Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Managing Employee Well-being and Resilience for Innovation pp 95–174Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

Within-Case Qualitative Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 1294 Accesses

Abstract

Chapter 5 presents our qualitative analysis to inform our discussion and development of a conceptual framework in the final chapter. The qualitative case study design involves in-depth within-case analysis of interview and other secondary data from four highly innovative individuals and explores how meso- and micro-level influences affect achieving innovation outcomes. This chapter also presents the analysis and findings from each study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andreassen, C. S., Griffiths, M. D., Gjertsen, S. R., Krossbakken, E., Kvam, S., & Pallesen, S. (2013). The relationships between behavioral addictions and the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 2(2), 90–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldauf Jr., R. B., & Kaplan, R. B. (2011). Australian applied linguistics in relation to international trends. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 33(1), 04.1–04.32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital theory. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesenthal, C., & Wilden, R. (2014). Multi-level project governance: Trends and opportunities. International Journal of Project Management, 32(8), 1291–1308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, D. E., & Lawler III, E. E. (1992). The empowerment of service workers: What, why, how, and when. MIT Sloan Management Review, 33(3), 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boxall, P., & Macky, K. (2014). High-involvement work processes, work intensification and employee well-being. Work, Employment and Society, 28(6), 963–984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boxall, P., & Winterton, J. (2015). Which conditions foster high-involvement work processes? A synthesis of the literature and agenda for research. Economic and Industrial Democracy. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X15599584

  • Brailovskaia, J., & Margraf, J. (2017). Facebook Addiction Disorder (FAD) among German students—A longitudinal approach. PLoS One, 12(12), e0189719. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189719

    Google Scholar 

  • Brailovskaia, J., Teismann, T., & Margraf, J. (2018). Physical activity mediates the association between daily stress and Facebook Addiction Disorder (FAD)—A longitudinal approach among German students. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 199–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullough, A., Renko, M., & Myatt, T. (2014). Danger zone entrepreneurs: The importance of resilience and self-efficacy for entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(3), 473–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, C., Pitt, L., Parent, M., & Berthon, P. (2011). Understanding consumer conversations around ads in a web 2.0 world. Journal of Advertising, 40(1), 87–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmeli, A., & Gittell, J. H. (2009). High-quality relationships, psychological safety, and learning from failures in work organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(6), 709–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmeli, A., & Markman, G. D. (2011). Capture, governance, and resilience: Strategy implications from the history of Rome. Strategic Management Journal, 32(3), 322–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmeli, A., Yitzhak-Halevy, M., & Weisberg, J. (2009). The relationship between emotional intelligence and psychological well-being. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(1), 66–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtial, J. (1989). Qualitative models, quantitative tools and network analysis. Scientometrics, 15(5), 527–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cretchley, J., Rooney, D., & Gallois, C. (2010). Mapping a 40-year history with Leximancer: Themes and concepts in the Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41(3), 318–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dann, S. (2010). Redefining social marketing with contemporary commercial marketing definitions. Journal of Business Research, 63(2), 147–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, A., & Gadde, L. E. (2002). Systematic combining: An abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business Research, 55(7), 553–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P., & Wright, M. (2001). High-involvement work systems and performance outcomes: The strength of variable, contingent and context-bound relationships. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(4), 568–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehman, J., Glaser, V. L., Eisenhardt, K. M., Gioia, D., Langley, A., & Corley, K. G. (2017). Finding theory–method fit: A comparison of three qualitative approaches to theory building. Journal of Management Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492617706029

  • Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 1–28). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grech, M., Horberry, T., & Smith A. (2002) Human error in maritime operations: Analyses of accident reports using the Leximancer tool. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th Annual Meeting. Baltimore: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A., Smith, K., & Shalley, C. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 693–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, A. S., Wiklund, J., & Brundin, E. (2014). Individual responses to firm failure: Appraisals, grief, and the influence of prior failure experience. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junni, P., Sarala, R., Tarba, S. Y., Liu, Y., & Cooper, C. (2015). The role of human resources and organizational factors in ambidexterity. Human Resource Management, 54(S1), 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. E. (1986). High-involvement management: Participative strategies for improving organizational performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler III, E. E. (1988). Choosing an involvement strategy. Academy of Management Perspectives, 2(3), 197–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee-Baggeley, D., Preece, M., & DeLongis, A. (2005). Coping with interpersonal stress: Role of big five traits. Journal of Personality, 74, 9–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leximancer. (2018, April 12). Leximancer User Guide: Release 4.5. Leximancer Pty. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Hellsten, I. (2006). Measuring the meaning of words in contexts: An automated analysis of controversies about “monarch butterflies”, “frankenfoods”, and “stem cells”. Scientometrics, 67(2), 231–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liesch, P. W., Hakanson, L., McGaughey, S. L., Middleton, S., & Cretchley, J. (2011). The evolution of the international business field: A scientometric investigation of articles published in its premier journal. Scientometrics, 88(1), 17–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Wang, Z., & Lü, W. (2013). Resilience and affect balance as mediators between trait emotional intelligence and life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(7), 850–855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik, A. (2009). Training drivers, competitive strategy, and clients’ needs: Case studies of three business process outsourcing companies. Journal of European Industrial Training, 33(2 and 3), 160–177. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090590910939058

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik, A. (2018a). Strategic learning and development, Chapter 10. In A. Malik (Ed.), Strategic human resource management and employment relations: An international perspective. Singapore: Springer Nature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik, A. (2018b). Special topics in SHRM & ER, Chapter 14. In A. Malik (Ed.), Strategic human resource management and employment relations: An international perspective (pp. 141–154). Singapore: Springer Nature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik, A., Boyle, B., & Mitchell, R. (2017). Contextual ambidexterity and innovation in health care: The role of HRM. Personnel Review, 46(7), 1358–1380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik, A., Ngo, L., & Kingshott, R. (2018). Power, resource-dependencies and capabilities in intercultural B2B relationships. Journal of Services Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-01-2018-0006

  • Malik, A., & Nilakant, V. (2011). Extending the ‘size matters’ debate: Drivers of training in three business process outsourcing SMEs in India. Management Research Review, 34(1), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171111096504

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik, A., Pereira, V., & Tarba, S. (2017). The role of HRM practices in product development: Contextual ambidexterity in a US MNC’s subsidiary in India. International Journal of Human Resource Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1325388

  • Martin, N. J., & Rice, J. L. (2007). Profiling enterprise risks in large computer companies using the Leximancer software tool. Risk Management, 9(3), 188–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathies, C., & Burford, M. (2011). Customer service understanding: Gender differences of frontline employees. Managing Service Quality, 21(6), 636–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., & Teller, E. (1953). Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. Journal of Chemical Physics, 21(6), 1087–1092.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikroyannidis, A., & Theodoulidis, B. (2006). Heraclitus II: A framework for ontology management and evolution. Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (514–521). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netzer, O., Feldman, R., Goldenberg, J., & Fresko, M. (2012). Mine your own business: Market-structure surveillance through text mining. Marketing Science, 31(3), 521–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ordenes, F. V., Theodoulidis, B., Burton, J., Gruber, T., & Zaki, M. (2014). Analyzing customer experience feedback using text mining a linguistics-based approach. Journal of Service Research, 17(3), 278–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, 82(4), 74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C. E., Suci, G., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penley, J. A., & Tomaka, J. (2002). Associations among the Big Five, emotional responses, and coping with acute stress. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1215–1228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, C. (1998). Processes of a case study methodology for postgraduate research in marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 32(9/10), 785–802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raisch, S. (2008). Balanced structures: Designing organizations for profitable growth. Long Range Planning, 41(5), 483–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20(4), 685–695.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randhawa, K., Wilden, R., & Hohberger, J. (2016). A bibliometric review of open innovation: Setting a research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(6), 750–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raynor, D. A., & Levine, H. (2009). Associations between the five-factor model of personality and health behaviors among college students. Journal of American College Health, 58(1), 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooney, D. (2005). Knowledge, economy, technology and society: The politics of discourse. Telematics and Informatics, 22(4), 405–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, N., & Smith, A. E. (2005). Use of automated content analysis techniques for event image assessment. Tourism Recreation Research, 30(2), 87–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., & Humphreys, M. (2006). Evaluation of unsupervised semantic mapping of natural language with Leximancer concept mapping. Behaviour Research Methods, 38(2), 262–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowa, J. F. (2000). Knowledge representation: Logical, philosophical, and computational foundations (Vol. 13). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, M. (1996). Text and corpus analysis: Computer-assisted studies of language and culture. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A., & Helfat, C. E. (2009). Organizational linkages for surviving technological change: Complementary assets, middle management, and ambidexterity. Organization Science, 20(4), 718–739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellis, W. M. (1997). Application of a case study methodology. The Qualitative Report, 3(3), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. C., Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Brannen, M. Y. (2011). Explaining theoretical relationships in international business research: It’s about the arrows linking the boxes. Journal of International Business Studies, 42, 1073–1078.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M., & O’Reilly, C. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J., Sørensen, J. B., & Mitchell, T. R. (2007). The interplay between theory and method. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1145–1154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollrath, M. (2000). Personality and hassles among university students: A three-year longitudinal study. European Journal of Psychology, 14, 199–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilden, R., Akaka, M. A., Karpen, I. O., & Hohberger, J. (2017). The evolution and prospects of service-dominant logic: An investigation of past, present, and future research. Journal of Service Research, 20(4), 345–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilden, R., Devinney, T. M., & Dowling, G. R. (2016). The architecture of dynamic capability research identifying the building blocks of a configurational approach. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 997–1076.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilden, R., Hohberger, J., Devinney, T. M., & Lavie, D. (2018). Revisiting James March (1991): Whither exploration and exploitation? Strategic Organization. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127018765031

  • Wood, S., & de Menezes, L. M. (2011). High involvement management, high-performance work systems and well-being. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(7), 1586–1610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1994). Discovering the future of the case study. Method in evaluation research. Evaluation Practice, 15(3), 283–290.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business, University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Vidya S. Athota

  2. UoN Central Coast Business School, University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, NSW, Australia

    Ashish Malik

Authors
  1. Vidya S. Athota
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ashish Malik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vidya S. Athota .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Athota, V.S., Malik, A. (2019). Within-Case Qualitative Analysis. In: Managing Employee Well-being and Resilience for Innovation. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06188-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation