Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer Theses ((Springer Theses))

  • 854 Accesses

Abstract

By way of conclusion, the main contributions of this thesis are now summarised and discussed. Possible future research directions are also outlined in Sect. 10.2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In multi-agent systems research, study of single-integrator agents (Abelson and Taylor models) naturally led to research on agents with double-integrator, linear, and then nonlinear dynamics, in an attempt to capture more realistic dynamics of autonomous agents. The motivation here is entirely different, and is driven by social concepts.

References

  • Asch SE (1951) Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. Groups, leadership, and men. Carnegie Press, Pittsburgh, pp 222–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan NJ, Chastain EJ, Vilhena DA, Freudenberg JS, Bergstrom CT (2012) Nodal dynamics, not degree distributions, determine the structural controllability of complex networks. PloS One 7:e38398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedkin NE, Bullo F (2017) How truth wins in opinion dynamics along issue sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114:11380–11385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedkin NE, Johnsen EC (2011) Social influence network theory: a sociological examination of small group dynamics, vol 33. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorden RL (1952) Interaction between attitude and the definition of the situation in the expression of opinion. Am Sociol Rev 17:50–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia P, Friedkin NE, Bullo F (2017) Opinion dynamics and social power evolution: a single-timescale model. arXiv:1712.02452

  • Kuran T (1997) Private truths, public lies: the social consequences of preference falsification. Harvard University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin CT (1974) Structural controllability. IEEE Trans Autom Control 19:201–208

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu F, Morse AS (2017) Structural controllability of linear systems. In: 2017 IEEE 56th annual conference on decision and control (CDC). IEEE, pp 3588–3593

    Google Scholar 

  • Noelle-Neumann E (1993) The spiral of silence: public opinion, our social skin. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachter S (1951) Deviation, rejection, and communication. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 46:190–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor DG (1982) Pluralistic ignorance and the spiral of silence: a formal analysis. Public Opin Q 46:311–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters NL, Hans VP (2009) A jury of one: opinion formation, conformity, and dissent on juries. J Empir Leg Stud 6:513–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye M, Liu J, Anderson BDO (2018) On the effects of heterogeneous logical interdependencies in multi-dimensional opinion dynamics models. In: The 57th IEEE conference on decision and control. pp. 4372–4377, Miami, USA, December 2018

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mengbin Ye .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ye, M. (2019). Conclusions and Future Work. In: Opinion Dynamics and the Evolution of Social Power in Social Networks. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10606-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics