Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Theoretical Foundations of Resilience, Well-being and Innovation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Managing Employee Well-being and Resilience for Innovation

Abstract

This chapter explores the key themes and theoretical foundations of well-being, resilience and innovation. It reviews the existing research on the association between well-being and resilience, and provides a theoretical basis for how well-being and resilience influence innovation. It also explores the impact of personality traits and environmental factors on well-being and resilience. Additionally, other factors such as neuroplasticity and set-point happiness are briefly explored to establish a connection with well-being and resilience. Overall, this chapter establishes the micro-level theoretical understanding and sets the tone for meso-level influences in the next chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amabile, T. M. (1988). From individual creativity to organisational innovation. In K. Gronhaug & G. Kaufmann (Eds.), Innovation: A cross-disciplinary perspective. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations a state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297–1333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N. B., & Anderson, P. E. (2003). Emotional longevity: What really determines how long you live. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreassen, C. S., Griffiths, M. D., Gjertsen, S. R., Krossbakken, E., Kvam, S., & Pallesen, S. (2013). The relationships between behavioral addictions and the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 2(2), 90–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Humphrey, R. H. (1993). Emotional labor in service roles: The influence of identity. Academy of Management Review, 18, 88–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avey, J. B., Luthans, F., & Youseff, C. F. (2010). The addictive value of positive psychological capital on employee well-being over time. The Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15(1), 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axtell, C., Holman, D., & Wall, T. (2006). Promoting innovation: A change study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79, 509–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axtell, C. M., Holman, D. J., Unsworth, K. L., Wall, T. D., Waterson, P. E., & Harrington, E. (2000). Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 73, 265–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbuto, J. E., & Burbach, M. E. (2006). The emotional intelligence of transformational leaders: A field study. The Journal of Social Psychology, 146(1), 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begley, T. M., & Czajka, J. M. (1993). Panel analysis of moderating effects of commitment on job satisfaction, intent to quit, and health following organizational change. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 552–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A., Kofman, O., Livneh, U., & Henik, A. (2007). Multidisciplinary perspectives on attention and the development of self-regulation. Progress in Neurobiology, 82, 256–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, J., & Kremen, A. M. (1996). IQ and ego-resiliency: Conceptual and empirical connections and separateness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 349–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brailovskaia, J., & Margraf, J. (2017). Facebook Addiction Disorder (FAD) among German students—A longitudinal approach. PLoS One, 12(12), e0189719. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brailovskaia, J., Teismann, T., & Margraf, J. (2018). Physical activity mediates the association between daily stress and Facebook Addiction Disorder (FAD)—A longitudinal approach among German students. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 199–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickman, P., Coates, D., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (1978). Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 917–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buur, J., & Matthews, B. (2008). Participatory innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(3), 255–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, W. B. (1932). The wisdom of the body (pp. 218–242). New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmeli, A., Meitar, R., & Weisberg, J. (2006). Self-leadership skills and innovative behavior at work. International Journal of Manpower, 27(1), 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, A. S., & Hung, L. K. (2007). Randomized controlled trial of workplace-based rehabilitation for work-related rotator cuff disorder. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 17, 487–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coble, H. M., Gantt, D. L., & Mallinckrodt, B. (1996). Attachment, social competency, and the capacity to use social support. In G. R. Pierce, B. R. Sarason, & I. G. Sarason (Eds.), Plenum series on stress and coping. Handbook of social support and the family (pp. 141–172). New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Contrada, R. J. (1989). Type a behavior, personality hardiness, and cardiovascular responses to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 895–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1980). Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: Happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(4), 668–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dackert, I. (2010). The impact of team climate for innovation on well-being and stress in elderly care. Journal of Nursing Management, 19(3), 302–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahms, T. (2010). Resilience and risk management. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 25(2), 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2006). Phases of the adoption of innovation in organizations: Effects of environment, organization, and top managers. British Journal of Management, 17, 215–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damanpour, F., & Wischnevsky, D. J. (2006). Research on innovation in organizations: Distinguishing innovation-generating from innovation-adopting organizations. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 23(4), 269–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danner, D. D., Snowdon, D. A., & Friesen, W. V. (2001). Positive emotions in early life and longevity: Findings from the nun study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(5), 804–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, J. R. T., Payne, V. M., Connor, K. M., Foa, E. B., Rothbaum, B. O., Hertzberg, M. A., et al. (2005). Trauma, resilience, and saliostasis: Effects of treatment in post-traumatic stress disorder. International Clinical Psychopharmacology, 20, 43–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R. J., Kabat-Zinn, J., Schumacher, J., Rosenkranz, M., Muller, D., Santorelli, S., et al. (2003). Alterations in brain and immune function produced by mindfulness meditation. Psychosomatic Medicine, 65(4), 564–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R. J., & Lutz, A. (2008). Buddha’s brain: Neuroplasticity and meditation. Signal Processing Magazine, 25(1), 176–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewe, P. J., O’Driscoll, M. P., & Cooper, C. L. (2012). Theories of psychological stress at work. In R. J. Gatchel & I. Z. Schultz (Eds.), Handbook of occupational health and wellness (pp. 23–38). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Scollon, C. (2006). Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being. American Psychologist, 61(4), 305–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles. New York: Harper and Row, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K., & Martin, J. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelbrecht, H. J. (2014). A general model of the innovation—Subjective well-being nexus. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 24(2), 377–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelbrecht, H. J. (2018). The (social) innovation—Subjective well-being nexus: Subjective well-being impacts as an additional assessment metric of technological and social innovations. Innovation, 31(3), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss, N. J., & Saebi, T. (2017). Fifteen years of research on business model innovation: How far have we come, and where should we go? Journal of Management, 43(1), 200–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankl, V. E. (1992). Man’s search for meaning. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L. (2003). Positive emotions and upward spirals in organizations. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship. San Francisco: Berret-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L., Tugade, M. M., Waugh, C. E., & Larkin, G. R. (2003). What good are positive emotions in crises? A prospective study of resilience and emotions following the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11th, 2001. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 365–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glomb, M. T., Kammeyer-Mueller, D. J., & Rotundo, M. (2004). Emotional labor demands and compensating wage differentials. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 700–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, M. A. (1996). Innovative genius: A framework for relating individual and organisational intelligences to innovation. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1081–1111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godard, J. (2001). Beyond the high-performance paradigm? An analysis of variation in Canadian managerial perceptions of reform programme effectiveness. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 39, 25–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1999a). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 1–28). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1999b). International personality item pool: A scientific collaboratory for the development of advanced measures of personality traits and other individual differences. Retrieved February 24, 2010, from http://ipip.ori.org/newBigFive5broadTable.htm

  • Gumusluoglu, L., & Ilsev, A. (2009). Transformational leadership, creativity, and organizational innovation. Journal of Business Research, 62, 461–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J., & Kesebir, S. (2010). Morality. In S. T. Fiske, G. Lindzey, & D. T. Gilbert (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 797–832). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G., & Valikangas, L. (2003). The quest for resilience. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 52–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Headey, B. (2006). Revisions to dynamic equilibrium theory using panel data and panel regression methods. Social Indicators Research, 79, 369–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Headey, B. (2008). The set-point theory of well-being: Negative results and consequent revisions. Social Indicators Research, 85, 389–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herscovitch, L., & Meyer, J. P. (2002). Commitment to organizational change: Extension of a three-component model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 474–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. R. (1993). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, F.-Y., Huang, D.-H., Lin, H.-Y., & Chiu, S.-L. (2014). Analysis of the psychological traits, Facebook usage, and Facebook addiction model of Taiwanese university students. Telematics and Informatics, 31(4), 597–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, L., Ahlstrom, D., Lee, A., Chen, S., & Hsieh, M. (2016). High performance work systems, employee well-being, and job involvement: An empirical study. Personnel Review, 45(2), 296–314. https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-09-2014-0201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamrog, J., Vickers, M., & Bear, D. (2006). Building and sustaining a culture that supports innovation. Human Resource Planning, 29(3), 9–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (1999). Objective happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 3–25). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Krueger, B. A. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, S. C., & Snell, S. A. (2009). Intellectual capital architectures and ambidextrous learning: A framework for human resource management. Journal of Management Studies, 46(1), 65–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 169–211). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivimaki, M., & Kawachi, I. (2015). Work stress as risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Current Cardiology Reports, 17(9), 74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobasa, S. C. (1979). Stressful life events, personality, and health: An inquiry into hardiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kossek, E. E., & Perrigino, M. B. (2016). Resilience: A review using a grounded integrated occupational approach. The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 729–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. P. (2012). Accelerate! Harvard Business Review, 90(11), 43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristjansson, K. (2006). “Emotional intelligence” in the classroom? An Aristotelian critique. Educational Theory, 56(1), 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristjansson, K. (2010). Positive psychology and virtue: The troublesome issues. Review of General Psychology, 14(4), 296–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumpfer, K. L. (1999). Factors and processes contributing to resilience: The resilience framework. In M. D. Glantz & J. L. Johnson (Eds.), Resilience and development: Positive life adaptations (pp. 179–224). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuntz, J., Näswall, K., & Malinen, S. (2016). Resilient employees in resilient organizations: Flourishing beyond adversity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9, 456–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko, D. F. (2007). Entrepreneurial leadership for 21st century. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 13(4), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, D., & Cogan, N. (2016). Coping with work-related stressors and building resilience in mental health workers: A comparative focus group study using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 89, 474–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampel, J., Bhalla, A., & Jha, P. P. (2014). Does governance confer organisational resilience? Evidence from UK employee owned businesses. European Management Journal, 32(1), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2013.06.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1974). Psychological stress and coping in adaptation and illness. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 5, 321–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnenluecke, M. (2015). Resilience in business and management research: A review of influential publications and a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(1), 4–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Wang, Z. H., & Lu, W. (2013). Resilience and affect balance as mediators between trait emotional intelligence and life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(7), 850–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losada, M. F., & Heaphy, E. D. (2004). Positivity and connectivity. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(6), 740–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71(3), 543–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, A., Brefczynski-Lewis, J., Johnstone, T., & Davidson, R. J. (2008). Regulation of the neural circuitry of emotion by compassion meditation: Effects of meditative expertise. PLoS One, 3, e1897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lykken, D., & Tellegen, A. (1996). Happiness is a stochastic phenomenon. Psychological Science, 7, 186–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malik, A. (2013). Connecting work design and business ecosystems: Fostering innovation in information technology firms. Journal of Economic and Social Policy, 15, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik, A., & Nilakant, V. (2016). Knowledge integration mechanisms in high-technology business-to-business services vendors. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 14, 565–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56, 227–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masten, W., & Wright, M. O. (2009). Resilience over the lifespan. In J. W. Reich (Ed.), Handbook of adult resilience (pp. 213–237). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, D., Chan, A., Hodges, T., & Avolio, B. J. (2003). Developing the moral component of authentic leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 32(2), 247–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moenkemeyer, G., Hoegl, M., & Weiss, M. (2012). Innovator resilience potential: A process perspective of individual resilience as influenced by innovation project termination. Human Relations, 65(5), 627–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, R. (2005). APA’s resilience initiative. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36(3), 227–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norrish, J. M., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2008). Is the study of happiness a worthy scientific pursuit? Social Indicators Research, 87, 393–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, E. J., & Zammuto, R. F. (1995). From here to AMT success: How will we travel. In L. Gomez-Mejia & M. W. Lawless (Eds.), Advances in global high-technology management (Vol. 5, pp. 125–147). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, A. D., Bergeman, C. S., Bisconti, T. L., & Wallace, K. A. (2006). Psychological resilience, positive emotions, and successful adaptation to stress in later life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 730–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ongori, H., & Agolla, J. E. (2008). Occupational stress in organizations and its effects on organizational performance. Journal of Management Research, 8, 123–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrish, B. P., Cohen, L. H., & Laurenceau, J.-P. (2011). Prospective relationship between negative affective reactivity to daily stress and depressive symptoms. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 30(3), 270–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearsall, M. J., Ellis, A. P., & Stein, J. H. (2009). Coping with challenge and hindrance stressors in teams: Behavioral, cognitive, and affective outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(1), 18–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peccei, R. (2004). Human resource management and the search for the happy workplace. Inaugural address. Rotterdam: Erasmus Research Institute of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penley, J. A., & Tomaka, J. (2002). Associations among the big five, emotional responses, and coping with acute stress. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1215–1228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (2018). Dying for a Paycheck: Why the American way of business is injurious to people and companies. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieters, G. R., & Young, D. W. (1999). The ever changing organization: Creating the capacity for continuous change, learning, and improvement. Boca Raton, FL: St. Lucie Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D. (2014). Psychological well-being revisited: Advances in the science and practice of Eudaimonia. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 83, 10–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmutte, P. S., & Ryff, D. C. (1997). Personality and well-being: What is the connection? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 549–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, C. (2012). Is novelty always a good thing? Towards an evolutionary welfare economics. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 22(3), 585–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S. G., & Bruce, A. B. (1994). Determinants of innovative behaviour: Part model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfilment. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60, 410–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, J., Taylor, M. S., & Seo, M. G. (2012). Resources for change: The relationships of organizational inducements and psychological resilience to employees’ attitudes and behaviors toward organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 727–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snowdon, D. (2001). Aging with grace. New York: Bentam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwick, S. M., Bonanno, G. A., Masten, A. S., Panter-Brick, C., & Yehuda, R. (2014). Resilience definitions, theory, and challenges: Interdisciplinary perspectives. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 5. https://doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v5.25338

  • Steffens, N. K., Haslam, S. A., Kerschreiter, R., Schuh, S. C., & van Dick, R. (2014). Leaders enhance group members’ work engagement and reduce their burnout by crafting social identity. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(1–2), 173–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006). The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(1), 80–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stehnken, T., Muller, E., & Zenker, A. (2011). Happiness and innovation: Avenues for further research, evoREG Research Note #18, November, 6 pages. Retrieved March 30, 2018, from http://www.evoreg.eu/docs/files/shno/Note_evoREG_18.pdf

  • Stokols, D. (2000). Creating health promotive environments: Implications for theory and research. In D. Stokols & M. S. Jamner (Eds.), Promoting human wellness: New frontiers for research, practice, and policy. Berkeley, CA and London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tadić, D., Aleksić, A., Stefanović, M., & Arsovski, S. (2014). Evaluation and ranking of organizational resilience factors by using a two-step fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/418085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thulasimani, K., Duraisamy, M., & Rathinasabapathi, S. (2010). A study on work life balance amongst managers of garment units in Tamilnadu State, India. International Journal of Human Sciences, 7(2), 446.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Breda, A. D. (2016). Building resilient human service organizations. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 40(1), 62–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanhove, A. J., Herian, M. N., Perez, A. L. U., Harms, P. D., & Lester, P. B. (2016). Can resilience be developed at work? A meta-analytic review of resilience-building programme effectiveness. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 89, 278–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vence, E. D., Roberson, J. A., McGuinnies, M. T., & Fazel, L. P. (2010). How neuroplasticity and cognitive reserve protect cognitive functioning. Journal of Psychological Nursing, 48(4), 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollrath, M. (2000). Personality and hassles among university students: A three-year longitudinal study. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 14, 199–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddell, G., & Burton, K. (2006). Is work good for your health and well-being. London: Department of Work and Pensions, HM Government, The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R. M. (2008). An empirical evaluation of innovation types and organizational and environmental characteristics: Towards a configuration framework. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 18(4), 591–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, M. (2014). Resilience and responsibility: Governing uncertainty in a complex world. The Geographical Journal, 180(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1990). Innovation at work. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work (pp. 3–13). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. (1967). Correlates of avowed happiness. Psychological Bulletin, 67(4), 294–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zellars, K. L., Justice, L., & Beck, T. E. (2011). Resilience: New paths for building and sustaining individual and organizational capacity. In P. L. Perrewé & D. C. Ganster (Eds.), Research in occupational stress and well being (Vol. 9, pp. 1–37). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-3555(2011)0000009005

  • Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2003). Awakening employee creativity: The role of leader emotional intelligence. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 545–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business, University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Vidya S. Athota

  2. UoN Central Coast Business School, University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, NSW, Australia

    Ashish Malik

Authors
  1. Vidya S. Athota
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ashish Malik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vidya S. Athota .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Athota, V.S., Malik, A. (2019). Theoretical Foundations of Resilience, Well-being and Innovation. In: Managing Employee Well-being and Resilience for Innovation. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06188-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation