Abstract
This chapter introduces the notation to be used in the thesis, and an overview of graph theory. In addition, the DeGroot and Friedkin–Johnsen models are revisited.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
In some literature, and perhaps due to problem context, edge weights are defined so that \(e_{ij}> 0 \Leftrightarrow a_{ij} > 0\). For a given \(a_{ij} > 0\), the direction of the associated edge is therefore reversed from what is detailed in this thesis. The result is that the matrix \(\varvec{A}\) is unchanged, while all edges are drawn in the opposite direction. No issues arise in terms of analysis, other than use of different terminology.
- 2.
See Sect. 2.3.3 for a discussion of how an opinion can be represented as a real number.
References
Bullo F, Cortes J, Martinez S (2009) Distributed control of robotic networks. Princeton University, Princeton
Friedkin NE, Bullo F (2017) How truth wins in opinion dynamics along issue sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114:11380–11385
Friedkin NE, Johnsen EC (1990) Social influence and opinions. J Math Sociol 15:193–206
Friedkin NE, Proskurnikov AV, Tempo R, Parsegov SE (2016) Network science on belief system dynamics under logic constraints. Science 354:321–326
Godsil CD, Royle G (2001) Algebraic graph theory, vol 207. Springer, New York
Hendrickx JM, Shi G, Johansson KH (2015) Finite-time consensus using stochastic matrices with positive diagonals. IEEE Trans Autom Control 60:1070–1073
Nedić A, Liu J (2017) On convergence rate of weighted-averaging dynamics for consensus problems. IEEE Trans Autom Control 62:766–781
Newman M (2010) Networks: an introduction. Oxford University, Oxford
Nowak A, Szamrej J, Latané B (1990) From private attitude to public opinion: a dynamic theory of social impact. Psychol Rev 97:362
Parsegov SE, Proskurnikov AV, Tempo R, Friedkin NE (2017) Novel multidimensional models of opinion dynamics in social networks. IEEE Trans Autom Control 62:2270–2285
Proskurnikov AV, Tempo R (2017) A tutorial on modeling and analysis of dynamic social networks. Part I. Annu Rev Control 43:65–79
Proskurnikov AV, Tempo R, Cao M, Friedkin NE (2017) Opinion evolution in time-varying social influence networks with prejudiced agents. In: IFAC-papersonline. Elsevier, pp 11896–11901
Ren W, Beard R (2007) Distributed consensus in multi-vehicle cooperative control: theory and applications. Springer, London
Yildiz E, Ozdaglar A, Acemoglu D, Saberi A, Scaglione A (2013) Binary opinion dynamics with stubborn agents. ACM Trans Econ Comput 1:19
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ye, M. (2019). Preliminaries. In: Opinion Dynamics and the Evolution of Social Power in Social Networks. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10606-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10606-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10605-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10606-5
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)