Skip to main content

People Matter

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Systemic Leadership for Local Governance
  • 251 Accesses

Abstract

What? This chapter sets out the fourth stage of the five-stage Adaptive Learning Pathway for Systemic Leadership, which focuses on the importance of involving people and endeavouring to restore a listening ear for the ‘joined up’ nature of individuals, rather than enacting a fragmented landscape of specialised services. There are four suggested resources signposted for thinking about people, whether within organisations, across organisations or within communities. These include changing conversations, Soft Systems Methodology, Interactive Planning and Community Operational Research. The operational principle for focusing on people is participation: the chapter concludes with the associated key facet of systemic leadership for this principle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Ackermann, F. (2012). Problem Structuring Methods ‘in the Dock’: Arguing the Case for Soft OR. European Journal of Operational Research, 219(3), 652–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1981). Creating the Corporate Future. New York, Chichester, Brisbane, and Toronto: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1999). Re-creating the Corporation: A Design of Organizations for the 21st Century. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, R. L. (2001). A Brief Guide to Interactive Planning and Idealized Design. Bryn Mawr, PA. Retrieved November 2015 via Ackoff Center Weblog. https://www.ida.liu.se/~steho87/und/htdd01/AckoffGuidetoIdealizedRedesign.pdf.

  • Ackoff, R. L. (2004). A Black Ghetto’s Research on a University. In G. Midgley & A. E. Ochoa-Arias (Eds.), Community Operational Research: OR and Systems Thinking for Community Development. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, R. L. (2006). Why Few Organizations Adopt Systems Thinking. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 23(5), 705–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adebowale, V., & Kippin, H. (2017). From Public Services to “Services to the Public”: The Three Elements of Contemporary Welfare. Retrieved from http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/services-to-the-public/.

  • Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartunek, J. M., & Moch, M. K. (1987). First-Order, Second-Order, and Third-Order Change and Organization Development Interventions: A Cognitive Approach. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 23(4), 483–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, W. (1969). Organization Development: Its Nature, Origins and Prospects. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D. (1987). Unfolding Meaning. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D. (1999). On Dialogue. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, H. (Ed.). (2015). The Sage Handbook of Action Research (3rd ed.). London, Thousand Oaks, CA, New Delhi, and Singapore: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (2012). Four Conditions for Serious Systems Thinking and Action. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 29(5), 465–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P., & Poulter, J. (2006). Learning for Action: A Short Definitive Account of Soft Systems Methodology and Its Use for Practitioner, Teachers, and Students. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P., & Scholes, P. (1990). Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, F. E., & Trist, E. L. (2012). Towards a Social Ecology: Contextual Appreciations of the Future in the Present. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of Expansive Learning: Foundations, Findings and Future Challenges. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L., & Jackson, M. C. (1991). Creative Problem Solving: Total Systems Intervention. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, A. J., & Atkins, J. P. (2018). Community Operational Research and Citizen Science: Two Icons in Need of Each Other? European Journal of Operational Research, 268(3), 1111–1124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herron, R. (2013). Community OR. In S. I. Gass & M. C. Fu (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science (pp. 200–206). Boston, MA: Springer US.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Herron, R., & Mendiwelso-Bendek, Z. (2018). Supporting Self-Organised Community Research Through Informal Learning. European Journal of Operational Research, 268(3), 825–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesse-Biber, S. N., & Leavy, P. (2010). Handbook of Emergent Methods. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, C. (2016). Tapping the Resource Within? Exploring a Learning Pathway for Systemic Leadership Within Local Governance Networks. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Ph.D. Systems Science, University of Hull, Hull, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howick, S., & Ackermann, F. (2011). Mixing OR Methods in Practice: Past, Present and Future Directions. European Journal of Operational Research, 215(3), 503–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (2003). Systems Thinking: Creative Holism for Managers. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, M., & Rosenhead, J. (2010). IFORS’ Operational Research Hall of Fame: Russell L. Ackoff. International Transactions in Operational Research, 17(1), 145–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1946). Action Research and Minority Problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Local Government Association. (2017). New Conversations: LGA Guide to Engagement. London: LGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G. (2000). Systemic Intervention: Philosophy, Methodology, and Practice. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G., Johnson, M. P., & Chichirau, G. (2017). What Is Community Operational Research? European Journal of Operational Research. Advance online publication, from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221717307452.

  • Midgley, G., & Ochoa-Arias, A. E. (2004). Community Operational Research: OR and Systems Thinking for Community Development. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J., & Rosenhead, J. (2004). Problem Structuring Methods in Action. European Journal of Operational Research, 152(3), 530–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, C. (2004). Housing in the Dearne Valley: Doing Community OR with the Thurnscoe Tenants Housing Co-operative. In G. Midgley & A. E. Ochoa-Arias (Eds.), Community Operational Research: OR and Systems Thinking for Community Development (pp. 121–142). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenhead, J. (1996). What’s the Problem? An Introduction to Problem Structuring Methods. Interfaces, 26(6), 117–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, P. (2002). Changing Conversations in Organizations: A Complexity Approach to Change (Vol. 6). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, P., & Stacey, R. (Eds.). (2005). Experiencing Spontaneity, Risk & Improvisation in Organizational Life: Working Live. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, J. (1993). Conversational Realities: Constructing Life Through Language. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, W. M., & Wenger, E. (2010). Our World as a Learning System: A Communities of Practice Approach. In C. Blackmore (Ed.), Social Learning Systems and Communities of Practice. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, R. D. (2012). Tools and Techniques of Leadership and Management: Meeting the Challenge of Complexity. Abingdon, Oxon, and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, R. D., & Mowles, C. (2015). Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics: The Challenge of Complexity to Ways of Thinking About Organisations (7th ed.). Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations: Foundations for Organizational Science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems. Organization, 7(2), 225–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Hobbs .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hobbs, C. (2019). People Matter. In: Systemic Leadership for Local Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-08280-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics