Skip to main content

Training Curriculum for Colorectal Cancer Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Emergency Surgical Management of Colorectal Cancer

Part of the book series: Hot Topics in Acute Care Surgery and Trauma ((HTACST))

  • 752 Accesses

Abstract

Gain of experience by learning only in the operating room is no longer relevant. Like surgery itself, training had to evolve and adapt to new challenges. Acquisition of knowledge and the preparation of the trainee is an active phase. Virtual reality, box trainers, animal and cadaveric models are means to reach an adequate skill level and be able to manage situations in patient with sufficient safety. Surgical technique must finally be fully acquired with during the interventions with an expert surgeon who will be able to make the necessary corrections and feedbacks. A clear training curriculum must be implemented in each colorectal surgery program. It should be used to validate the transition to a higher step and standardize the surgical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991;1:144–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. NICE technology appraisal guidance TA105. 2006. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta10.

  3. www.lapco.nhs.uk/about-the-programme.php.

  4. Health and Social Care Information Centre. National Bowel Cancer Audit Progress Report. Tripartite Colorectal Meeting, Birmingham. 2014. http://www.hscic.gov.uk/bowel.

  5. Satava RM. Virtual reality surgical simulator. The first steps. Surg Endosc. 1993;7:203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nagendran M, Gurusamy KS, Aggarwal R, Loizidou M, Davidson BR. Virtual reality training for surgical trainees in laparoscopic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(8):CD006575.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grantcharov TP, Funch-Jensen P. Can everyone achieve proficiency with the laparoscopic technique? Learning curve patterns in technical skills acquisition. Am J Surg. 2009;197(4):447–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gurusamy KS, Nagendran M, Toon CD, Davidson BR. Laparoscopic surgical box model training for surgical trainees with limited prior laparoscopic experience. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(3):CD010478. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010478.pub2.

  9. Böhm B, Milsom JW. Animal models as educational tools in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc. 1994;8(6):707–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Willaert W, Van De Putte D, Van Renterghem K, Van Nieuwenhove Y, Ceelen W, Pattyn P. Training models in laparoscopy: a systematic review comparing their effectiveness in learning surgical skills. Acta Chir Belg. 2013;113:77–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Leblanc F, Champagne BJ, Augestad KM, et al. A comparison of human cadaver and augmented reality simulator models for straight laparoscopic colorectal skills acquisition training. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211:250–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Leblanc F, Senagore AJ, Ellis CN, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy skills acquisition: augmented reality simulator versus human cadaver training models. J Surg Educ. 2010;67:200–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Miskovic D, Wyles SM, Ni M, Darzi AW, Hanna GB. Systematic review on mentoring and simulation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Ann Surg. 2010;252:943–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ansell J, Goddard S, Gupta V, Warren N, Williams G, Haray P, Appleton B, Phillips S, Torkington J. A new ex vivo animal simulation model for skills training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Bull R Coll Surgeons Engl. 2014;96(4):122–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mackenzie H, Miskovic D, Ni M, et al. Risk prediction score in laparoscopic colorectal surgery training. Ann Surg. 2015;261:338–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ogiso S, Yamaguchi T, Fukuda M, et al. Laparoscopic resection for sigmoid and rectosigmoid colon cancer performed by trainees: impact on short-term outcomes and selection of suitable patients. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012;27:1215–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Miskovic D, Ni M, Wyles SM, Tekkis P, Hanna GB. Learning curve and case selection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: systematic review and international multicenter analysis of 4852 cases. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55(12):1300–10. (learning Curve).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hemandas A, Flashman K, Farrow J, et al. Modular training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery maximizes training opportunities without clinical compromise. World J Surg. 2011;35:409–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mackenzie H, Miskovic D, Ni M, et al. Clinical and educational proficiency gain of supervised laparoscopic colorectal surgical trainees. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:2704–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2806-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. de Montbrun S, Roberts PL, Satterthwaite L, MacRae H. Implementing and evaluating a national certification technical skills examination. Ann Surg. 2016;264:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001620.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. de Montbrun SL, Roberts PL, Lowry AC, et al. A novel approach to assessing technical competence of colorectal surgery residents: the development and evaluation of the Colorectal Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (COSATS). Ann Surg. 2013;258:1001–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31829b32b8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Miskovic D, Ni M, Wyles SM, Parvaiz A, Hanna GB. Observational clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA) for competency assessment in laparoscopic colorectal surgery at the specialist level. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:796–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1955-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hemandas A, Flashman KG, Farrow J, O’Leary DP, Parvaiz A. Modular training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery maximizes training opportunities without clinical compromise. World J Surg. 2011;35:409–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0837-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kelly M, Bhangu A, Singh P. Systematic review and meta-analysis of trainee- versus expert surgeon-performed colorectal resection. Br J Surg. 2014;101:750–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Buchs NC. Training in robotic general surgery: the next challenge. Adv Robot Autom. 2012;1:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Disbrow DE, Pannell SM, Shanker BA, et al. The effect of formal robotic residency training on the adoption of minimally invasive surgery by young colorectal surgeons. J Surg Educ. 2018;75(3):767–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Buchs NC, Pugin F, Volonté F, et al. Learning tools and simulation in robotic surgery: state of the art. World J Surg. 2013;37(12):2812–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pernar LIM, Robertson FC, Tavakkoli A, et al. An appraisal of the learning curve in robotic general surgery. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(11):4583–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sian TS, Tierney GM, Park H, et al. Robotic colorectal surgery: previous laparoscopic colorectal experience is not essential. J Robot Surg. 2018;12(2):271–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Raimondi P, Marchegiani F, Cieri M, et al. Is right colectomy a complete learning procedure for a robotic surgical program? J Robot Surg. 2018;12(1):147–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RDH, et al. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery, the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg. 1982;69(10):613–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Francis N, Penna M, Mackenzie H, et al. Consensus on structured training curriculum for transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME). Surg Endosc. 2017;31(7):2711–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Penna M, Whiteford M, Hompes R, et al. Developing and assessing a cadaveric training model for transanal total mesorectal excision: initial experience in the UK and USA. Colorectal Dis. 2017;19(5):476–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Adamina M, Buchs NC, Penna M, et al. St.Gallen consensus on safe implementation of transanal total mesorectal excision. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(3):1091–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frederic Ris .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chevallay, M., Vitali, G.C., Buchs, N.C., Ris, F. (2019). Training Curriculum for Colorectal Cancer Surgery. In: de'Angelis, N., Di Saverio, S., Brunetti, F. (eds) Emergency Surgical Management of Colorectal Cancer. Hot Topics in Acute Care Surgery and Trauma. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06225-5_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06225-5_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-06224-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-06225-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics