Skip to main content

Exploring Requirements for Joint Information Sharing in Neighbourhoods: Local Playgrounds in The Hague

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Interactivity, Game Creation, Design, Learning, and Innovation (ArtsIT 2018, DLI 2018)

Abstract

Resilient communities are an important prerequisite to reach urban resilience. In such communities, citizens need to be able to participate for improving liveability and safety of their environment. The playable city, where participation is key, provides the environment for this process to unfold. This paper researches requirements for the design of playgrounds: environments for open interaction and collaboration, as part of the playable city. Two workshops were organised in two neighbourhoods in The Hague to explore specific citizen preferences for playground design. Neighbourhood locations and the type of information citizens would like to discover, share, and create are identified, in particular with respect to healthcare, safety and social engagement. The implications of these requirements are presented and discussed with design options which exemplify how playgrounds in the city enable joined information sharing, creation, interaction, and collaboration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This paper reports on research performed within the context of the project BART!, that aims to improve coordination and collaboration between citizens, municipality, and police through co-creation, to increase safety and liveability of The Hague.

  2. 2.

    Note that this paper does not focus on resilience towards crises as in shocks, but rather on the ability of communities to respond to long-term crises/challenges and trends as they emerge.

References

  1. 100 Resilient Cities: What is Urban Resilience? (2018). http://www.100resilientcities.org/resources/#section-4

  2. AECOM: The Hague 100 Resilient Cities: Preliminary Resilience Assessment. Technical report, Resilient The Hague, Den Haag (2018). http://100resilientcities.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/The-Hague-PRA-English.pdf

  3. Angus, A., et al.: Urban social tapestries. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 7(4), 44–51 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2008.84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Asad, M., Le Dantec, C.A.: Illegitimate civic participation: supporting community activists on the ground. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, pp. 1694–1703. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Balestrini, M., Marshall, P., Cornejo, R., Tentori, M., Bird, J., Rogers, Y.: Jokebox: coordinating shared encounters in public spaces. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, pp. 38–49. ACM (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2835203

  6. Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3(2), 77–101 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cila, N., Jansen, G., den Broeder, L., Groen, M., Meys, W., Kröse, B.: Look! a healthy neighbourhood: means to motivate participants in using an app for monitoring community health. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 889–898. ACM (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2851591

  8. Comes, T.: Designing for networked community resilience. Procedia Eng. 159, 6–11 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fonseca, X., Lukosch, S., Lukosch, H., Tiemersma, S., Brazier, F.: Requirements and game ideas for social interaction in mobile outdoor games. In: CHI PLAY 2017 Extended Abstracts, pp. 331–337. ACM Press, Amsterdam (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3130859.3131304

  10. Foth, M., Choi, J.H., Satchell, C.: Urban informatics. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 1–8. ACM, Hangzhou (2011). https://eprints.qut.edu.au/39159/1/39159.pdf

  11. Gaventa, J.: Representation, community leadership and participation: citizen involvement in neighbourhood renewal and local governance. Technical report, July, Office of Deputy Prime Minister (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jennissen, R., Engbersen, G., Bokhorst, M., Bovens, M.: De nieuwe verscheidenheid. Toenemende diversiteit naar herkomst in Nederland. Technical report, Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid, Den Haag (2018). https://www.wrr.nl/publicaties/verkenningen/2018/05/29/de-nieuwe-verscheidenheid

  13. Kleinhans, R., Van Ham, M., Evans-Cowley, J.: Using social media and mobile technologies to foster engagement and self-organization in participatory urban planning and neighbourhood governance. Plan. Pract. Res. 30(3), 237–247 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2015.1051320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. de Lange, M., de Waal, M.: Owning the city: new media and citizen engagement in urban design. First Monday 18(11) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nijholt, A.: Designing humor for playable cities. Procedia Manufact. 3, 2175–2182 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nijholt, A.: Playable Cities: The City as a Digital Playground. Springer, Singapore (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1962-3

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Putnam, R.D.: Bowling alone. J. Democr. 6, 65–78 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Scolere, L.M., Baumer, E.P.S., Reynolds, L., Gay, G.: Building mood, building community: usage patterns of an interactive art installation. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Supporting Group Work, pp. 201–212 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2957276.2957291

  19. Teddlie, C., Yu, F.: Mixed methods sampling: a typology with examples. J. Mixed Methods Res. 1(1), 77–100 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806292430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. The Rockefeller Foundation, Arup: City Resilience Framework. Technical report, The Rockefeller Foundation, Arup (2014). https://assets.rockefellerfoundation.org/app/uploads/20140410162455/City-Resilience-Framework-2015.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is part of the project BART! and received funding from the Municipality of The Hague and the National Police.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geertje Slingerland .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Slingerland, G., Lukosch, S., Comes, T., Brazier, F. (2019). Exploring Requirements for Joint Information Sharing in Neighbourhoods: Local Playgrounds in The Hague. In: Brooks, A., Brooks, E., Sylla, C. (eds) Interactivity, Game Creation, Design, Learning, and Innovation. ArtsIT DLI 2018 2018. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 265. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06134-0_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06134-0_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-06133-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-06134-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics