Advertisement

Designing for the Informatics Lifecourse and Ageing in Place

  • Noah LenstraEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Human–Computer Interaction Series book series (HCIS)

Abstract

This chapter integrates and builds on these two recent strands of HCI research focused on designing for and with older adults: (1) Examining how ageing members of particular communities appropriate technology and (2) Examining how technology practices of ageing adults evolve over time based on their diverse life experiences. Ethnographic fieldwork conducted during one year working with older adults learning technology in senior centres and public libraries found that knitting together these two topics required a new concept: the informatics lifecourse. This concept refers to how a person learns technology throughout the stages of his or her life as he or she ages in place. To understand how to design for the informatics lifecourse, this chapter focuses on three dimensions that shape how communities of older adults appropriate and use technology over time: (1) historically shaped subcommunities, (2) the availability of technology support within those communities, and (3) ageism. A conclusion suggests additional research needed to understand how to design technological infrastructures to support ageing in place.

References

  1. Anderson M, Perrin A (2017) Tech adoption climbs among older adults. Pew Research Centre. http://pewrsr.ch/2pWRh2J. Accessed 24 Feb 2018
  2. Blomberg J, Karasti H (2013) Reflections on 25 years of ethnography in CSCW. Comput Support Coop Work (CSCW) 22(4–6):373–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Botero A, Hyysalo S (2013) Ageing together: steps towards evolutionary co-design in everyday practices. CoDesign 9(1):37–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burawoy M (1998) The extended case method. Sociol Theory 16(1):4–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (2017) Healthy Places Terminology Atlanta, CDC. https://www.cdc.gov/healthyplaces/terminology.htm. Accessed 24 Feb 2018
  6. Charmaz K (2012) Constructing grounded theory. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  7. Cole TR (1992) The journey of life: a cultural history of ageing in America. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Crabtree A, Nichols DM, O’Brien J et al (2000) Ethnomethodologically informed ethnography and information system design. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 51(7):666–682Google Scholar
  9. Dourish P (2001) Where the action is. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Gardner PJ, Kamber T, Netherland J (2012) “Getting Turned On”: Using ICT training to promote active ageing in New York City. J Community Inform 8(1). http://www.ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/809/907
  11. Hardill I (2014) The intergenerational help desk: encouraging ICT use in older adults in England. In: Vanderbeck R, Worth N (eds) Intergenerational space. Routledge, Lon-don, pp 273–285Google Scholar
  12. Hooyman NR, Kiyak HA (2011) Social gerontology: a multi-disciplinary perspective. 9th edn. Pearson Education, BostonGoogle Scholar
  13. Hutchison ED (2014) Dimensions of human behaviour: the changing life course. 5th edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  14. Lenstra N (2016) The community informatics of an ageing society: a comparative case study of senior centres and public libraries. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  15. Lenstra N (2017) Agency and ageism in the community-based technology support services used by older adults. First Monday 22(8)Google Scholar
  16. Lenstra N, Baker KS (2017) The intermediation of community and infrastructure. Libr Trends 65(4):473–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McKee H, Blair K (2006) Older adults and community-based technological literacy programs: barriers and benefits to learning. Community Lit J 1(2):13–39Google Scholar
  18. Olphert W, Damodaran L (2013) Older people and digital disengagement: a fourth digital divide? Gerontology 59(6):564–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Peek ST, Luijkx KG, Rijnaard MD et al (2016) Older adults’ reasons for using technology while ageing in place. Gerontology 62(2):226–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Righi V, Sayago S, Blat J (2017) When we talk about older people in HCI, who are we talking about? Towards a ‘turn to community’ in the design of technologies for a growing ageing population. Int J Hum-Comput Stud 108:15–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rogers WA, Mitzner TL (2017) Envisioning the future for older adults: autonomy, health, well-being, and social connectedness with technology support. Futures 87:133–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rogers Y, Paay J, Brereton M et al (2014) Never too old: engaging retired people inventing the future with MaKey MaKey. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, pp 3913–3922Google Scholar
  23. Sayago S, Blat J (2010) Telling the story of older people e-mailing: an ethnographical study. Int J Hum-Comput Stud 68(1–2):105–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Settersten RA (2003) Invitation to the life course: toward new understandings of later life. Baywood Publishing Company, Amityville, NYGoogle Scholar
  25. Silvast A (2015) An oral history of programming practices: Gender and age dynamics and digital (dis)engagement among computer programmers in Finland. Hum Technol 11(1):4–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Silver MP (2014) Socio-economic status over the lifecourse and internet use in older adulthood. Ageing Soc 34(6):1019–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Suchman LA (1987) Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Vasunilashorn S, Steinman BA, Liebig PS et al (2012) Ageing in place: evolution of a research topic whose time has come. J Ageing Res 2012:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vines J, Pritchard G, Wright P et al (2015) An age-old problem: examining the discourses of ageing in HCI and strategies for future research. ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact (TOCHI) 22(1):2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wildevuur S, van Dijk D, Hammer-Jakobsen T et al (eds) (2013) Connect: design for an empathic society. BIS Publishers, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  31. Williams K (2012) Informatics moments. Libr Q 82(1):47–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Xie B, Jaeger PT (2008) Computer training programs for older adults at the public library. Public Libr 47(5):42–49Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of North Carolina at GreensboroGreensboroUSA

Personalised recommendations