Advertisement

Editorial Conclusion—Where Do We Go from Here?

  • Sergio SayagoEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Human–Computer Interaction Series book series (HCIS)

Abstract

To wrap up this book, I recap its two main objectives and present a succinct summary of the key findings. One of the objectives of this book was to promote a critical reflection about the research conducted in HCI with older people thus far. This book does not intend to provide a full, comprehensive and systematic review of the field.

References

  1. Alan J, Leigh M, Druin A (2012) Methods and techniques for involving children in the design of new technology for children. Found Trends Hum Comput Interact 6(2):85–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbosa, B, Vetere, F (Eds) (2019, in print) Ageing and digital technology: designing and evaluating emerging technologies for older adults. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  3. Bengtson V, Settersten R (eds) (2016) Handbook of theories of aging. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Brewer R, Piper AM (2016) “Tell it like it really is”: a case of online content creation and sharing among older adult bloggers. In: Proceeding of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systemsGoogle Scholar
  5. Carstensen LL (2011) A long bright future. Happiness, health, and finanicial security in an age of increased longevity. Public Affairs, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark L, Doyle P, Garaialde D et al (in print) The state of speech in HCI: trends, themes, and challenges. Interact Comput. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1810.06828
  7. Dickinson A, Arnott J, Prior S (2007) Methods for human-computer interaction research with older people. Behav Inf Technol 26(4):343–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dougherty D (2012) The maker movement. Innovations 7(3):11–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ferreira SM, Sayago S, Blat J (2017) Older people’s production and appropriation of digital videos: an ethnographic study. Behav Inf Technol 36(6):557–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Franz R, Munteanu C, Neves BB et al (2015) Time to retire old methodologies? Reflecting on conducting usability evaluations with older adults. In: MobileHCI, pp 912–915Google Scholar
  11. Guo P (2018) Older adults learning computer programming: motivations, frustrations, and design opportunities. In: CHI 2017, Denver, Colorado, p 7070Google Scholar
  12. Hanson V (2009) Age and web access: the next generation. In: W4A 2009 proceedings of the 2009 international cross-disciplinary conference on web accessibililty (W4A), vol 44, pp 7–15.  https://doi.org/10.1145/1535654.1535658
  13. Hofer S, Alwin D (2008) Handbook of cognitive aging. interdisciplinary perspectives. Sage, USAGoogle Scholar
  14. Lazar J, Heidi J, Hochheiser H (2017) Research methods in human-computer interaction. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, USGoogle Scholar
  15. Nelson T (ed) (2002) Ageism: stereotyping and prejudice against older persons. The MIT Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Rogers Y (2012) HCI theory. Classical, modern, and contemporary. Morgan & Claypool, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sayago S, Sloan D, Blat J (2011) Everyday use of computer-mediated communication tools and its evolution over time: an ethnographical study with older people. Interact Comput 23(5):543–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Settersten R, Godlewski B (2016) Concepts and theories of age and aging. In: Bengtson V, Settersten R (eds) Handbook of theories of ageing. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Schneider H, Eiband M, Ullrich D et al (2018) Empowerment in HCI—a survey and framework. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems—CHI 2018, pp 1–14Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universitat de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations