Skip to main content

Dynamic Social Networks: Exponential Forgetting of Perceived Social Power

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Opinion Dynamics and the Evolution of Social Power in Social Networks

Part of the book series: Springer Theses ((Springer Theses))

  • 868 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter extends the DeGroot–Friedkin model by introducing dynamic network topology, and in particular, issue-varying relative interaction topology (the term “issue” is used interchangeably with “topic”). The dynamic network topology problem is formally defined, with motivating examples provided as to why issue-varying networks are reflective of real-world social networks. Then, the nonlinear contraction analysis framework introduced in Chap. 5 is used to draw a key conclusion: under mild assumptions on the properties of the issue-varying network, each individual’s initial (perceived) social power is forgotten exponentially fast, and in the limit of the issue sequence, each individual’s social power converges to a “unique limiting trajectory” that depends only on the issue-varying network topology. The results in Sect. 5.3 concerning the upper bound on an individual’s social power at equilibrium and convergence rate for a class of topologies are also extended, with obvious modifications due to the dynamic topology. As a special case, periodically-varying topologies are also considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Assumption 6.2 is equivalent to requiring that Assumption 5.1 holds separately for all \(\varvec{C}_p,\, p \in \mathcal {P}\).

  2. 2.

    The sets \(\varDelta _n\), \(\widetilde{\varDelta }_n\), and \(\text {int}(\varDelta _n)\) were defined in Sect. 2.1, and are now redefined for the reader’s convenience: The n-simplex is \(\varDelta _n = \{\varvec{x}\in \mathbb {R}^n : 0 \le \varvec{x}, \varvec{1}_n^\top \varvec{x} = 1 \}\), and \(\widetilde{\varDelta }_n = \varDelta _n \backslash \{ \mathbf {e}_1, \ldots , \mathbf {e}_n \}\) and \(\text {int}(\varDelta _n) = \{\varvec{x}\in \mathbb {R}^n : 0 < \varvec{x}, \varvec{1}_n^\top \varvec{x} = 1 \}\).

  3. 3.

    A well-known set is \(\mathcal {K}(\varvec{1}_n/n)\), the set of \(n\times n\) doubly-stochastic \(\varvec{C}\).

  4. 4.

    Any given \(s\in \mathcal {S}\) can be uniquely expressed by a given fixed positive integer P, a nonnegative integer q, and positive \(p\in \mathcal {P}\), as shown.

  5. 5.

    During the thesis examination process, an examiner has identified an alternative proof, which we summarise here for the interested reader. The existence of \(\varvec{x}^*(s)\) was established in Theorem 6.1. Since \(\varvec{x}(2s+2)\) is also a trajectory, \(\Vert \varvec{x}^*(2s+2) - \varvec{x}^*(2s)\Vert \) converges to 0 exponentially fast. From this, one has that for any \(s \ge 0\) and \(k \in \mathbb {N}\), \(\Vert \varvec{x}^*(s+2k) - \varvec{x}(2s) \Vert \) converges to 0 exponentially fast; that is \(\varvec{x}^*(2s)\) is a Cauchy sequence in \(\bar{\mathcal {A}}\), which must converge to a point, denoted as \(\varvec{z}_1^*\). From Eq. (6.14), and by continuity, \(\varvec{z}_1^*\) must be a fixed point of \(\varvec{F}_1(\varvec{F}_2(.))\). A similar approach shows that \(\varvec{x}^*(2s+1)\) must converge to a point, \(\varvec{z}_2^*\), which must be a fixed point of \(\varvec{F}_2(\varvec{F}_1(.))\).

  6. 6.

    The initial condition vector \(\widehat{\varvec{x}}(0)\) also illustrates the relaxed initial condition assumption.

References

  • Amelkin V, Bullo F, Singh AK (2017) Polar opinion dynamics in social networks. IEEE Trans Autom Control 62:5650–5665

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson BDO, Shi G, Trumpf J (2017) Convergence and state reconstruction of time-varying multi-agent systems from complete observability theory. IEEE Trans Autom Control 62:2519–2523

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson BDO, Ye M (in press) Recent advances in the modelling and analysis of opinion dynamics on influence networks. Int J Autom Comput

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao M, Morse AS, Anderson BDO (2008) Reaching a consensus in a dynamically changing environment: a graphical approach. SIAM J Control Optim 47:575–600

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dandekar P, Goel A, Lee DT (2013) Biased assimilation, homophily, and the dynamics of polarization. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:5791–5796

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Duggins P (2017) A psychologically-motivated model of opinion change with applications to American politics. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 20:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jadbabaie A, Lin J, Morse AS (2003) Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules. IEEE Trans Autom Control 48:988–1001

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jia P, MirTabatabaei A, Friedkin NE, Bullo F (2015) Opinion dynamics and the evolution of social power in influence networks. SIAM Rev 57:367–397

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Chen X, Başar T, Belabbas MA (2017) Exponential convergence of the discrete- and continuous-time Altafini models. IEEE Trans Autom Control 62:6168–6182

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mäs M, Flache A, Kitts JA (2014) Cultural integration and differentiation in groups and organizations. Perspectives on Culture and Agent-Based Simulations. Springer, Berlin, pp 71–90

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mesbahi M, Egerstedt M (2010) Graph Theoretic Methods in Multiagent Networks. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nedić A, Liu J (2017) On convergence rate of weighted-averaging dynamics for consensus problems. IEEE Trans Autom Control 62:766–781

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Proskurnikov A, Matveev A, Cao M (2016) Opinion dynamics in social networks with hostile camps: consensus versus polarization. IEEE Trans Autom Control 61:1524–1536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren W, Beard R (2007) Distributed Consensus in Multi-Vehicle Cooperative Control: Theory and Applications. Springer, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ren W, Beard RW (2005) Consensus seeking in multiagent systems under dynamically changing interaction topologies. IEEE Trans Autom Control 50:655–661

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Shi G, Johansson KH (2013) The role of persistent graphs in the agreement seeking of social networks. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 31:595–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye M, Liu J, Anderson BDO, Yu C, Basar T (2018) Evolution of social power in social networks with dynamic topology. In: IEEE transactions on automatic control. 63(11):3793–3808, November 2018

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mengbin Ye .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ye, M. (2019). Dynamic Social Networks: Exponential Forgetting of Perceived Social Power. In: Opinion Dynamics and the Evolution of Social Power in Social Networks. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10606-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics