Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Curating Strangers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Creative Hubs in Question

Part of the book series: Dynamics of Virtual Work ((DVW))

Abstract

After the global financial and economic crisis of 2007–2008, new collaboratively oriented shared flexible workspaces have emerged in cities. These co-working spaces and the associated social practice of co-working exemplify a new form of work organisation for mainly independent freelance workers but increasingly small businesses and remote working employees from companies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, B., Kearnes, M., McFarlane, C., & Swanton, D. (2012). On assemblages and geography. Dialogues in Human Geography,2(2), 171–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avdikos, V., & Kalogeresis, A. (2017). Socio-economic profile and working conditions of freelancers in co-working spaces and work collectives: Evidence from the design sector in Greece. Area,49(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barabasi, A.-L. (2002). Linked: The new science of networks. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (2000). The brave new world of work. Malden: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouncken, R. B., & Reuschl, A. J. (2016). Coworking-spaces: How a phenomenon of the sharing economy builds a novel trend for the workplace and for entrepreneurship. Review of Management Science, OnlineFirst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-016-0215-y.

  • Brown, J. (2017). Curating the “third place”? Coworking and the mediation of creativity. Geoforum,82, 112–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.04.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, T. (2016). Co-working communities: Sustainability citizenship at work. In R. Horne, J. Fien, B. B. Beza, & A. Nelson (Eds.), Sustainability citizenship in cities: Theory and practice (pp. 93–103). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capdevila, I. (2013). Knowledge dynamics in localized communities: Coworking spaces as microclusters. SSRN. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2414121. Accessed 20 August 2015.

  • Capdevila, I. (2014). Different inter-organizational collaboration approaches in coworking spaces in Barcelona. SSRN. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2502816.

  • Capdevila, I. (2015). Co-working spaces and the localised dynamics of innovation in Barcelona. International Journal of Innovation Management, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.1142/s1363919615400046.

  • Castells, M. (2009). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Malden, MA, Oxford: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coworking Manifesto. (2014). Coworking Manifesto (Global—For the world). Retrieved from http://wiki.coworking.com/w/page/35382594/Coworking%20Manifesto%20(global%20-%20for%20the%20world. Accessed 25 May 2017.

  • Dale, K., & Burrell, G. (2008). The spaces of organisation and the organisation of space: Power, identity and materiality at work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daskalaki, M. (2017). Alternative organizing in times of crisis: Resistance assemblages and socio-spatial solidarity. European Urban and Regional Studies, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776416683001.

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deskmag. (2013). The third global coworking survey 2012. Retrieved from http://de.slideshare.net/deskwanted/global-coworking-survey-2012?ref=http://blog.deskwanted.com/. Accessed 28 August 2014.

  • Deskmag. (2017). First results of the 2017 global coworking survey. Retrieved from https://www.dropbox.com/s/8kfdsrtel6hpabd/First%20Results%20Of%20The%202017%20Global%20Coworking%20Survey.pdf?dl=0. Accessed 25 July 2017.

  • Dikeç, M. (2002). Pera peras poros: Longings for spaces of hospitality. Theory, Culture & Society,19(1–2), 227–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorley, S., & Witthoft, S. (2012). Make space: How to set the stage for creative collaboration. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovey, J., Lansdowne, J., Moreton, S., Merkel, J. Pratt, A. C., & Virani, T. E. (2016). Creative hubs: Understanding the new economy. London. Retrieved from https://creativeconomy.britishcouncil.org/media/uploads/files/HubsReport.pdf. Accessed 20 February 2018.

  • Evans, G. (2009). Creative cities, creative spaces and urban policy. Urban Studies,46(5–6), 1003–1040. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009103853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felstead, A., Jewson, N., & Walters, S. (2005). The shifting locations of work. Work, Employment & Society,19(2), 415–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017005053186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferm, J. (2014). Delivering affordable workspace: Perspectives of developers and workspace providers in London. Progress in Planning,93, 1–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N. (2001). Social skill and the theory of fields. Sociological Theory,19(2), 105–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2004). The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, P. C., & Ocejo, R. E. (2015). Brokerage, mediation, and social networks. In C. Jones, M. Lorenzen, & S. Jonathan (Eds.), The oxford handbook of creative industries (pp. 405–420). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnari, S. (2014). Interstitial spaces: Microinteraction settings and the genesis of new practices between institutional fields. Academy of Management Review,39(4), 439–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, L. E., Spreitzer, G. M., & Bacevice, P. A. (2017). Co-constructing a sense of community at work: The emergence of community in coworking spaces. Organization Studies,38(6), 821–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GLA. (2015). London open workspaces. Retrieved from https://www.london.gov.uk/what-we-do/regeneration/places-work. Accessed 15 January 2018.

  • Green, H., & Strange, A. (1999). Managed workspace. Do tenants stay too long? Local Economy, 14(3), 245–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, M. (2017). From careers to atmospheres. CAMEo Cuts #3. Leicester: CAMEo Research Institute for Cultural and Media Economies, University of Leicester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutter, M., & Farías, I. (2017). Sourcing newness: Ways of inducing indeterminacy. Journal of Cultural Economy,10(5), 434–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakonen, M., Kivinen, N., Salovaara, P., & Hirkman, P. (2017). Towards an economy of encounters? A critical study of affectual assemblages in coworking. Scandinavian Journal of Management,33(4), 235–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2017.10.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitching, J., & Smallbone, D. (2008). Defining and estimating the size of the UK freelance workforce. A report for the professional contractors group. Retrieved from http://eprints.kingston.ac.uk/3880/1/Kitching-J-3880.pdf. Accessed 20 August 2015.

  • Krzys Acord, S. (2014). Art installation as knowledge assembly. In T. Zemblyas (Ed.), Artistic Practices: Social Interaction and Cultural Dynamics. (pp. 151–165). London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liegl, M. (2014). Nomadicity and the care of place—On the aesthetic and affective organization of space in freelance creative work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW),23(2), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-014-9198-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lind, M. (2010). The curatorial (2009). In B. K. Wood (Ed.), Selected Maria Lind writing (pp. 63–67). Berlin: Sternberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lugosi, P. (2017). Using abstract concepts in impact-focussed organisational research: An empirical example deploying “hospitality”. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal,12(1), 18–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins, J. (2015). The extended workplace in a creative cluster: Exploring space(s) of digital work in silicon roundabout. Journal of Urban Design,20(1), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2014.972349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merkel, J. (2015). Coworking in the city. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 15(1), 121–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, J. (2007). Creative industry business incubators and managed workspaces: A review of best practice. Planning, Practice & Research, 22(4), 601–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450701770126.

  • Moreton, S. (2013). The promise of the affordable artist’s studio: Governing creative spaces in London. Environment and Planning A, 45(2), 421–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriset, B. (2014). Building new places of the creative economy. The rise of coworking spaces. Paper presented at the 2nd Geography of Innovation International Conference 2014, Utrecht January 23–25. Available at https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00914075/document. Accessed 20 August 2015.

  • Mould, O., Vorley, T., & Liu, K. (2014). Invisible creativity? Highlighting the hidden impact of freelancing in London’s creative industries. European Planning Studies, 22(12), 2436–2455. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.790587.

  • NLA. (2016). WRK/LDN. Shaping London’s future workplaces. London: New London Architecture.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, P. (2012). The culture of curating and the curating of culture(s). Cambridge and London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obstfeld, D. (2005). Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly,50(1), 100–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrino, L. (2013). Coworking: Assessing the role of proximity in knowledge exchange. Knowledge Management Research & Practice,13(3), 261–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rus, A., & Orel, M. (2015). Coworking: A community of work. Teorija in Praksa,52(6), 1017–1038.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salinger, J. H. (2013). Economic development policies through business incubation and co-working: A study of San Francisco and New York city. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10022/AC:P:20748. Accessed 20 August 2015.

  • Schmidt, S., Brinks, V., & Brinkhoff, S. (2014). Innovation and creativity labs in Berlin organizing temporary spatial configurations for innovations. Zeitschrift fuer Wirtschaftsgeographie,58(4), 232–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. (2012). Thinking contemporary curating. New York: Independent Curators International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinuzzi, C. (2012). Working alone together: Coworking as emergent collaborative activity. Journal of Business and Technical Communication,26(4), 399–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spinuzzi, C. (2015). All edge: Inside the new workplace networks. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Surman, T. (2013). Building social entrepreneurship through the power of coworking. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 8(3/4), 189–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. (2006). Re-inventing invention: New tendencies in capitalist commodification. Economy and Society,35(02), 279–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virani, T. E., & Malem, W. (2015). Re-articulating the creative hub concept as a model for business support in the local creative economy: The case of Mare Street in Hackney (Creative Works London Working Paper No. 12). Retrieved from http://www.creativeworkslondon.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/PWK-Working-Paper-12.pdf. Accessed 20 December 2016.

  • von Bismarck, B. (2012). Curating curators. Texte zur Kunst, 22(86), 42–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters-Lynch, J. M., & Potts, J. (2016, April 26). The social economy of coworking spaces: A focal point model of coordination. SSRN. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2712217. Accessed 25 July 2017.

  • Welter, T., & Olma, S. (2011). Das Beta-Prinzip. Coworking und die Zukunft der Arbeit. Berlin: Blumenbar Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • WeWork. (2015). WeWork. Create your life’s work. Retrieved from https://www.wework.com/. Accessed 20 August 2015.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Urban and Regional Planning (ISR), Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Janet Merkel

Authors
  1. Janet Merkel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janet Merkel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. City, University of London, London, UK

    Rosalind Gill

  2. City, University of London, London, UK

    Andy C. Pratt

  3. Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

    Tarek E. Virani

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Merkel, J. (2019). Curating Strangers. In: Gill, R., Pratt, A.C., Virani, T.E. (eds) Creative Hubs in Question. Dynamics of Virtual Work. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10653-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10653-9_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10652-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10653-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation