Skip to main content

The Follow-Up on the 0.7% Target: A Bird’s-Eye Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover International Development Assistance

Part of the book series: EADI Global Development Series ((EADI))

  • 320 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter provides a description and analysis of the follow-up on the 0.7% target by individual DAC members, decade by decade and into the new century. The major Western countries remained the main providers of ODA in absolute terms (measured in US dollars), but their share of the DAC total declined. This applies especially to the US, which provided more than half of the DAC total in the early years. Overall, the ODA of DAC countries as a share of GNP/GNI declined over the years. Vis-à-vis the 0.7% target, the so-called frontrunners—Denmark, the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden—made a difference, although their ODA was modest in absolute terms. Their share of the DAC total increased from 2.5% in 1960 to 11.7% in 2016.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Stokke (2009): Table A.1. This table, and the following tables from the same source (Tables A.3, A.7, A.10, and A. 13) referred to in this chapter, are based on DAC statistics in current prices and exchange rates (actual transfers). During the first four years of the 1960s, the US contributed 0.56%, 0.59%, 0.56% and 0.49% of its GNP in ODA, respectively, but this percentage declined to between 0.33% and 0.31% during the last three years of the decade. France contributed 14.5% of the total ODA of the DAC in current prices during this decade, but this assistance also included the assistance to its dependencies (Départements d’Outre-Mer [DOMs] and Territoires d’Outre Mer [TOMs]). In the first three years of the 1960s, France’s assistance amounted to 1.38%, 1.35% and 1.26% of its GNP, respectively, declining to 0.71%, 0.67% and 0.68%, respectively, during the last three years of the decade. In the 1960s, the UK provided 9.7% of the total ODA of the DAC. As a share of GNP, its ODA varied between 0.59% and 0.46% during the first seven years of the period and between 0.44% and 0.39% during the last three years of the 1960s.

  2. 2.

    Stokke (2009): Table A.1.

  3. 3.

    Ibid.

  4. 4.

    Ibid.

  5. 5.

    Ibid.

  6. 6.

    Ibid. Please keep in mind that throughout this chapter—based on OECD statistics—ODA (and percentages of GNP/GNI) are based on actual transfers. Targets set by the frontrunners may, in contrast, be budgetary targets—that is, targets set in the currency of the countries concerned, calculated one year in advance and based on the assumed growth of the GNP—not the actual transfers.

  7. 7.

    Ibid: Tables A.3 and A.6. For a few Arab countries, the golden era as aid providers continued into the 1980s. This applied especially to Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, but then with a declining trend towards the end of the decade. As a share of GNP, Saudi Arabia’ development assistance was well over 1% during the first part of the 1980s (OECD 1987: 78).

  8. 8.

    Stokke (2009): Table A.7.

  9. 9.

    The US’ share of the total ODA of DAC countries for the 1980s was 24.7%—down from 57.7% in the 1960s and 27.5% in the 1970s. France’s share was 14.7%, about the same percentage as in previous decades (14.5% in the 1960s and 14.7% in the1970s). The share of the UK was 5.7%, down from 9.7% in the 1960s and 7.2% in the 1970s (Stokke 2009: Tables A.1, A.3, and A.7).

  10. 10.

    Stokke (2009): Table A.7.

  11. 11.

    Ibid.

  12. 12.

    Ibid.

  13. 13.

    In the 1990s, OECD statistics started to report based on GNI—but not systematically.

  14. 14.

    Stokke (2009): Tables A.7; A.10. For 1999, GNI is substituted for GNP.

  15. 15.

    Stokke (2009): Table A.10. In 1996 and 1997, the percentages were 0.12% and 0.09%, respectively. Its ODA increased from USD84 billion in the 1980s to USD96 billion in the 1990s.

  16. 16.

    Ibid.

  17. 17.

    Ibid.

  18. 18.

    Ibid.

  19. 19.

    Stokke 2009: Table A.13 for the years 2000–2006; OECD 2009: Table A.13 for 2007; 2011: Table A.1 and Annex A for the years 2008–2010; 2015: Table A.4 for 2011–2013; and 2017: 7, 30–149 for 2016 (preliminary data).

  20. 20.

    Ibid.—and calculations based on data in these sources.

  21. 21.

    Ibid.

  22. 22.

    Ibid.

  23. 23.

    Ibid.

  24. 24.

    OECD 2015: Table A.4; 2017: 7—and calculations based on these sources.

  25. 25.

    Stokke 2009: Table A.13 for the years 2000–2006; OECD 2009: Table A.13 for 2007; 2011: Table A.1 and Annex A for the years 2008–2010; 2015: Table A.4 for 2011–2013; 2017: 30–149 for 2016 (preliminary data).

  26. 26.

    Ibid.

  27. 27.

    Stokke 2009: Tables A.1, A.3, A.7, A.10, A.13; and OECD 2011: Table A.1; 2015: Table A.4; and 2017: 30–149 (preliminary data). And calculations based on these sources.

References

  • OECD. (1987). Development Co-operation. Efforts and Policies of the Members of the Development Assistance Committee. 1986 Report. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2009). OECD Journal on Development. Development Co-operation Report 2009 (Vol. 10, No. 1). Paris: OECD DAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2011). Development Co-operation Report 2011 (50th Anniversary ed.). Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2012). Development Co-operation Report 2012, Linking Sustainability and Development. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2015). Development Co-operation Report 2015: Making Partnership Effective Coalitions for Action. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2017). Development Co-operation Report. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.17871/dcr-207-en

  • Stokke, O. (2009). The UN and Development: From Aid to Cooperation. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olav Stokke .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stokke, O. (2019). The Follow-Up on the 0.7% Target: A Bird’s-Eye Perspective. In: International Development Assistance. EADI Global Development Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06219-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics