Skip to main content

Is an Inquiry-Based Approach Possible at the Elementary School?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mathematical Problem Solving

Part of the book series: ICME-13 Monographs ((ICME13Mo))

Abstract

In this paper, we focus on the inquiry-based approach at the elementary school when students try to resolve mathematics problems. After a brief survey about problem solving, problem posing and inquiry-based learning, we analyze two case studies in the French context with the framework of the learning by problematization (Fabre & Orange in ASTER 24:37–57, 1997) and the notion of potential of inquiry of a problem that we introduce. This way, we identify some conditions of possibilities of learning mathematics with inquiry at elementary French schools. The design of the situation chosen by the teacher, that must conduct students to doubt and enroll them on inquiry, plays a crucial role. The teacher must also be able to support students’ inquiry activity, which may require developing didactical skills through teachers’ training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Artigue, M. (2011). Les défis de l’enseignement des mathématiques dans l’éducation de base. Paris: Unesco édition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artigue, M. (2012). Démarches d’investigation. Réflexions à partir de quelques projets européens. IREM de Lyon. http://www.univirem.fr/IMG/pdf/Demarche_d_investigation_Lyon1_MICHELE_ARTIGUE_11_Juin_2012.pdf.

  • Bachelard, G. (1970). Le Rationalisme appliqué. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balacheff, N. (1987). Processus de preuve et situations de validation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 18(2), 147–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choquet, C. (2014). Une caractérisation des pratiques de professeurs des écoles lors de séances de mathématiques dédiées à l’étude de problèmes ouverts au cycle 3 (Thèse de doctorat, Université of Nantes, France). https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01185671/document.

  • Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York: Henri Holt and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (2011). Démocratie et éducation suivi de Expérience et éducation. Paris: Armand Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douady, R. (1986). Jeux de cadres et dialectique outil-objet. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 7(2), 5–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorier, J.-L., & Garcia, J. (2013). Challenges and opportunities for the implementation of inquiry-based learning in day-to-day teaching. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(6), 837–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeln, K., Euler, M., & Maaß, K. (2013). Inquiry-based learning in Mathematics and science: A comparative baseline study of teachers’ beliefs and practices across 12 European countries. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(6), 823–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erh-Tsung, C., & Fou-Lai, L. (2013). A survey of the practice of a large-scale implementation of inquiry-based mathematics teaching: from Taiwan’s perspective. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(6), 919–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabre, M. (2005). Deux sources de l’épistémologie des problèmes: Dewey et Bachelard. Les Sciences de l’éducation - Pour l’Ère nouvelle, 38(3), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.3917/lsdle.383.0053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabre, M., & Orange, C. (1997). Construction des problèmes et franchissements d’obstacles. ASTER, 24, 37–57. http://ife.ens-lyon.fr/publications/edition-electronique/aster/RA024-03.pdf.

  • Grau, S. (2017). Problématiser en mathématiques: le cas de l’apprentissage des fonctions affines (Thèse de doctorat, Université de Nantes, France).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hersant, M. (2010). Empirisme et rationalité au cycle 3, vers la preuve en mathématiques. Habilitation à diriger des recherches, Université de Nantes. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01777604.

  • Hersant, M. (2014). Facette épistémologique et facette sociale du contrat didactique: une distinction pour mieux caractériser la relation contrat didactique milieu, l’action de l’enseignant et l’activité potentielle des élèves. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 34(1), 9–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hersant, M., & Orange-Ravachol, D. (2015). Démarche d’investigation et problématisation en mathématiques et en SVT: des problèmes de démarcation aux raisons d’une union. Recherches En Education, 21, 95–108. http://www.recherches-en-education.net/IMG/pdf/REE-no21.pdf.

  • Hersant, M., & Perrin-Glorian, M.-J. (2005). Characterization of an ordinary teaching practice with the help of the theory of didactic situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 59(1), 113–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-2183-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hétier, R. (2008). La notion d’expérience chez John Dewey : une perspective éducative. Recherches en Education, 5, 21–32. http://www.recherches-en-education.net/IMG/pdf/REE-no5.pdf.

  • Inoue, N., & Buczynski, S. (2011). You asked open-ended questions, now What? Understanding the nature of stumbling blocks in teaching inquiry lessons. The Mathematics Educator, 20(2), 10–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laborde, C., Perrin-Glorian, M.-J., & Sierpinska, A. (Éd.). (2005). Beyond the apparent banality of the mathematics classroom. Boston, MA: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C., Davis, E. A., & De Bell, P. (2004). Internet environments for science education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malaspina, U. (2016). Problem posing: An overview for further progress. In P. Liljedahl, M. Santos-Trigo, U. Malaspina, & R. Bruder (dir.), Problem solving in mathematics education. ICME 13 Topical Surveys. Springer Open.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maaß, K., & Artigue, M. (2013). Implementation of inquiry-based learning in day-to-day teaching: A synthesis. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(6), 779–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orange, C. (2000). Idées et raisons. Habilitation à Diriger des recherches, Université de Nantes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orange, C. (2005). Problématisation et conceptualisation en sciences et dans les apprentissages scientifiques. Les sciences de l’éducation pour l’ère nouvelle, 38(3), 70–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Shea, J., & Leavy, M. (2013). Teaching mathematical problem-solving from an emergent constructivist perspective: The experiences of Irish primary teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16(4), 293–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrin, D. (2007). L’expérimentation en mathématiques. In Actes du 33è colloque de la Copirelem (pp. 37–72). Dourdan. Available at: http://www.math.u-psud.fr/~perrin/Conferences/L_experimentation_en_maths/PetitxDP.pdf.

  • Poincaré, H. (1970). La valeur de la science. Paris: Champs-Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pólya, G. (1954). Mathematics and plausible reasoning. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pólya, G. (1965). Comment poser et résoudre des problèmes. Paris: Jacques Gabay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocard, M., Csemely, P., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D., Walberg-Henriksson, H., & Hemmo, V. (2007). Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. Bruxuelles. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/report-rocard-on-science-education_en.pdf.

  • Santos-Trigo, M. (2013). Problem solving in mathematics education. In Lerman, S. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 496–501).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A.-H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A.-H., & Kilpatrick, J. (2013). A US perspective on the implementation of inquiry-based learning in mathematics. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45, 901–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, F. M., Ellerton, N., & Cai, J. (2013). Problem-posing research in mathematics education: New questions and directions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9478-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver, E.-A. (1994). On mathematical problem posing. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergnaud, G. (1998). A comprehensive theory of representation for mathematics education. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(2), 167–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Magali Hersant .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hersant, M., Choquet, C. (2019). Is an Inquiry-Based Approach Possible at the Elementary School?. In: Liljedahl, P., Santos-Trigo, M. (eds) Mathematical Problem Solving. ICME-13 Monographs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10472-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10472-6_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10471-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10472-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics