Literacy Acquisition in the Malayalam Orthography: Cognitive/Linguistic Influences within a Multilingual Context

  • Mimisha NesanEmail author
  • Amir Sadeghi
  • John Everatt
Part of the Literacy Studies book series (LITS, volume 17)


Reading comprehension is a complex process that stems from the development of decoding and understanding the written form of a language. Reading development largely depends on the typological and orthographical features of a language. Hence, research investigating the impact of different writing systems on reading processes and acquisition is needed to inform reading models and teaching practices across language/learning contexts. Malayalam is a prominent Indic language, but has hardly been studied in reading research. Therefore, to stimulate such research, the present chapter explains the orthographical features of Malayalam, considering these in terms of cross-linguistic factors that are important for reading acquisition. The chapter then presents a review of the relevant studies in reading, focusing on akshara orthographies and those recognising metalinguistic awareness as an aspect of successful reading acquisition, particularly in multilingual contexts. The chapter ends by arguing that phoneme-based instructional strategies should be usefully applied to Malayalam, despite its akshara characteristics.


Akshara versus alphabet Literacy acquisition Malayalam language Malayalam orthography Meta-linguistic awareness Multilingualism Predictors of reading 


  1. Abdelhadi, S., Ibrahim, R., & Eviatar, Z. (2011). Perceptual load in the reading of Arabic: Effects of orthographic visual complexity on detection. Writing Systems Research, 3(2), 117–127. Scholar
  2. Acha, J., Laka, I., & Perea, M. (2010). Reading development in agglutinative languages: Evidence from beginning, intermediate, and adult Basque readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105(4), 359–375. Scholar
  3. Acha, J., & Perea, M. (2008). The effects of length and transposed-letter similarity in lexical decision: Evidence with beginning, intermediate, and adult readers. British Journal of Psychology, 99(2), 245–264. Scholar
  4. Arduino, L. S., & Burani, C. (2004). Neighborhood effects on nonword visual processing in a language with shallow orthography. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 33(1), 75–95. Scholar
  5. Bhide, A., Gadgil, S., Zelinsky, C. M., & Perfetti, C. (2014). Does reading in an alphasyllabary affect phonemic awareness? Inherent schwa effects in Marathi-English bilinguals. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 73–93. Scholar
  6. Bialystok, E., McBride-Chang, C., & Luk, G. (2005). Bilingualism, language proficiency, and learning to read in two writing systems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(4), 580–590. Scholar
  7. Bijeljac-Babic, R., Millogo, V., Farioli, F., & Grainger, J. (2004). A developmental investigation of word length effects in reading using a new on-line word identification paradigm. Reading and Writing, 17(4), 411–431. Scholar
  8. Bowey, J. A., & Muller, D. (2005). Phonological recoding and rapid orthographic learning in third-graders’ silent reading: A critical test of the self-teaching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92(3), 203–219. Scholar
  9. Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read—A causal connection. Nature, 301(5899), 419–421. Scholar
  10. Caldwell, R. (1875). A comparative grammar of the Dravidian or south-Indian family of languages (2nd ed.). London, UK: Trübner and Co.Google Scholar
  11. Carlisle, J. F., Beeman, M., Davis, L. H., & Spharim, G. (1999). Relationship of metalinguistic capabilities and reading achievement for children who are becoming bilingual. Applied PsychoLinguistics, 20(04), 459–478. Scholar
  12. Chiappe, P., & Siegel, L. S. (1999). Phonological awareness and reading acquisition in English- and Punjabi-speaking Canadian children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 20–28. Scholar
  13. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108(1), 204–256. Scholar
  14. Duncan, L. G., Seymour, P. H., & Hill, S. (1997). How important are rhyme and analogy in beginning reading? Cognition, 63(2), 171–208. Scholar
  15. Francis, D. J., Shaywitz, S. E., Stuebing, K. K., Shaywitz, B. A., & Fletcher, J. M. (1996). Developmental lag versus deficit models of reading disability: A longitudinal, individual growth curves analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 3–17. Scholar
  16. Gafoor, A. (2011). Elementary competencies in 3R’s among upper primary pupils of Kerala: A secondary analysis. Innovations and Researches in Education, 1(1), 51–68.Google Scholar
  17. Gafoor, A. (2014). Tests screening reading difficulty in Malayalam among upper primary school boys. Guru Journal of Behavioral and Social Sciences, 2(1), 271–282.Google Scholar
  18. Gafoor, A., & Kaleeludeen, C. (2008). Reading difficulties among upper primary school pupils in Kerala. Journal of Studies in Teacher Education, 2(1), 22–34.Google Scholar
  19. Gafoor, A., & Remia, K. R. (2013). Influence of phonological awareness, morphological awareness and non-verbal ability on reading comprehension in Malayalam. Guru Journal of Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1(3), 128–138.Google Scholar
  20. Gopinathan, V. P. (1980). Diglossic sistuation in Malayalam. In A. K. Karunakaran & S. Agesthialingom (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and dialectology. Annamalainagar, India: Annamalai University.Google Scholar
  21. Goswami, U. (2010). A psycholinguistic grain size view of reading acquisition across languages. In N. Brunswick, S. McDougall, & P. de Mornay Davies (Eds.), Reading and dyslexia in different orthographies (pp. 23–42). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  22. Gough, P. B., Hoover, W. A., & Peterson, C. L. (1996). Some observations on a simple view of reading. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention (pp. 1–13). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. Scholar
  24. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103(3), 518–565. Scholar
  25. Gupta, A. (2004). Reading difficulties of Hindi-speaking children with developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 17(1/2), 79–99. Scholar
  26. Hammill, D. D. (2004). What we know about correlates of reading. Exceptional Children, 70(4), 453–469. Scholar
  27. Herdina, P., & Jessner, U. (2002). A dynamic model of multilingualism: perspectives of change in psycholinguistics. Clevedon, UK/Buffalo, NY: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2(2), 127–160. Scholar
  29. Jiang, H. (2010). Malayalam: A grammatical sketch and a text. Last retrieved October 2017 from
  30. Kumari, S. (1972). Malayalam phonetic reader. Mysore, India: Central Institute of Indian Languages.Google Scholar
  31. LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 293–323. Scholar
  32. McBride-Chang, C., Zhou, Y., Cho, J., Aram, D., Levin, I., & Tolchinsky, L. (2011). Visual spatial skill: A consequence of learning to read? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109(2), 256–262. Scholar
  33. Ministry of Home Affairs, G. o. I. (n.d.). The census of India 2011. Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India. Last retrieved August 2017 from
  34. Mohanan, K. P. (1986). The theory of lexical phonology. Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel Pub. Co.Google Scholar
  35. Nag, S. (2007). Early reading in Kannada: The pace of acquisition of orthographic knowledge and phonemic awareness. Journal of Research in Reading, 30(1), 7–22. Scholar
  36. Nag, S. (2013). Akshara-phonology mappings: The common yet uncommon case of the consonant cluster. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 105–119. Scholar
  37. Nag, S., Snowling, M., Quinlan, P., & Hulme, C. (2014). Child and symbol factors in learning to read a visually complex writing system. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(5), 309–324. Scholar
  38. Nag, S., & Snowling, M. J. (2010). Cognitive profiles of poor readers of Kannada. Reading and Writing, 24(6), 657–676. Scholar
  39. Nagy, W. E., & Anderson, R. C. (1995). Metalinguistic awareness and literacy acquisition in different languages. Technical Report No. 618. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading. Last retrieved October 2017 from
  40. Nakamura, P. R., Koda, K., & Joshi, R. M. (2013). Biliteracy acquisition in Kannada and English: A developmental study. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 132–147. Scholar
  41. Patel, P., & Soper, H. V. (1987). Acquisition of reading and spelling in a syllabo-alphabetic writing system. Language and Speech, 30(1), 69–81. Scholar
  42. Pelli, D. G., Burns, C. W., Farell, B., & Moore-Page, D. C. (2006). Feature detection and letter identification. Vision Research, 46(28), 4646–4674. Scholar
  43. Prema, S. (2016). Is Malayalam a diglossic language? Draft of paper presented at the 44th international conference of Dravidian linguists, Centre for Applied Linguistics & Translation Studies, Central University of Hydrabad, India, 16–18 June 2016. Last retrieved October 2017 from
  44. Ramachandran, P. (1971). Malayalam script-adoption of new script for use-orders issued (G. O. (P) 37/71/Edn). Trivandrum: Government of Kerala. Last retrieved October 2017 from
  45. Rao, C., Vaid, J., Srinivasan, N., & Chen, H. (2010). Orthographic characteristics speed Hindi word naming but slow Urdu naming: Evidence from Hindi/Urdu biliterates. Reading and Writing, 24(6), 679–695. Scholar
  46. Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2(2), 31–74. Scholar
  47. Reddy, P. P., & Koda, K. (2013). Orthographic constraints on phonological awareness in biliteracy development. Writing Systems Research, 5(1), 110–130. Scholar
  48. Sadanandan, S. (1999). Malayalam phonology – an optimality theoritic approach (Doctoral dissertation, Linguistics University of Southern California, Los Angeles, US). Last retrieved October 2017 from
  49. Scarborough, H. S. (1998). Early identification of children at risk for reading disabilities: Phonological awareness and some other promising predictors. In B. K. Shapiro, P. J. Accardo, & A. J. Capute (Eds.), Specific reading disability: A view of the spectrum (pp. 75–119). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
  50. Schadler, M., & Thissen, D. M. (1981). The development of automatic word recognition and reading skill. Memory & Cognition, 9(2), 132–141. Scholar
  51. Seymour, P. H. (2005). Early reading development in European orthographies. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 296–315). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. Scholar
  52. Share, D. L. (2008). On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. Scholar
  53. Share, D. L., Jorm, A. F., Maclean, R., & Matthews, R. (1984). Sources of individual differences in reading acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(6), 1309–1324. Scholar
  54. Siok, W. T., & Fletcher, P. (2001). The role of phonological awareness and visual-orthographic skills in Chinese reading acquisition. Developmental Psychology, 37(6), 886–899. Scholar
  55. Somashekara, H. S., Das, A., & Jayashree, S. B. (2014). Relationship between phonological awareness and reading abilities in Malayalam speaking typically developing children. Language in India, 14(2), 200–223. Last retrieved October 2017 from Scholar
  56. Su, Y., & Samuels, S. J. (2009). Developmental changes in character-complexity and word-length effects when reading Chinese script. Reading and Writing, 23(9), 1085–1108. Scholar
  57. Tiwari, S. (2011). Literacy development in the alphasyllabaries – implications for clinical practice. Rapporteur’s theme summary, language and literacy Cognititve development symposium, Bangalore. Last retrieved October 2017 from
  58. Tiwari, S., Nair, R., & Krishnan, G. (2011). A preliminary investigation of akshara knowledge in the Malayalam alphasyllabary: Extension of Nag’s (2007) study. Writing Systems Research, 3(2), 145–151. Scholar
  59. Wijayathilake, M. A., & Parrila, R. (2013). Predictors of word reading skills in good and struggling readers in Sinhala. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 120–131. Scholar
  60. Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 3–29. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Teacher Education, College of Education, Health and Human DevelopmentUniversity of CanterburyChristchurchNew Zealand
  2. 2.Department of English Language TeachingIslamic Azad UniversityDamavandIran

Personalised recommendations