Skip to main content

Comparison Between Lactuca sativa L. and Lolium perenne: Phytoextraction Capacity of Ni, Fe, and Co from Galvanoplastic Industry

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Energy Technology 2019

Abstract

Heavy metals stay in the environment for large periods of time, which contribute to them being highly toxic and are associated to illness in human beings and biodiversity reduction. The present paper used Lactuca sativa L. and Lolium perenne to remove heavy metals from galvanoplastic waste polluted soil. Nickel, Cobalt, and Iron (adsorbents) from galvanoplastic waste were chosen as parameters in the biosorbents (roots, stem, and leaves). Particle size phytoextracted by L. sativa L. and L. perenne were analyzed using SEM (Scanning Electron Microscopy) and Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AA). It was determined that L. sativa L. has a greater absorption capacity, but a lower intrinsic velocity than L. perenne . The greatest survival time was presented by L. perenne .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sarkar B (2002) Heavy metals in the environment. Marcel Dekker, Inc., United States of America

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kumar PBAN, Dushenkov V, Motto H, Raskin I (1995) Phytoextraction: the use of plants to remove heavy metals from soils. Environ Sci Technol

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ong ST, Yip SP, Keng PS, Lee SL, Hung YT (2012) Papaya (Carica papaya) seed as a low-cost sorbent for zinc removal. Afr J Agric Res

    Google Scholar 

  4. Thangavel P, Subhuram CV (2004) Phytoextraction—role of hyper accumulators in metal contaminated soils. In: Proceedings of the Indian national science academy

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ensley B (2000) Rational for use of phytoremediation In Raskin I, Ensley BD (eds)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Erdei L, Mezosi G, Mecs I, Vass I, Foglein F, Bulik L (2005) Phytoremediation as a program for decontamination of heavy-metal polluted environment. Acta Biol Szeged

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ndimele PE (2010) A review on the phytoremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon. Pak J Biol Sci

    Google Scholar 

  8. Delgadillo A, González C, Prieto F, Villagómez J, Acevedo O (2011) Fitorremediación: una alternativa para eliminar la contaminación. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aline Hernández .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hernández, A., Loera, N., Contreras, M., Fischer, L., Sánchez, D. (2019). Comparison Between Lactuca sativa L. and Lolium perenne: Phytoextraction Capacity of Ni, Fe, and Co from Galvanoplastic Industry. In: Wang, T., et al. Energy Technology 2019. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06209-5_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics