Skip to main content

Single-Stage-to-Orbit Space-Plane Trajectory Performance Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Modeling and Optimization in Space Engineering

Part of the book series: Springer Optimization and Its Applications ((SOIA,volume 144))

  • 1359 Accesses

Abstract

The development of fully reusable launch systems has been the topic of many studies since the 1960s. Over the years, several aspects of both so-called single- and two-stage-to-orbit space planes have provided many interesting research topics. Amongst others, the constrained trajectory optimisation has proven to be a challenging subject. In this chapter, an inverse-dynamics approach is combined with trajectory optimisation and analysis, by discretising a representative (vertical-plane) ascent trajectory into a number of flight segments, and by parametrising the guidance in terms of flight-path angle as a function of altitude. When the individual guidance parameters are varied, the effect on performance indices payload mass and integrated heat load can be analysed. This can subsequently lead to a refinement of the trajectory. To do so with limited effort, design-of-experiment techniques are used. It is shown that with this relatively simple simulation scheme, combined with variance analysis and response-surface methodology, the insight in the trajectory dynamics can be increased. Alternatively, this method can be used as refinement to an otherwise (local) optimum trajectory. It is stressed, though, that the application of design of experiments to the ascent-trajectory problem cannot replace numerical optimisation. Finally, the impact of using thrust-vector control as a means to (partially) trim the vehicle shows significant fuel savings and should therefore be included in the optimisation process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    De Selding, P.B., “SpaceX to launch SES-10 on previously flown Falcon 9 this year”, Spacenews, August 30, 2016. http://spacenews.com/spacex-to-launch-ses-10-satellite-on-reused-falcon-9-by-years-end/. Accessed October 5, 2017.

  2. 2.

    Various alternatives to design of experiments exist, e.g., Latin hypercube sampling [18] or optimised hypercube sampling [19]. Even though potentially efficient methods, it was decided to use a fully deterministic approach that is simple to implement and allows for a structured variance analysis of the results.

  3. 3.

    Variation of k parameters with two (three) possible values, also called levels, results in a total of 2k (3k) combinations.

  4. 4.

    Two design points are said to collapse when one of the design parameters has (almost) no influence on the function value and the two designs differ only in this parameter. As a consequence this means that effectively the same point is evaluated twice, and for deterministic simulation models this is not a desirable situation.

  5. 5.

    The simulation stops after 3000 s, which is about 700 s more than the flight duration of the reference trajectory, so not reaching h = 120 km after this time indicates a vehicle “crash”.

  6. 6.

    Only two factors determine 90% of the variation in integrated heat load, i.e., parameters that determine the shape of the second part of the trajectory where thermal loading is larger.

  7. 7.

    A response surface with only linear terms assumes no interactions or higher-order effects in the response. This may not be true for all ranges of factor variation, but to do so allows for a comparison with the results of ANOVA. Also, the linear factor variation (minimum and maximum values only) allows for a fast analysis during conceptual trajectory design.

  8. 8.

    A batch with factor variations over three levels, allowing to include quadratic effects, has been executed using the L 81 orthogonal array. This array requires 81 simulations for a maximum of 40 independent factors. With the same column assignment as for the L 32-batch, the response surface gives a maximum payload mass of 7895 kg when both linear and quadratic terms are included, and 7899 kg with only linear terms. This analysis confirms the consistency of the approach and shows indeed that quadratic terms have a marginal effect for fitting the surface through the data points.

  9. 9.

    The use of TVC interacted with the flight-path angle steering loop, Equation (5), and some high-frequency, small-amplitude oscillations were induced in the commanded angle of attack. This led to oscillations in the thrust-elevation angle. Without doing a redesign, the gains were set to K γp = 2.0, K γi = 1.8 and K γd = 0 for the complete trajectory, which solved the problem. However, it was observed that changing the gains has a noticeable effect on the fuel mass, so in a future design the gains should be optimised.

References

  1. Dinardi, A., Capozzoli, P., Shotwell, G.: Low-cost launch opportunities provided by the falcon family of launch vehicles. In: The Fourth Asian Space Conference. Taipei (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cribbs, D.: Performance uncertainty analysis for NASP. In: 2nd International Aerospace Planes Conference. Orlando (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lovell, C.K., Schmidt, P.: Mission performance of hypersonic vehicles. In: AIAA Guidance Navigation and Control Conference. Baltimore (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schmidt, D.K., Lovell, T.A.: Mission performance and design sensitivities for hypersonic airbreathing vehicles. J. Spacecr. Rocket. 34(2), 158–164 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wagner, A., Thevenot, R.: STS 2000: a reference air-breathing SSTO. In: AIAA 3rd International Aerospace Planes Conference. Orlando (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Calise, A.J., Flandro, G.A., Corban, J.E.: Trajectory Optimization and Guidance Law Development for National Aerospace Plane Applications. NASA CR-182994. NASA, Washington DC (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Corban, J.E., Calise, A.J., Flandro, G.A.: Rapid near-optimal aerospace plane trajectory generation and guidance. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 14(6), 1181–1190 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Van Buren, M.A., Mease, K.D.: Aerospace plane guidance using time-scale decomposition and feedback linearisation. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 14(6), 1166–1174 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lu, P.: Entry guidance: a unified method. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 37(3), 713–728, (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lu, P.: Inverse dynamics approach to trajectory optimization for an aerospace plane. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 16(4), 726–732 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Hess, R.A., Gao, C., Wang, S.H.: Generalized technique for inverse simulation applied to aircraft maneuvers. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 14(5), 920–926 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Morio, V., Cazaurang, F., Vernis, P.: Flatness-based hypersonic reentry guidance of a lifting-body vehicle. Control. Eng. Pract. 17(5), 588–596 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shaughnessy, J.D., Zane Pinckney, S., McMinn, J.D., Cruz, C.I., Kelley, M.L.: Hypersonic vehicle simulation model: Winged-Cone configuration. NASA Technical Memorandum 102610, Langley Research Center, Hampton, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hattis, P.D., Malchow, H.D.: Evaluation of some significant issues affecting trajectory and control management for air-breathing hypersonic vehicles. In: AIAA Fourth International Aerospace Planes Conference. Orlando (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Powell, R.W., Shaugnessy, J.D., Cruz, C.I., Naftel, J.C.: Ascent performance of an air-breathing horizontal-takeoff launch vehicle. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 14(4), 834–839 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gregory, I.M., Chowdhry, R.S., McMinn, J.D., Shaughnessy, J.D.: Hypersonic vehicle model control law development using H and μ-synthesis. NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vinh, N.X.: Optimal Trajectories in Atmospheric Flight. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Iman, R.L.: Latin hypercube sampling. In: Encyclopedia of quantitative risk analysis and assessment. Wiley, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Park, J.S.: Optimal Latin-hypercube designs for computer experiments. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 39(1), 95–111 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Mooij, E.: Re-entry test vehicle configuration selection and analysis. In: Fasano, G., Pintr, J.D. (eds.) Space Engineering. Modeling and Optimization with Case Studies, pp. 199–235. Springer, Berlin (2016)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Taguchi, G.: System of Experimental Design. Engineering Methods to Optimise Quality and Minimise Costs, 2nd edn, vol. 1. UNIPUB/Kraus International Publications, White Plains (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Phadke, M.S.: Quality Engineering Using Robust Design. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Marée, A.G.M., Mooij, E., Zandbergen, B.T.C.: Space-plane analysis: the generation of a reference trajectory. Report LR-749, Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hattis, P., Malchow, H., Shaughnessy, J., Chowdry, R.: Integrated trajectory and control analysis for generic hypersonic vehicles. In: 3rd International Aerospace Planes Conference, AIAA-1991-5052 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erwin Mooij .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mooij, E. (2019). Single-Stage-to-Orbit Space-Plane Trajectory Performance Analysis. In: Fasano, G., Pintér, J. (eds) Modeling and Optimization in Space Engineering . Springer Optimization and Its Applications, vol 144. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10501-3_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics