Skip to main content

Global Political Economy and Modernity: Four Paradigmatic Views

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Global Political Economy
  • 1013 Accesses

Abstract

Any explanation of modernity is based on a worldview. The premise of this book is that any worldview can be associated with one of the four broad paradigms: functionalist, interpretive, radical humanist, and radical structuralist. This chapter takes the case of modernity and discusses it from the four different viewpoints. It emphasizes that the four views expressed are equally scientific and informative; they look at the phenomenon from their certain paradigmatic viewpoint; and together they provide a more balanced understanding of the phenomenon under consideration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For this literature see Eisenstadt (1970), Harper (1993), Marques and Puig (2015), Parrenas (2015), Smelser (1966), and Spencer (2015). This section is based on Jaffee (1990).

  2. 2.

    For this literature see Latouche (1996), Mattelart (2010), Nettl and Robertson (1968), Short (2012), Toulmin (1990), and Zureik (2010). This section is based on Giddens (1990).

  3. 3.

    For this literature see Falola (2014), Friedman and Friedman (2011), Kellner (1989), Offe (1996), Rappa (2011), Smart (1999), and Walby (2009). This section is based on Hall (1992).

  4. 4.

    For this literature see Dussel (1998), Lacher (2006), McChesney et al. (1998), Robinson (2010), Smith (2016), and Wallerstein (1984). This section is based on Wallerstein (2000).

References

  • Dussel, Enrique. 1998. Beyond Eurocentrism: The World-System and the Limits of Modernity. In The Cultures of Globalization, ed. Fredric Jameson and Masao Miyoshi, 3–31. Durham, NC, USA: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt, S.N. 1970. Social Change and Development. In Readings in Social Evolution and Development, ed. S.N. Eisenstadt, 3–33. Oxford, Britain: Pergamon Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Falola, Toyin. 2014. The African Diaspora: Slavery, Modernity, and Globalization. Rochester, NY, USA: University of Rochester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Kajsa Ekholm, and Jonathan Friedman. 2011. Modernization, Class, and the Contradictions of Globalization: The Anthropology of Global Systems. Lanham, MD, USA: AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony. 1990. Consequences of Modernity. Stanford, CA, USA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Stuart. 1992. Introduction. In Formations of Modernity, ed. Stuart Hall and Bram Gieben, 1–16. Cambridge, England, USA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, Charles L. 1993. Exploring Social Change. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffee, David. 1990. Levels of Socio-Economic Development Theory. Westport, CT, USA: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellner, Douglas. 1989. Critical Theory, Marxism, and Modernity. Baltimore, MD, USA: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacher, Hannes. 2006. Beyond Globalization: Capitalism, Territoriality and the International Relations of Modernity. New York, NY, USA: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Latouche, Serge. 1996. The Westernization of the World: The Significance, Scope and Limits of the Drive towards Global Uniformity. Cambridge, Britain: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marques, Helena, and Francisco Puig. 2015. Territory, Specialization and Globalization in European Manufacturing. New York, NY, USA: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattelart, Armand. 2010. The Globalization of Surveillance. Cambridge, Britain: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McChesney, Robert W., Ellen Meiksins Wood, and John Bellamy Foster (eds.). 1998. Capitalism and the Information Age: The Political Economy of the Global Communication Revolution. New York, NY, USA: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettl, J.P., and Roland Robertson. 1968. International Systems and the Modernization of Societies: The Formation of National Goals and Attitudes. New York, NY, USA: Basic Books Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offe, Claus. 1996. Modernity and the State: East, West. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrenas, Rachel. 2015. Servants of Globalization: Migration and Domestic Work. Stanford, CA, USA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappa, Antonio L. 2011. Globalization: Power, Authority, and Legitimacy in Late Modernity. Pasir Panjang, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, William I. 2010. Latin America and Global Capitalism: A Critical Globalization Perspective. Baltimore, MD, USA: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, John Rennie. 2012. Globalization, Modernity and the City. New York, NY, USA: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, Barry (ed.). 1999. Resisting McDonaldization. London, Britain: Sage Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smelser, Neil J. 1966. The Modernization of Social Relations (Chap. 8). In Modernization: The Dynamics of Growth, ed. Myron Weiner, 110–121. New York, NY, USA: Basic Book Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, John. 2016. Imperialism in the Twenty-First Century: Globalization, Super-Exploitation, and Capitalism’s Final Crisis. New York, NY, USA: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, James H. 2015. Globalization and Urbanization: The Global Urban Ecosystem. New York, NY, USA: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, Stephen. 1990. Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity. New York, NY, USA: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walby, Sylvia. 2009. Globalization and Inequalities: Complexity and Contested Modernities. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1984. The Politics of the World-Economy. Cambridge, Britain: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, Immanuel. 2000. The Essential Wallerstein. New York, NY, USA: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zureik, Elia (ed.). 2010. Surveillance, Privacy, and the Globalization of Personal Information: International Comparisons. Montreal, QC, Canada: McGill-Queens University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kavous Ardalan .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ardalan, K. (2019). Global Political Economy and Modernity: Four Paradigmatic Views. In: Global Political Economy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10377-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics