Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Global Political Economy and Governance: Four Paradigmatic Views

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Global Political Economy

  • 1052 Accesses

Abstract

Any explanation of governance is based on a worldview. The premise of this book is that any worldview can be associated with one of the four broad paradigms: functionalist, interpretive, radical humanist, and radical structuralist. This chapter takes the case of governance and discusses it from the four different viewpoints. It emphasizes that the four views expressed are equally scientific and informative; they look at the phenomenon from their certain paradigmatic viewpoint; and together they provide a more balanced understanding of the phenomenon under consideration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For this literature see Alter and Meunier (2009), Breitmeier et al. (2006), Diamond (1992, 1994, 1996, 1998, 2000, 2003, 2008), Do Amaral (2010), Doyle (1983, 1999), Drezner (2009), Frederick (1993), Fukuyama (1992), Haas (1958, 1964, 1990), Haas and Schmitter (1964), Held and McGrew (2002), Karatnycky (1999), Kindleberger (1969), Koivisto (2010), Long (1995), Mitrany (1943), Ohmae (1990), Reinecke (1997), and Schumpeter (1976). This section is based on Diamond (2003).

  2. 2.

    For this literature see Brown (1995), Carr (1981), Gilpin (1981, 2005), Held and McGrew (2002), Hirst (2001), Hirst and Thompson (1999), Huntington (1993), Keohane (1986, 1990, 1998), Keohane and Nye (1977), Krasner (1983, 1995, 2011), Low (1997), McNeill (1977), Montgomery and Sagan (2009), Morgenthau (1948), Spiro (1999), Waltz (1979, 1999), Weiss (1998), and Wolf (1999). This section is based on Waltz (1999).

  3. 3.

    For this literature see Archibugi (1995), Archibugi and Held (1995), Archibugi et al. (1998), Bobbio (1988), Burnheim (1985, 1986), Connolly (1991), Cox (1993, 1997, 1999), Cox and Sinclair (1996), Deudney (1998), Dryzek (1990, 1995, 2000), Ekins (1992), Falk (1992, 1995a, b, 1999), Gill (1995, 1996, 1997, 1998), Held (1987, 1991,1993, 1995a, b, 2010), Held and McGrew (2002), Held et al. (1999), Hobsbawm (1994), Kant (1795), Korten (1995), Linklater (1996), McCarthy (2011), McGrew (1997, 2002), Mittelman (1996), Murphy (2005), Neumann and Sending (2010), Patomaki (2000, 2010, 2011), Robinson (1996a, b), Rosenau (1997), Rosenberg (1994), Sakamoto (1997), Sandel (1996), Shaw (1994), Sklair (2001), Thompson (1999), and Walker (1988, 1991). This section is based on Mittelman (1996).

  4. 4.

    For this literature see Burnheim (1985, 1986, 1995), Callinicos et al. (1994), Coward (2005), Dryzek (1995), Duffield (2001), Falk (1987), Frank (1969), Gowan (2001), Held (1987), Held and McGrew (2002), Radice (2008), Scholte (2005), Walker (1988), and Wallerstein (1974, 1979, 1984, 1991, 2000, 2004, 2012). This section is based on Gowan (2001).

References

  • Alter, Karen J., and Sophie Meunier. 2009. The Politics of International Regime Complexity. Perspectives on Politics 7 (1): 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archibugi, Daniele. 1995. Immanuel Kant, Cosmopolitan Law and Peace. European Journal of International Relations 1 (4): 429–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archibugi, Daniele, and David Held (eds.). 1995. Cosmopolitan Democracy: An Agenda for a New World Order. Cambridge, Britain: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archibugi, Daniele, David Held, and Martin Koehler (eds.). 1998. Re-Imagining Political Community: Studies in Cosmopolitan Democracy. Stanford, CA, USA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobbio, Norberto. 1988. Gramsci and the Concept of Civil Society. In Civil Society and the State: New European Perspectives, ed. John Keane. London, Britain: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breitmeier, Helmut, Oran R. Young, and Michael Zulrn. 2006. Analyzing International Environmental Regimes: From Case Study to Database. Boston, MA, USA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. 1995. International Political Theory and the Idea of World Community. In International Relations Theory Today, ed. K. Booth and S. Smith. Cambridge, Britain: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnheim, John. 1985. Is Democracy Possible? The Alternative to Electoral Politics. Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnheim, John. 1986. Democracy, Nation-States, and the World System. In New Forms of Democracy, ed. D. Held and C. Pollitt, 218–239. London, Britain: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnheim, John. 1995. Power-Trading and the Environment. Environmental Politics 4 (4): 49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callinicos, Alex, John Rees, Chris Harman, and Mike Haynes. 1994. Marxism and the New Imperialism. London, Britain: Bookmarks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E.H. 1981. The Twenty Years Crisis 1919-1939. London, Britain: Papermac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, W.E. 1991. Democracy and Territoriality. Millennium 20 (3): 463–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coward, Martin. 2005. The Imperial Character of the Contemporary World Order. Theory and Event 8: 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, Robert W. 1993. Structural Issues of Global Governance. In Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations, ed. Stephen Gill, 259–289. Cambridge, Britain: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, Robert W. 1997. Introduction. In The New Realism: Perspectives on Multilateralism and World Order, ed. Robert W. Cox, xv–xxx. New York, NY, USA: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, Robert W. 1999. Civil Society at the Turn of the Millennium: Prospects for an Alternative World Order. Review of International Studies, 25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, Robert W., and Timothy J. Sinclair (eds.). 1996. Approaches to World Order. Cambridge, Britain: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deudney, D. 1998. Global Village Sovereignty. In The Greening of Sovereignty, ed. K.T. Litfin. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Larry J. 1992. Promoting Democracy. Foreign Policy, Summer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Larry J. 1994. The Global Imperative: Building a Democratic World Order. Current History 93: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Larry J. 1996. Is the Third Wave Over? Journal of Democracy 7 (3): 20–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Larry J. 1998. The Globalization of Democracy. In Globalization and the Third World, ed. Ray Kiely and Phil Marfleet. London, Britain: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Larry J. 2000. The Global State of Democracy. Current History, 413–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Larry J. 2003. Universal Democracy? Policy Review, 119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Larry J. 2008. The Spirit of Democracy: The Struggle to Build Free Societies Throughout the World. New York, NY, USA: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Do Amaral, Marcelo Parreira. 2010. Regime Theory and Educational Governance: The Emergence of an International Education Regime. International Perspectives on Education and Society 12: 57–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, Michael. 1983. Kant, Liberal Legacies and Foreign Affairs. Philosophy and Public Affairs, Summer/Fall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, Michael. 1999. A Liberal View: Preserving and Expanding the Liberal Pacific Union. In International Order and the Future of World Politics, ed. T.V. Paul and John Hall. Cambridge, Britain: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drezner, Daniel W. 2009. The Power and Peril of International Regime Complexity. Perspectives on Politics 7 (1): 65–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J.S. 1990. Discursive Democracy: Politics, Polity and Political Science. Cambridge, Britain: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J.S. 1995. Political and Ecological Communication. Environmental Politics 4 (4): 13–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J.S. 2000. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond. Oxford, Britain: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffield, Mark. 2001. Global Governance and the New Wars: The Merging of Development and Security. London, Britain: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekins, P. 1992. A New World Order: Grassroots Movements for Global Change. London, Britain: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, Richard. 1987. The Global Promise of Social Movements: Explorations at the edge of time. Alternatives 12 (2): 173–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, Richard. 1992. Explorations at the Edge of Time: The Prospects for World Order. Philadelphia, NJ, USA: Temple University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, Richard. 1995a. On Humane Governance: Towards a New Global Politics. Cambridge, Britain: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, Richard. 1995b. Liberalism at the Global Level: The Last of the Independent Commissions? Millennium: Journal of International Studies 24 (3): 563–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, Richard. 1999. Predatory Globalization: A Critique. Cambridge, Britain: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, Andre Gunder. 1969. Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America. New York, NY, USA: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, Howard. 1993. Computer Networking and the Emergence of Global Civil Society. In Global Networks: Computers and International Communication, ed. M. Harasim Linda, 283–295. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, Francis. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. New York, NY, USA: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, Stephen. 1995. Globalization, Market Civilization, and Disciplinary Neoliberalism. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 24 (3): 399–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, Stephen. 1996. Globalization, Democratization, and the Politics of Indifference. In Globalization: Critical Reflections, ed. James H. Mittelman, 205–228. Boulder, CO, USA: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, Stephen. 1997. Global Structural Change and Multilateralism. In Globalization, Democratization and Multilateralism, ed. Stephen Gill, 1–17. New York, NY, USA: St. Martin’s Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, Stephen. 1998. European Governance and New Constitutionalism: Economic and Monetary Union and Alternatives to Disciplinary Neo-liberalism in Europe. New Political Economy 3 (1): 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, Robert G. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge, Britain: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, Robert G. 2005. War Is Too Important to Be Left to Ideological Amateurs. International Relations 19 (1): 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowan, Peter. 2001. Neoliberal Cosmopolitanism. New Left Review, series II 11: 79–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, Ernst B. 1958. The Uniting of Europe. Stanford, CA, USA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, Ernst B. 1964. Beyond the Nation-State: Functionalism and International Organization. Stanford, CA, USA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, Ernst B. 1990. Obtaining International Environmental Protection through Epistemic Consensus. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 19 (3).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas, Ernst B., and Philippe Schmitter. 1964. Economics and Differential Patterns of Political Integration: Projections about Unity in Latin America. International Organization 18: 705–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Held, David. 1987. Models of Democracy. Stanford, CA, USA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, David. 1991. Democracy, the Nation and the Global System. Economy and Society 20 (2): 138–172. Also, in Held, David (ed.) Political Theory Today. Stanford, CA, USA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, David. 1993. Democracy: From City-States to a Cosmopolitan Order? In Prospects for Democracy: North, South, East, West, ed. David Held, 13–52. Stanford, CA, USA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, David. 1995a. Stories of Democracy: Old and New. In Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance, ed. David Held, 3–27. Stanford, CA, USA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, David. 1995b. Cosmopolitan Democracy and the New International Order. In Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance, ed. David Held, 268–286. Stanford, CA, USA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, David. 2010. Cosmopolitanism after 9/11. International Politics 47 (1): 52–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Held, David, and Anthony McGrew (eds.). 2002. Governing Globalization: Power, Authority and Global Governance. Cambridge, Britain: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, David, Anthony McGrew, David Goldblatt, and Jonathan Perraton. 1999. Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture. Stanford, CA, USA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, Paul. 2001. Between the Local and the Global: Democracy in the Twenty-First Century. In Balancing Democracy, ed. Roland Axtmann, 255–311. London, Britain: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, Paul, and Graham Thompson. 1999. Globalization in Question: The International Economy and the Possibilities of Governance. Cambridge, Britain: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, Eric. 1994. The Age of Extremes: A History of the World, 1914-1991. New York, NY, USA: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel P. 1993. The Clash of Civilizations. Foreign Affairs 72 (3): 22–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. 1795. To Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch. In Perpetual Peace and Other Essays. Indianapolis, IN, USA: Hackett Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karatnycky, Adrian. 1999. The 1998 Freedom House Survey: The Decline of Illiberal Democracy. Journal of Democracy 10 (1): 112–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, Robert O. (ed.). 1986. Neorealism and Its Critics. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, Robert O. 1990. Multilateralism: An Agenda for Research. International Journal XLV (4): 731–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, Robert O. 1998. International Institutions: Can Interdependence Work? Foreign Policy 110: 82–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, Robert O., and Joseph S. Nye. 1977. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindleberger, Charles P. 1969. American Business Abroad. New Haven, CT, USA: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koivisto, Marjo. 2010. Crisis, What Crisis? Liberal Order Building and World Order Conventions. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 38 (3): 615–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korten, Davis C. 1995. When Corporations Rule the World. West Hartford, CT, USA: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, Stephen D. 1983. Regimes and the Limits of Realism: Regimes as Autonomous Variables. In International Regimes, ed. Stephen D. Krasner. Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, Stephen D. 1995. Compromising Westphalia. International Security 20 (3): 115–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, Stephen D. 2011. State, Power, Anarchism. Perspectives on Politics 9 (1): 79–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linklater, A. 1996. Citizenship and Sovereignty in the Post-Westphalian State. European Journal of International Relations 2 (1): 77–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, P. 1995. The Harvard School of Liberal International Theory: The Case of Closure. Millennium 24 (3): 489–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low, Murray. 1997. Representation Unbound: Globalization and Democracy. In Spaces of Globalization: Reasserting the Power of the Local, ed. Kevin R. Cox, 240–280. New York, NY, USA: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, Daniel R. 2011. The Meaning of Materiality: Reconsidering the Materialism of Gramsian IR. Review of International Studies 37 (3): 1215–1234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrew, Anthony (ed.). 1997. The Transformation of Democracy? Globalization and Territorial Democracy. Cambridge, Britain: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrew, Anthony. 2002. Transnational Democracy. In Democratic Theory Today: Challenges for the 21st Century, ed. April Carter and Geoffrey Stokes, 269–294. Cambridge, Britain: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, William H. 1977. Territorial States Buries Too Soon. Mershon International Studies Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitrany, David. 1943. A Working Peace System: An Argument for the Functional Development of International Organization. London, Britain: Royal Institute of International Affairs/Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelman, James H. 1996. How Does Globalization Really Work? In Globalization: Critical Reflections, ed. James H. Mittelman, 229–241. Boulder, CO, USA: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, Alexander H., and Scott D. Sagan. 2009. The Perils of Predicting Proliferation. Journal of Conflict Resolution 53 (2): 302–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgenthau, Hans J. 1948. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York, NY, USA: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Craig N. 2005. Global Governance: Poorly Done and Poorly Understood. In Global Institutions, Marginalization, and Development, ed. Craig N. Murphy, 133–146. New York, NY, USA: Routledge. Also in National Affairs 76 (4), 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, Iver B., and Ole Jacob Sending. 2010. Governing the Global Polity: Practice, Mentality, Rationality. Ann Harbor, MI, USA: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohmae, Kenichi. 1990. The Borderless World: Power and Strategy in the Interlinked World Economy. New York, NY, USA: Harper Business, A Division of HarperCollins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patomaki, Heikki. 2000. Republican Public Sphere and the Governance of Globalizing Political Economy. In Value Pluralism, Normative Theory and International Relations, ed. M. Lensu and J.S. Fritz, 160–195. London, Britain: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patomaki, Heikki. 2010. Cosmological Sources of Critical Cosmopolitanism. Review of International Studies 36 (1): 181–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patomaki, Heikki. 2011. Towards Global Political Parties. Ethics and Global Politics 4 (2): 81–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radice, Hugo. 2008. The Developmental State Under Global Neoliberalism. Third World Quarterly 29 (6): 1153–1174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinecke, Wolfgang H. 1997. Global Public Policy. Foreign Affairs 76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, William I. 1996a. Promoting Polyarchy: Globalization, US Intervention, and Hegemony. Cambridge, Britain: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, William I. 1996b. Globalization, the World System, and ‘Democracy Promotion’ in US Foreign Policy. Theory and Society 25: 615–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, James N. 1997. Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier: Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World. Cambridge, Britain: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Justin. 1994. The Empire of Civil Society: A Critique of the Realist Theory of International Relations. London, Britain: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakamoto, Yoshikazu. 1997. Civil Society and Democratic World Order. In Innovation and Transformation in International Studies, ed. Stephen Gill and James H. Mittelman. Cambridge, Britain: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, M. 1996. Democracy’s Discontent. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholte, Jan Aart. 2005. Globalization: A Critical Introduction. New York, NY, USA: St. Martin’s Press, Inc.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. 1976. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London, Britain: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, Timothy M. 1994. Global Society and International Relations. Cambridge, Britain: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sklair, Leslie. 2001. The Transnational Capitalist Class. Oxford, Britain: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, David E. 1999. The Hidden Hand of American Hegemony: Petrodollar Recycling and International Markets. Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Dennis F. 1999. Democratic Theory and Global Society. Journal of Political Philosophy 7 (2): 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R.B.J. 1988. One World, Many Worlds: Struggles for a Just World Peace. Boulder, CO, USA: Lynne Reinner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R.B.J. 1991. On the Spatio-Temporal Conditions of Democratic Practice. Alternatives 16 (2): 243–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, Immanuel Maurice. 1974. The Modern World-System, 2 vols. London, Britain: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, Immanuel Maurice. 1979. The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis. In The Capitalist World-Economy, ed. Immanuel Wallerstein. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, Immanuel Maurice. 1984. The Politics of the World-Economy. Cambridge, Britain: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, Immanuel Maurice. 1991. Geopolitics and Geoculture: Essays on the Changing World-System. Cambridge, Britain: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, Immanuel Maurice. 2000. Globalization or the Age of Transformation? A Long-View of the Trajectory of the World-System. International Sociology 15 (2): 249–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, Immanuel Maurice. 2004. Alternatives: The United States Confronts the World. Boulder, CO, USA: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, Immanuel Maurice. 2012. Robinson’s Critical Appraisal Appraised. International Sociology 27 (4): 524–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, Britain: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, Kenneth N. 1999. Globalization and Governance. Political Science & Politics 32 (4): 693–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Linda. 1998. The Myth of the Powerless State: Governing the Economy in a Global Era. Cambridge, Britain: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, K.D. 1999. The New Raison D’Etat as a Problem for Democracy in World Society. European Journal of International Relations 5 (3): 333–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, Marist College, Poughkeepsie, NY, USA

    Kavous Ardalan

Authors
  1. Kavous Ardalan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kavous Ardalan .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ardalan, K. (2019). Global Political Economy and Governance: Four Paradigmatic Views. In: Global Political Economy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10377-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation