People Matter

  • Catherine HobbsEmail author


What? This chapter sets out the fourth stage of the five-stage Adaptive Learning Pathway for Systemic Leadership, which focuses on the importance of involving people and endeavouring to restore a listening ear for the ‘joined up’ nature of individuals, rather than enacting a fragmented landscape of specialised services. There are four suggested resources signposted for thinking about people, whether within organisations, across organisations or within communities. These include changing conversations, Soft Systems Methodology, Interactive Planning and Community Operational Research. The operational principle for focusing on people is participation: the chapter concludes with the associated key facet of systemic leadership for this principle.




  1. Ackermann, F. (2012). Problem Structuring Methods ‘in the Dock’: Arguing the Case for Soft OR. European Journal of Operational Research, 219(3), 652–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackoff, R. L. (1981). Creating the Corporate Future. New York, Chichester, Brisbane, and Toronto: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Ackoff, R. L. (1999). Re-creating the Corporation: A Design of Organizations for the 21st Century. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Ackoff, R. L. (2001). A Brief Guide to Interactive Planning and Idealized Design. Bryn Mawr, PA. Retrieved November 2015 via Ackoff Center Weblog.
  5. Ackoff, R. L. (2004). A Black Ghetto’s Research on a University. In G. Midgley & A. E. Ochoa-Arias (Eds.), Community Operational Research: OR and Systems Thinking for Community Development. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Ackoff, R. L. (2006). Why Few Organizations Adopt Systems Thinking. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 23(5), 705–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Adebowale, V., & Kippin, H. (2017). From Public Services to “Services to the Public”: The Three Elements of Contemporary Welfare. Retrieved from
  8. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bartunek, J. M., & Moch, M. K. (1987). First-Order, Second-Order, and Third-Order Change and Organization Development Interventions: A Cognitive Approach. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 23(4), 483–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bennis, W. (1969). Organization Development: Its Nature, Origins and Prospects. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  11. Bohm, D. (1987). Unfolding Meaning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Bohm, D. (1999). On Dialogue. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Bradbury, H. (Ed.). (2015). The Sage Handbook of Action Research (3rd ed.). London, Thousand Oaks, CA, New Delhi, and Singapore: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Checkland, P. (2012). Four Conditions for Serious Systems Thinking and Action. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 29(5), 465–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Checkland, P., & Poulter, J. (2006). Learning for Action: A Short Definitive Account of Soft Systems Methodology and Its Use for Practitioner, Teachers, and Students. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Checkland, P., & Scholes, P. (1990). Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Emery, F. E., & Trist, E. L. (2012). Towards a Social Ecology: Contextual Appreciations of the Future in the Present. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
  18. Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of Expansive Learning: Foundations, Findings and Future Challenges. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Flood, R. L., & Jackson, M. C. (1991). Creative Problem Solving: Total Systems Intervention. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  20. Gregory, A. J., & Atkins, J. P. (2018). Community Operational Research and Citizen Science: Two Icons in Need of Each Other? European Journal of Operational Research, 268(3), 1111–1124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Herron, R. (2013). Community OR. In S. I. Gass & M. C. Fu (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science (pp. 200–206). Boston, MA: Springer US.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Herron, R., & Mendiwelso-Bendek, Z. (2018). Supporting Self-Organised Community Research Through Informal Learning. European Journal of Operational Research, 268(3), 825–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hesse-Biber, S. N., & Leavy, P. (2010). Handbook of Emergent Methods. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hobbs, C. (2016). Tapping the Resource Within? Exploring a Learning Pathway for Systemic Leadership Within Local Governance Networks. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Ph.D. Systems Science, University of Hull, Hull, UK.Google Scholar
  25. Howick, S., & Ackermann, F. (2011). Mixing OR Methods in Practice: Past, Present and Future Directions. European Journal of Operational Research, 215(3), 503–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jackson, M. C. (2003). Systems Thinking: Creative Holism for Managers. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Kirby, M., & Rosenhead, J. (2010). IFORS’ Operational Research Hall of Fame: Russell L. Ackoff. International Transactions in Operational Research, 17(1), 145–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lewin, K. (1946). Action Research and Minority Problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Local Government Association. (2017). New Conversations: LGA Guide to Engagement. London: LGA.Google Scholar
  30. Midgley, G. (2000). Systemic Intervention: Philosophy, Methodology, and Practice. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Midgley, G., Johnson, M. P., & Chichirau, G. (2017). What Is Community Operational Research? European Journal of Operational Research. Advance online publication, from
  32. Midgley, G., & Ochoa-Arias, A. E. (2004). Community Operational Research: OR and Systems Thinking for Community Development. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mingers, J., & Rosenhead, J. (2004). Problem Structuring Methods in Action. European Journal of Operational Research, 152(3), 530–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ritchie, C. (2004). Housing in the Dearne Valley: Doing Community OR with the Thurnscoe Tenants Housing Co-operative. In G. Midgley & A. E. Ochoa-Arias (Eds.), Community Operational Research: OR and Systems Thinking for Community Development (pp. 121–142). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rosenhead, J. (1996). What’s the Problem? An Introduction to Problem Structuring Methods. Interfaces, 26(6), 117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shaw, P. (2002). Changing Conversations in Organizations: A Complexity Approach to Change (Vol. 6). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Shaw, P., & Stacey, R. (Eds.). (2005). Experiencing Spontaneity, Risk & Improvisation in Organizational Life: Working Live. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Shotter, J. (1993). Conversational Realities: Constructing Life Through Language. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Snyder, W. M., & Wenger, E. (2010). Our World as a Learning System: A Communities of Practice Approach. In C. Blackmore (Ed.), Social Learning Systems and Communities of Practice. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stacey, R. D. (2012). Tools and Techniques of Leadership and Management: Meeting the Challenge of Complexity. Abingdon, Oxon, and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stacey, R. D., & Mowles, C. (2015). Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics: The Challenge of Complexity to Ways of Thinking About Organisations (7th ed.). Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
  42. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations: Foundations for Organizational Science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  43. Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems. Organization, 7(2), 225–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Systems StudiesHull University Business SchoolCumbriaUK

Personalised recommendations