Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Legal Aspects Relating to Satellite Constellations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Legal Aspects Around Satellite Constellations

Part of the book series: Studies in Space Policy ((STUDSPACE,volume 19))

  • 876 Accesses

Abstract

Satellite constellations represent a new paradigm of space activities, with vast numbers of smaller satellites operated in the so-called NewSpace industry. With the tide of potential applications and benefits to mankind come risks, notably that of the increased population of low Earth orbit and potential for increases in space debris. This article discusses the legal ramifications of the proposed constellations, including the current legal framework around space debris and collisions, and potential challenges, including lack of legal definitions for space debris and fault making liability difficult to prove. Potential mechanisms for clarification are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Planet Labs Inc ‘Frequently Asked Questions’ <https://www.planet.com/faqs/> accessed 28th September 2018.

  2. 2.

    Federal Communications Commission (2017) ‘News Release: FCC Grants OneWeb Access to U.S. Market for its Proposed New Broadband Satellite Constellation’ <https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-345467A1.docx> accessed 21st September 2018.

  3. 3.

    FCC News Release (2018) ‘FCC Authorises SpaceX to Provide Broadband Services via Satellite Constellation’ <https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-345467A1.docx> accessed 21st September 2018.

  4. 4.

    Union of Concerned Scientists currently tracks 1800 satellites—many of these are in geostationary orbits, so the multiplier for low Earth orbit satellites would be much larger.

  5. 5.

    Satellite Applications Catapult, ‘Small Satellite Market Intelligence Report’ (2017) Q4 <https://sa.catapult.org.uk/2018/08/01/small-satellite-market-intelligence/> accessed 21st September 2018.

  6. 6.

    Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee (IADC) ‘Space Debris Mitigation Guidelines’ [2007] < https://www.iadc-online.org/index.cgi?item=docs_pub> accessed 22th September 2018.

  7. 7.

    United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs, 2007, ‘Space Debris Mitigation Guidelines of the Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space’ 2007 <www.unoosa.org/pdf/publications/st_space_49E.pdf> accessed 21st September 2018.

  8. 8.

    National Aeronautics and Space Administration ‘Orbital Debris Quarterly News’ 2018 22(1) <www.orbitaldebris.jsc.nasa.gov/quarterly-news/pdfs/odqnv22i1.pdf> accessed 21st September 2018.

  9. 9.

    T.A. Aadithya ‘Review Paper on Orbital Debris Mitigation and Removal and a New Model Insight’ [2015] IJEEDC <www.researchgate.net/publication/281722682_Review_Paper_On_Orbital_Debris_Mitigation_And_Removal_And_A_New_Model_Insight> accessed 21st September 2018.

  10. 10.

    IADC ‘IADC Assessment Report for 2010’ [2013] < https://www.iadc-online.org/Documents/IADC-2011-04,%20IADC%20Annual%20Report%20for%202010.pdf> accessed 27th September 2018.

  11. 11.

    Based on 1886 satellites and 20,000 tracked objects, see Union of Concerned Scientists ‘UCS Satellite Database’ [2018] <https://www.ucsusa.org/nuclear-weapons/space-weapons/satellite-database?_ga=2.235743042.294627627.1538140743-1592752914.1538140743#.W64qTtNKiHt> accessed 27th September 2018.

  12. 12.

    Mark Harris ‘FCC Accuses Stealthy Startup of Launching Rogue Satellites’ [2018] IEEE Spectrum <https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/aerospace/satellites/fcc-accuses-stealthy-startup-of-launching-rogue-satellites> accessed 21st September 2018.

  13. 13.

    Matthew Kleiman ‘Space Law 101: An Introduction to Space Law’ [undated] American Bar Association <www.americanbar.org/groups/young_lawyers/publications/the_101_201_practice_series/space_law_101_an_introduction_to_space_law.html> accessed 24th September 2018.

  14. 14.

    United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, Including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies (hereinafter Outer Space Treaty) [1966].

  15. 15.

    United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs Convention on the International Liability for Damaged Caused by Space Objects (hereinafter Liability Convention) [1971].

  16. 16.

    Ma Xinmin ‘The Development of Space Law: Framework, Objectives and Orientations’ [2014] UN/China/APSCO Workshop on Space Law <www.unoosa.org/documents/pdf/spacelaw/activities/2014/splaw2014-keynote.pdf> accessed 24th September 2018.

  17. 17.

    Secure World Foundation ‘Space Sustainability: A Practical Guide’ [2014] <https://swfound.org/media/121399/swf_space_sustainability-a_practical_guide_2014__1_.pdf> accessed 24th September 2018.

  18. 18.

    Joanne Gabrynowicz ‘A Chronological Survey of the Development of Art. IX of the Outer Space Treaty’ [2010] Supplement to Journal of Space Law, University of Mississippi School of Law <www.spacelaw.olemiss.edu/resources/pdfs/article-ix.pdf> accessed 24th September 2018.

  19. 19.

    Ram Jakhu ‘Iridium-Cosmos Collision and its Implications for Space Operations’ in ESPI Yearbook on Space Policy. 2008/2009: Setting New Trends 254 (Springer Wien New York 2010).

  20. 20.

    IADC (n 7) 5.

  21. 21.

    IADC ‘An Overview of the IADC Annual Activities’ [2017] <https://www.iadc-online.org/Documents/IADC-17-02%20UN%20COPUOS%20STSC%20Presentation%20-%2021.12.2016.pdf> accessed 27th September 2018.

  22. 22.

    UN GA COPOUS ‘Report of the Legal Subcommittee on its fifty-seventh session’ [2018] A/AC.105/1177 <https://cms.unov.org/dcpms2/api/finaldocuments?Language=en&Symbol=A/AC.105/1177> accessed 24th September 2018.

  23. 23.

    National Aeronautics and Space Administration ‘Handbook for Limiting Orbital Debris’ 2008 <https://explorers.larc.nasa.gov/APMIDEX2016/MO/pdf_files/NHBK871914.pdf> accessed 27th September 2018.

  24. 24.

    Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee ‘Statement on Large Constellations of Satellites in Low Earth Orbit’ 2017 <https://www.iadc-online.org/Documents/IADC%20Statement%20on%20Large%20Constellations%20rev%203.pdf> accessed 25th September 2018.

  25. 25.

    Secure World Foundation ‘2009 Iridium-Cosmos Collision Fact Sheet’ [2010] <https://swfound.org/media/6575/swf_iridium_cosmos_collision_fact_sheet_updated_2012.pdf> accessed 25th September 2018.

  26. 26.

    Michael Listner ‘Iridium 33 and Cosmos 2251 three years later: where are we now?’ [2012] <http://www.thespacereview.com/article/2023/1> accessed 26th September 2018.

  27. 27.

    Black’s Law Dictionary (8th ed. 2004), 641.

  28. 28.

    John Campbell ‘Forum on National Security Space Examining Codes and Rules for Space’ [2017] <www.researchgate.net/publication/242327287_Forum_on_National_Security_Space_Examining_Codes_and_Rules_for_Space> accessed 27th September 2018.

  29. 29.

    Frans von der Dunk ‘Too-Close Encounters of the Third Party Kind: Will the Liability Convention Stand the Test of the Cosmos 2251-Iridium 33 Collision?’ [2010] Space, Cyber, and Telecommunications Law Program Faculty Publications 28 <https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1027&context=spacelaw> accessed 24th September 2018.

  30. 30.

    UNCOPOUS General Assembly A/AC.105/1177 [2018].

  31. 31.

    Jeff Foust ‘Mega-Constellations and Mega- Debris’ [2016] The Space Review <http://www.thespacereview.com/article/3078/1> accessed 25th September 2018.

  32. 32.

    United Nations, ‘Charter of the United Nations and Statute of the International Court of Justice’ [1945] Article 38(1)(b).

  33. 33.

    Nicaragua v. United States of America International Court of Justice [1986] <www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/70/070-19860627-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf> accessed 26th September 2018.

  34. 34.

    Scott Kerr ‘Liability for Space Debris Collisions and the Kessler Syndrome’ [2017] <http://www.thespacereview.com/article/3387/1> accessed 26th September 2018.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

    Ewan Wright

  2. Satellite Applications Catapult, Harwell, UK

    Ewan Wright

Authors
  1. Ewan Wright
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. European Space Policy Institute, Vienna, Austria

    Annette Froehlich

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wright, E. (2019). Legal Aspects Relating to Satellite Constellations. In: Froehlich, A. (eds) Legal Aspects Around Satellite Constellations. Studies in Space Policy, vol 19. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06028-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06028-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-06027-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-06028-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation