Abstract
The goal in this chapter is to analyze and document ways in which the use of digital technologies provides affordances for teachers/students to develop knowledge and solve mathematical problems. What types of representations and problem explorations appear and characterize a technology enhanced problem-solving approach? What does the systematic and coordinated use of digital technologies bring to the students’ process of delving into problem statements, to the ways of representing and exploring tasks, and to the development of their problem-solving competencies? Four groups of problems are examined to illustrate what strategies and ways of reasoning emerge and are enhanced in a technological problem-solving approach. Focusing on the reconstruction of figures that often appear in problem statements, the transformation of a routine problem into an investigation task, the representation and exploration of a variation phenomenon task, and the construction of a dynamic configuration to pose and pursue questions shed lights on ways to frame a problem-solving approach that fosters and values the use of digital technologies. The discussion of these types of problems might provide students an opportunity to pay attention to and develop ways of reasoning that include the construction of dynamic models, the controlled movement of some model elements, the search and exploration of loci of points or lines to analyze some variation phenomena, the use of sliders to control parameters to delve into concepts, and to examine object attributes to formulate, validate, and support conjectures.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barbeau, E. (2009). Introduction. In E. J. Barbeau, P. J. Taylor (Eds.), Challenging mathematics in and beyond the classroom (p. 97). New ICMI Study Series 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09603-2. New York: Springer.
Blaschke, L. M., & Hase, S. (2016). A holistic framework for creating twenty-first-Century self-determined learners. In B. Gros et al. (Eds.), The future of ubiquitous learning. Learning design for emerging pedagogies (pp. 25–40). New York: Springer.
Connected Geometry. (2000). Developed by Educational Development Center, Inc., Chicago Illinois: Everyday Learning.
Freiman, V., Kadijevich, D., Kuntz, G., Pozdnyakov, S., & Stedoy, I. (2009). Technological environments beyond the classroom. In E. J. Barbeau & P. J. Taylor (Eds.), Challenging mathematics in and beyond the classroom (p. 97). New ICMI Study Series 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09603-2_4. New York: Springer.
Gros, B. (2016). The dialogue between emerging pedagogies and emerging technologies. In. B. Gros, et al. (Eds.). The future of ubiquitous learning. Learning design for emerging pedagogies (pp. 3–23). New York: Springer.
Gros, B., Kinshuk, & Maina, M. (2016). Preface. In B. Gros, Kinshuk, & M. Maina (Eds.), The future of ubiquitous learning. Learning design for emerging pedagogies (pp. v–x). New York: Springer.
Hokanson, B., & Gibbons, A. (Eds.). (2014). Design in educational technology. Design thinking, design process, and the design studio. London: Springer.
Kinshuk, R. H., & Spector, J. M. (Eds.). (2013). Reshaping learning. Frontiers of learning technologies in a global context. New York: Springer.
Leikin, R., Koichu, B., Berman, A., & Dinur, S. (2017). How are questions that students ask in high level mathematics classes linked to general giftedness? ZDM Mathematics Education, 49, 65–80.
Lester, F. K., & Cai, J. (2016). Can mathematical problem solving be taught? Preliminary answers from 30 years of research. In P. Felmer, et al. (Eds.), Posing and solving mathematical problems (pp. 117–135). Research in Mathematics Education. Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28023-3_8.
Leung, A. (2008). Dragging in a dynamic geometry environment through the lens of variation. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 13, 135–157.
Leung, A. (2011). An epistemic model of task design in dynamic geometry environment. ZDM Mathematics Education, 43, 325–336.
Leung, A. (2017). Exploring techno-pedagogic task design in the mathematics classroom. In A. Leung & A. Baccaglini-Frank (Eds.), Digital technologies in designing
mathematics education tasks (pp. 3–16). Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43423-0_1.
Leung, A., & Baccaglini-Frank, A. (2017a). Digital technologies in designing mathematics educational tasks. Potential and pitfalls. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43423-0.
Leung, A., & Baccaglini-Frank, A. (2017b). Introduction. In A. Leung & A. Baccaglini-Frank (Eds.), Digital technologies in designing mathematic education tasks (pp. vii–xvi). Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43423-0.
Leung, A., & Bolite-Frant, J. (2015). Designing mathematics tasks: The role of tools. In A. Watson, M. Ohtani (Eds.), Task design in mathematics education (pp. 191–225). Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09629-2_6.
Liljedahl, P., Santos-Trigo, M., Malaspina, U., & Bruder, R. (2016). Problem solving in mathematics education. ICME-13 Topical Surveys. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40730-2_1.
Margolinas, C. (2013). Task design in mathematics Education. In Proceedings of ICMI Study 22 (hal-00834054v2).
Mason, J. (2016). When is a problem…? “When” is actually the problem! In P. Felmer, et al. (Eds.), Posing and solving mathematical problems (pp. 263–283). Research in Mathematics Education. Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28023-3_8.
Mason, J., Burton, L., & Stacy, K. (2010). Thinking mathematically (2nd ed.). New York: Pearson.
Melzak, Z. A. (1983). Invitation to geometry. NY: Dover.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
Moreno-Armella, L., & Santos-Trigo, M. (2016). The use of digital technologies in mathematical practices: Reconciling traditional and emerging approaches. In L. English & D. Kirshner (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (3rd ed., pp. 595–616). New York: Taylor & Francis.
Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Reyes-MartĂnez, I. (2016). The design and results of implementing a learning environment that incorporates a mathematical problem-solving approach and the coordinated use of digital technologies (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Mathematics Education Department, Cinvestav-IPN, Mexico.
Santos-Trigo, M. (2007). Mathematical problem solving: An evolving research and practice domain. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 39(5, 6), 523–536.
Santos-Trigo, M. (2014). Problem solving in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 496–501). New York: Springer.
Santos-Trigo, M., & Camacho-MachĂn, M. (2016). Digital technologies and mathematical problem solving: Redesigning resources, materials, and extending learning environments. In K. Newton (Ed.), Problem-solving: Strategies, challenges and outcomes (pp. 31–49). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Santos-Trigo, M., & Moreno-Armella, L. (2016). The use of digital technologies to frame and foster learners’ problem-solving experiences. In P. Felmer, et al. (Eds.), Posing and solving mathematical problems (pp. 189–207). Research in Mathematics Education. Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28023-3_8.
Santos-Trigo, M., Moreno-Armella, L., & Camacho-MachĂn, M. (2016a). Problem solving and the use of digital technologies within the Mathematical Working Space framework. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48, 827–842.
Santos-Trigo, M., & Reyes-MartĂnez, I. (2018). High school prospective teachers’ problem-solving reasoning that involves the coordinated use of digital technologies. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2018.1489075.
Santos-Trigo, M., Reyes-MartĂnez, I., & Aguilar-MagallĂłn, D. (2016). Digital technologies and a modeling approach to learn mathematics and develop problem solving competencies. In L. Uden, D. Liberona, & B. Feldmann (Eds.), Learning technology for education in cloud (pp. 193–206). Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-31942147-6_18.
Santos-Trigo, M., & Reyes-RodrĂguez, A. (2016). The use of digital technology in finding multiple paths to solve and extend an equilateral triangle task. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(1), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1049228.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. New York: Academic Press.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. A. Grows (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). New York: Macmillan.
Selden, A., Selden, J., Hauk, S., & Mason, A. (2000). Why can’t calculus students access their knowledge to solve non-routine problems? CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education, 8, 128–153.
Silver, E. A. (1990). Contribution of research to practice: Applying findings, methods, and perspectives. In T. Cooney & C.R. Hirsch (Eds.), Teaching and learning mathematics in the 1990s. 1990 yearbook (pp. 1–11). Reston VA: The Council.
Silver, E. A. (2016). Mathematical problem solving and teacher professional learning: The case of a modified PISA mathematics task. In P. Felmer, et al. (Eds.), Posing and solving mathematical problems (pp. 345–360). Research in Mathematics Education. Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28023-3_8.
Singer, F. M., Ellerton, N. F., & Cai, J. (Eds.). (2015). Mathematical problem posing. From research to effective practice. London: Springer.
Stanic, G., & Kilpatrick, J. (1988). Historial perspectivas on problem solving in the mathematics curriculum. In R. I. Charles & E. A. Silver (Eds.), The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving (pp. 1–22). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Törner, G., Schoenfeld, A. H., & Reiss, K. M. (2007). Problem solving around the world: Summing up the state of the art. ZDM Mathematics Education, 39(5–6), 353.
Walling, D. R. (2014). Designing learning for tablet classrooms. Innovations in instruction. London: Springer.
Weiser, M. (1991). The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American, 265(3), 94–104.
Acknowledgements
This chapter is part of a project that deals with teachers and students’ use of digital technologies in extending both mathematics and didactic knowledge. I acknowledge the support received from research projects with references Conacyt-168543 and EDU2017-84276-R.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Santos-Trigo, M. (2019). Mathematical Problem Solving and the Use of Digital Technologies. In: Liljedahl, P., Santos-Trigo, M. (eds) Mathematical Problem Solving. ICME-13 Monographs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10472-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10472-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10471-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10472-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)