. Anesth Analg. 2015;121(6):1586–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Jaffar AA. YouTube: an emerging tool in anatomy education. Anat Sci Educ. 2012;5(3):158–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Schmidt T. Informal education of medical doctors on the Internet. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;190:92–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Harvard Medical School, Shapiro Institute Center for Education, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA

    Jeremy B. Richards & Richard M. Schwartzstein

Authors
  1. Jeremy B. Richards
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Richard M. Schwartzstein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Patricia A. Kritek

  2. Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA

    Jeremy B. Richards

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Richards, J.B., Schwartzstein, R.M. (2019). Teaching Pre-clinical Medical Students. In: Kritek, P., Richards, J. (eds) Medical Education in Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine. Respiratory Medicine. Humana, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10680-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10680-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10679-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10680-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation