Abstract
The ideational turn in new institutionalism is by far the most recent and has the potential to examine public policy decisions regardless of political, societal, and socioeconomic conditions. Recent theoretical advancements in ideational institutionalism have built enough foundation on which institutional analysis could be sufficiently carried out in countries of the Global South that do not necessarily present facets of pluralistic societies or of well-established liberal democracies. This introductory chapter advances theoretical application of ideational institutionalism by building conceptual clarity on types of ideas, their origin, and the mechanism through which they affect public policy outcomes. It builds further on the existing institutional scholarship and presents an ideational framework of public policy for understanding the mechanism through which ideas originate and affect public policy outcomes. The framework allows categorization of different types of ideas as per their influence on the policy process and its outcomes. The framework rests on discursive means and practices that are originated and constituted by “text,” ‘agency,” and the “structural context” and result in the construction of ideas. This forms the basis for policy deliberations and decisions, central to how policy makers conceive and evaluate their options and how and what they decide. It is contended that ideational institutionalism has the capacity to inform an endogenous account of complex institutional evolution, continuation, adaptation, and innovation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allmendinger, P. (2011). New labour and planning: From new right to new left. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Bacchi, C. L. (2000). Policy as discourse: What does it mean? Where does it get us? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 21(1), 45–57.
Barbaros, C. (2012). Do issues decide? Thematic and partisan ideational strategies in electoral debates. Argumentum Journal, 10(1), 113–132.
Béland, D. (2010). The idea of power and role of ideas. Political Studies Review, 8(2), 145–154.
Béland, D., & Cox, R. H. (2011). Ideas and politics. In D. Béland & R. H. Cox (Eds.), Ideas and politics in social science research (pp. 3–22). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bell, S. (2011). Do we really need a new ‘constructivist institutionalism’ to explain institutional change? British Journal of Political Science, 41(4), 883–906.
Blyth, M. M. (1997). Any more bright ideas? The ideational turn of comparative political economy. Comparative Politics, 29(2), 229–250.
Blyth, M. M. (2002). Great transformation: Economic ideas and institutional change in the twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cairney, P. (2012). Understanding public policy: Theories and issues. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
Campbell, J. L. (1998). Institutional analysis and the role of ideas in political economy. Theory and Society, 27(3), 377–409.
Campbell, J. L. (2002). Ideas, politics, and public policy. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 21–38.
Campbell, J. L. (2004). Institutional change and globalization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Campbell, J. L. (2008). What do we know – or not – about ideas or politics? In P. Nedergaard & J. L. Campbell (Eds.), Politics and institutions (pp. 157–176). Copenhagen: DJOEF.
Campbell, J. L. (2010). Institutional reproduction and change. In G. Morgan, J. L. Campbell, C. Crouch, O. K. Pederson, & R. Whitley (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative institutional analysis (pp. 87–115). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Daugherty, R., & Ecclestone, K. (2006). Constructing assessment for learning in the UK policy environment. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 149–168). London: Sage.
Fiorina Morris, P. (1995). Rational choice and the new (?) institutionalism. Polity, 28(1), 107–115.
Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge (A. M. Sheridan Smith, Trans.). London: Tavistock.
Gooby-Taylor, P. (2005). Ideas and policy change. In P. Taylor-Gooby (Ed.), Ideas and welfare sate reform in western Europe (pp. 1–11). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Goodwin, N. (1996). Governmentality in the Queensland department of education: Policies and the management of schools. Discourse, 17(1), 65–74.
Goodwin, S. (2012). Women, policy and politics: Recasting policy studies. In A. Bletsas & C. Beasley (Eds.), Engaging with Carol Bacchi: Strategic interventions and exchanges (pp. 25–36). Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press.
Greenberg, G. D., Miller, J. A., Mohr, L. B., & Vladeck, B. C. (1977). Developing public policy theory: Perspectives from empirical research. American Political Science Association, 71(4), 1532–1543.
Hass, P. (1989). Do regimes matter? Epistemic communities and Mediterranean pollution control. International Organization, 43(3), 377–403.
Hay, C. (2006). Constructivist institutionalism. In R. A. W. Rhodes, S. A. Binder, & B. A. Rockman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political institutions (pp. 56–74). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hay, C., & Wincott, D. (1998). Structure, agency and historical institutionalism. Political Studies, 46(4), 951–957.
Jobert, B. (1989). The normative framework of public policy. Political Studies, 37(3), 376–386.
Jobert, B., & Muller, P. (1987). L’Etat en Action: Politique publiques et corporatismes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France Paris.
John, P. (2003). Is there life after policy streams, advocacy coalitions and punctuations: Using evolutionary theory to explain policy change? The Policy Studies Journal, 31(4), 481–498.
Koelble, T. A. (1995). The new institutionalism in political science and sociology. Comparative Politics, 27(2), 231–243.
Kritzman, L. D. (Ed.). (1988). M. Foucault: Politics, philosophy, culture: Interviews and other writings 1977–1984. New York: Routledge.
Lieberman, R. C. (2002). Ideas, institutions and political order: Explaining political change. The American Political Science Review, 96(4), 697–712.
McCool, D. C. (1995). Public policy, theories, models and concepts: An anthology. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Muller, P., & Surel, Y. (1998). L’analyse des Politiques Publiques. Paris: Editions Montchrestien.
Nee, V., & Ingram, P. (1998). Embeddedness and beyond: Institutions, exchange, and social structure. In M. C. Brinton & V. Nee (Eds.), The new institutionalism in sociology (pp. 19–45). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Nelson, B. J. (1998). Public policy and administration: An overview. In R. E. Goodin & H.-D. Klingemann (Eds.), A new handbook on political science (pp. 551–592). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Osman, F. A. (2002). Public policy making: Theories and their implications in developing countries. Asian Affairs, 24(3), 38–52.
Phoenix, A. (2009). Enabling research? Silencing and recognition in social research. In J. Satterthwiate, H. Piper, & P. Sikes (Eds.), Power in the academy (pp. 61–78). London: Trentham Books.
Russell, J., Greenhalgh, T., Byrne, E., & McDonnell, J. (2008). Recognizing rhetoric in health care policy analysis. Journal of Health Sciences Research and Policy, 13(1), 40–46.
Sabatier, P. A. (1991). Toward better theories of the policy process. Political Science and Politics, 24(2), 147–156.
Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (Eds.). (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder: Westview Press.
Schmidt, V. A. (2006). Institutionalism. In C. Hay, M. Lister, & D. Marsh (Eds.), The state: Theories and issues (pp. 98–117). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 303–326.
Schmidt, V. A. (2010). Taking ideas and discourse seriously: Explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘New Institutionalism’. European Political Science Review, 2(1), 1–25.
Schmidt, V. A. (2012). Discursive institutionalism. In F. Fischer & H. Gottweis (Eds.), The argumentative turn revisited: Public policy as communicative practice (pp. 85–113). Durham: Duke University Press.
Shaw, S. E. (2010). Reaching the parts that other theories and methods can’t reach: How and why a policy-as-discourse approach can inform health-related policy. Health, 14(2), 196–212.
Simoulin, V. (2000). Emission, médiation, réception… Les opérations constitutives d’une réforme par impregnation. Revue Française de Science Politique, 50(2), 333–350.
Smith, K. E., & Ketikireddi, S. V. (2013). A glossary of theories for understanding policymaking. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 67(2), 198–202.
Smith, R. M. (1995). Ideas, institutions, and strategic choices. Polity, 28(1), 135–140.
Wentzel, J. (2011). An imperative to adjust: Skill formation in England and Germany. Heidelberg: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Butt, A.I. (2019). Public Policy and Ideation. In: Grimm, H.M. (eds) Public Policy Research in the Global South. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06061-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06061-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-06060-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-06061-9
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)