Skip to main content

Goal-Oriented Analysis and Design of Land Administration Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 936))

Abstract

Land administration systems involve many complex processes in order to properly manage rights over land, estimate its value, gather related revenues and regulate its use. Reaching those goals generally relies on land registration and cadastre subsystems with many different variants observed across countries. Although elaborated domain models are available and are good at capturing the domain structure, they leave the design rationales quite implicit. This limits the understanding and reasoning capabilities on the systems, e.g. when some process do not correctly reach its goals. This paper proposes a way to extend such domain models with a goal dimension in order to provide a better guidance in the design of new systems and a better understanding of existing systems. Our approach is based on goal-oriented analysis techniques extended with specific spatio-temporal notations, patterns and decomposition rules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. UNECE: Land Administration Guidelines With Special Reference to Countries in Transition. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Henssen, J.: Basic principles of the main cadastral systems in the world. In: Proceedings of Seminar Modern Cadastres and Cadastral Innovations, FIG Commission 7 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yavuz, A.: A comparative analysis of cadastral systems in the EU countries according to basic selected criteria. In: FIG Working Week (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tuladhar, A.: Reengineering cadastre and land registration systems and business opportunities. In: FIG Working Week and 125th Anniversary, Still on the Frontline, 13–17 April, Paris (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dale, P., McLaughlin, J.: Land Administration. Spatial Information Systems Series. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hespanha, J., da Fonseca Hespanha de Oliveira, J., van Oosterom, P., Zevenbergen, J.: Development methodology for an integrated legal cadastre: deriving Portugal country profile from the land administration domain model. NCG (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Enemark, S., et al.: Fit-For-Purpose Land Administration: Joint FIG. FIG, San Francisco (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Asiama, S., et al.: Tools to support transparency in land administration, Training package: Toolkit. UN-HABITAT (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Williamson, I.P.: Best practices for land administration systems in developing countries. World Bank Other Operational Studies 16732, The World Bank (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. van Lamsweerde, A.: Goal-oriented requirements engineering: a guided tour. In: 5th IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ponsard, C., Touzani, M.: Extending land administration domain models with a goal perspective. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Geographical Information Systems Theory, Applications and Management (GISTAM), 27–28 April, Porto, Portugal (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zakout, W., Wehrmann, B., Torhonen, M.P.: Good government in land administration principles and good practices. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) World Bank, Rome (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Van Oosterom, P., Lemmen, C.: Proposal to establish a core cadastral data model. In: 3rd International Workshop ‘Towards a Cadastral Core Domain Model’ of COST action G9 ‘Modelling Real Property Transactions’, 10–12 October, Delft (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lemmen, C., Oosterom, P.V.: Version 1.0 of the FIG core cadastral domain model. In: Proceedings of XXIII FIG Congress Shaping the Change, Munich, Germany (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. van Oosterom, P., et al.: The core cadastral domain model. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 30, 627–660 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. ISO: 19152 - Geographic information - Land Administration Domain Model (2012). http://www.iso.org

  17. Lemmen, C., van Oosterom, P., Bennett, R.: The land administration domain model. Land Use Policy 49, 535–545 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Christl, A., et al.: Standard open source software for the social tenure domain. In: Annual World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. GLTN: Social Tenure Domain Model - a pro poor land information tool (2014). http://stdm.gltn.net

  20. Williamson, I., Ting, L., Grant, D.: The evolving role of land administration in support of sustainable development. Aust. Surveyor 44, 126–135 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  21. van Lamsweerde, A.: Requirements Engineering - From System Goals to UML Models to Software Specifications. Wiley, Hoboken (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yu, E.S.K., Mylopoulos, J.: Enterprise modelling for business redesign: the I* framework. SIGGROUP Bull. 18, 59–63 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. ITU: Recommendation Z.151 (10/12), User Requirements Notation (URN) - Language Definition (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. van Lamsweerde, A., Letier, E.: Handling obstacles in goal-oriented requirements engineering. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 26, 978–1005 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Respect-IT: KAOS meta-model (2005). http://www.respect-it.com

  26. Touzani, M., Ponsard, C.: Towards modelling and analysis of spatial and temporal requirements. In: 24th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bédard, Y., Larrivée, S.: Modeling with pictogrammic languages. In: Shekar, S., Xiong, H. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Geographic Information Sciences, pp. 716–725. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35973-1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Respect-IT: The objectiver requirements engineering tool (2005). http://www.respect-it.com

  29. Enemark, S.: Land administration infrastructures for sustainable development. Property Manag. 19, 366–383 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zevenbergen, J.: A systems approach to land registration and cadastre. Nordic J. Surv. Real Estate Res. 1(1), 1–10 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bogaerts, T., Zevenbergen, J.: Cadastral systems - alternatives. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 25, 325–337 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Vries, W.T.D., Wouters, R., Laarakker, P.M.: Land registration and cadastre, one or two agencies? In: Annual World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty, 14–18 March, Washington D.C. (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Fetai, B.: Analysing the effects of merging land registration and cadastre. University of Twente Faculty of Geo-Information and Earth Observation (ITC) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  34. UNESCAP: What is good governance? (2009). http://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/good-governance.pdf

  35. OMG: UML - Unified Modelling Language - Version 2.5 (2015). http://www.omg.org/spec/UML

  36. Tuladhar, A.M.: Why is unified modeling language (UML) for cadastral systems? M.Sc. University of Twente (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sladic, D., Radulovic, A., Govedarica, M., Jovanovic, D., Przulj, D.: The use of ontologies in cadastral systems. Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst. 12, 1033–1053 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Arp, R., Smith, B., Spear, A.D.: Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2015)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  39. Bittner, T., Donnelly, M., Smith, B.: A spatio-temporal ontology for geographic information integration. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 23, 765–798 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Jensen, M.: Sustainable development goals interface ontology. In: International Conference on Biomedical Ontology and BioCreative (ICBO BioCreative 2016) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Dechesne, B., Delannay, G., Massonet, P.: Agora project: requirements analyse for the creation of an unified cadastral database (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  42. EU PCC: Cadastral Information System, a Resource for the E.U. Policies. Overview of the Cadastral Systems of the E.U. Member States - Part I-II-III (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christophe Ponsard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ponsard, C., Touzani, M. (2019). Goal-Oriented Analysis and Design of Land Administration Systems. In: Ragia, L., Laurini, R., Rocha, J. (eds) Geographical Information Systems Theory, Applications and Management. GISTAM 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 936. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06010-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06010-7_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-06009-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-06010-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics