Skip to main content

The Need for a Maturity Model for Maturity Modeling

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Art of Structuring

Abstract

Over the last decades, maturity models have gained popularity in both research and practice. While the growing number of maturity models demonstrates their potential, there seems to be a lack of structure in the development of these models and an unclear sense of quality of the resulting maturity models. The purpose of this paper is to analyse the continuing popularity of maturity modelling in more depth. The paper concludes that there clearly is a need for such a maturity model for maturity modelling (MM4MM). It provides some initial ideas for the design of such a model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Al-Ruithe, M., & Benkhelifa, E. (2017). Cloud data governance maturity model. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Internet of Things, Data and Cloud Computing (pp. 151:1–151:10). New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J., Knackstedt, R., & Pöppelbuß, J. (2009). Developing maturity models for IT management. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 1(3), 213–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J., Niehaves, B., Pöppelbuß, J., & Simons, A. (2010). Maturity models in IS research. In ECIS 2010 Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J. (2006). Level 5 leadership: The triumph of humility and fierce resolve. Managing Innovation and Change, 234.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bruin, T., Freeze, R., Kaulkarni, U., & Rosemann, M. (2005). Understanding the main phases of developing a maturity assessment model. In Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, P., Moultrie, J., & Gregory, M. (2002). The use of maturity models/grids as a tool in assessing product development capability. In Proceedings of IEEE International Engineering Management Conference (IEMC) (Vol. 1, pp. 244–249).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hribar Rajterič, I. (2010). Overview of business intelligence maturity models. Management: Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 15(1), 47–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlegger, M., Maier, R., & Thalmann, S. (2009). Understanding maturity models results of a structured content analysis. In Proceedings of IKNOW’09 and ISEMANTICS’09. Graz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mettler, T., Rohner, P., & Winter, R. (2010). Towards a classification of maturity models in information systems. In Management of the interconnected world (pp. 333–340). Physica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulk, M. C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M. B., & Weber, C. V. (1993). Capability maturity model, version 1.1. IEEE Software, 10(4), 18–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poeppelbuss, J., Niehaves, B., Simons, A., & Becker, J. (2011). Maturity models in information systems research: Literature search and analysis. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 29(1), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pöppelbuß, J., & Röglinger, M. (2011). What makes a useful maturity model? A framework of general design principles for maturity models and its demonstration in business process management. In Ecis 2011 Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proença, D., & Borbinha, J. (2016). Maturity models for information systems—a state of the art. Procedia Computer Science, 100, 1042–1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Röglinger, M., Pöppelbuß, J., & Becker, J. (2012). Maturity models in business process management. Business Process Management Journal, 18(2), 328–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smits, D., & van Hillergersberg, J. (2015). IT governance maturity : Developing a maturity model using the delphi method. In 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 4534–4543).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarhan, A., Turetken, O., & Reijers, H. A. (2016). Business process maturity models: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 75, 122–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Steenbergen, M., Bos, R., Brinkkemper, S., Van De Weerd, I., & Bekkers, W. (2010). The design of focus area maturity models. Global perspectives on design science research (pp. 317–332). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., Chen, K., & Xu, D. (2016). A maturity model for blockchain adoption. Financial Innovation, 2(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendler, R. (2012). The maturity of maturity model research: A systematic mapping study. Information and Software Technology, 54(12), 1317–1339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jos van Hillegersberg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

van Hillegersberg, J. (2019). The Need for a Maturity Model for Maturity Modeling. In: Bergener, K., Räckers, M., Stein, A. (eds) The Art of Structuring. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06234-7_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics