Skip to main content

“Strukturieren, Strukturieren, Strukturieren” in the Era of Robotic Process Automation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Art of Structuring

Abstract

While, in the first machine age, physical power was automated, intellectual power is automated in the second machine age. This development has interesting implications for Jörg’s leitmotif “Strukturieren, Strukturieren, Strukturieren”. In this article, we add to this discussion in the context of structuring processes. Therefore, we first structure the discussion about robotic process automation. After that, we illustrate how robots can support the structuring of processes. Our article concludes with some general remarks on process automation.

“The computer and the new decision-making techniques associated with it are bringing changes to white-collar, executive, and professional work as momentous as those the introduction of machinery has brought to manual jobs”.

Simon (1960, p. xi)

“Es ist Aufgabe des Wirtschaftsinformatikers, in schnelllebiger Zeit sein Erkenntnisobjekt so zu strukturieren, dass die konzeptionellen Überlegungen längerzyklischer sind als technologische Entwicklungen, dennoch aber die Möglichkeit eröffnen, jene zu integrieren.”

Becker (2001, p. 14, original without page numbers)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Becker, J. (2001). Einige Thesen zur Forschung in der Wirtschaftsinformatik. Unpublished Manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom, N. (2016). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Valentin, C., Emrich, A., Werth, D., & Loos, P. (2013). Architecture and implementation of a decision support system for software industry business models. In Proceedings of the 19th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2013). Chicago, lL (USA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Evermann, J., Rehse, J.-R., & Fettke, P. (2017). Predicting process behaviour using deep learning. Decision Support Systems, 100(8), 129–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fettke, P., & Loos, P. (2003). Model driven architecture (MDA). Wirtschaftsinformatik, 45(5), 555–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fettke, P., & Loos, P. (2004). Referenzmodellierungsforschung. Wirtschaftsinformatik, 46(5), 331–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fettke, P., & Loos, P. (2007). Perspectives on Reference Modeling. In P. Fettke & P. Loos (Eds.), Reference modeling for business systems analysis (pp. 1–20). Hershey, PA/London: Idea Group.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1991). Old wine in new bottles. The Economic, 101(404), 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, B., Klier, M., & Zimmermann, S. (2015). Automated planning of process models: Design of a novel approach to construct exclusive choices. Decision Support Systems, 78(10), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houy, C., Fettke, P., & Loos, P. (2010). Empirical research in business process management—Analysis of an emerging field of research. Business Process Management Journal, 16(4), 619–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchmer, M. (2017). Robotic process automation-pragmatic solution or dangerous illusion. Retrieved September 27, 2018, from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mathias_Kirchmer/publication/317730848_Robotic_Process_Automation_-_Pragmatic_Solution_or_Dangerous_Illusion/links/594f913da6fdccebfa69e543/Robotic-Process-Automation-Pragmatic-Solution-or-Dangerous-Illusion.pdf.

  • Koschmider, A., Hornung, T., & Oberweis, A. (2011). Recommendation-based editor for business process modeling. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 70(6), 483–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krivograd, N., Fettke, P., & Loos, P. (2014). Development of an intelligent maturity model-tool for business process management. In Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS). Waikoloa (HI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumeich, J., Zapp, M., Mayer, D., Werth, D., & Loos, P. (2016). Modeling complex event patterns in EPC-models and transforming them into an executable event pattern language. In V. Nissen, D. Stelzer, S. Straßburger, & D. Fischer (Eds.), Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (MKWI) (pp. 81–92). Ilmenau: Universitätsverlag Ilmenau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morana, S., Schacht, S., & Maedche, A. (2016). Exploring the design, use, and outcomes of process guidance systems - a qualitative field study. In J. Pasons, T. Tuunanen, J. Venable, B. Donnellan, M. Helfert, & J. Kenneally (Eds.), Tackling Society’s Grand Challenges with Design Science: 11th International Conference, DESRIST 2016 (pp. 81–96). St. John’s, NL (CA): Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, A. (2016). What artificial intelligence can and can’t do right now. Harvard Business Review, Digital Articles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehse, J.-R., Fettke, P., & Loos, P. (2015). A graph-theoretic method for the inductive development of reference process models. Software & Systems Modeling, 16(3), 833–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riefer, M., Ternis, S. F., & Thaler, T. (2016). Mining process models from natural language text: A state-of-the-art analysis. In V. Nissen, D. Stelzer, S. Straßburger, & D. Fischer (Eds.), Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (MKWI) (pp. 1–12). Ilmenau: Universitätsverlag Ilmenau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheer, A.-W. (2000). ARIS—business process modeling (3rd ed.). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scheer, A. -W. (2017). Robotic Process Automation (RPA): Revolution der Unternehmenssoftware. IM + io, 127(3), 30–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1960). The new science of management decision. New York: Harper & Brothers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2012). Process mining: Overview and opportunities. Communications of the ACM, 55(8), 76–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Aalst, W. M. P., Bichler, M., & Heinzl, A. (2018). Robotic process automation. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 60(4), 269–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zapp, M., Fettke, P., & Loos, P. (2017). Towards a software prototype supporting automatic recognition of sketched business process models. In J. M. Leimeister & W. Brenner (Eds.), Proceedings der 13. Internationalen Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI 2017) (pp. 1283–1286). St. Gallen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelewski, S. (1986). Das Leistungspotential der Künstlichen Intelligenz: Eine informationstechnisch-betriebswirtschaftliche Analyse. Witterschlick, Bonn: M. Wehle.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Fettke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fettke, P., Loos, P. (2019). “Strukturieren, Strukturieren, Strukturieren” in the Era of Robotic Process Automation. In: Bergener, K., Räckers, M., Stein, A. (eds) The Art of Structuring. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06234-7_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics