Abstract
Surgical professional societies constitute a diverse group of organizations whose primary purposes are generally a combination of education and advocacy—advocacy for both the profession and for patients. Such organizations also reflect the ethical norms and values of their members which they may publish through policies and written codes of conduct. The purpose of this chapter is to examine how professional surgical societies address various ethical issues—whether it be at the policy level, the internal self-governance of the organization, discipline and supervision of the professional behavior of its members, or the educational level. This chapter will also address the issue of managing conflicts between the ethical perspectives of different professional societies—whether an individual member has to choose between the ethical obligations espoused by multiple organizations or whether there can be a middle ground.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Beauchamps TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013. p. 3.
Beauchamps TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013. p. 13.
Fox R. Is medical education asking too much of bioethics? Daedalus. 1999;128(4):1–25.
Rothman DJ, McDonald WJ, Berkowitz CD, et al. Professional medical associations and their relationships with industry: a proposal for controlling conflict of interest. JAMA. 2009;301(13):1367–72. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.407.
https://www.spine.org/WhoWeAre/LeadershipGovernance/AboutUs.
http://aats.org/aatsimis/AATS/Association/By-Laws_and_Policies/By-Laws/THE_BY-LAWS.aspx.
Pellegrino ED, Relman AS. Professional medical associations ethical and practical guidelines. JAMA. 1999;282(10):984–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.10.984.
Rothman DJ. Medical professionalism — focusing on the real issues. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1284–6.
Minkoff H, Ecker J. When guild interests and professional obligations collide. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(2):454–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002138.
Svider PF, Eloy JA, Baredes S, Setzen M, Folbe AJ. Expert witness testimony guidelines: identifying areas for improvement. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;152(2):207–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599814556721. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
Vogelstein E. Professional hubris and its consequences: why organizations of health-care professions should not adopt ethically controversial positions. Bioethics. 2016;30(4):234–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12186. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
Ferreres AR, Angelos P, Singer EA, editors. Ethical issues in surgical care. Chicago: American College of Surgeons; 2017.
https://www.sts.org/about-sts/policies/statement-physician-acting-expert-witness.
https://www.surgeons.org/about/governance-committees/committees/ethics-committee/.
Rouprêt M, Morgan TM, Bostrom PJ, et al. European Association of Urology recommendations on the appropriate use of social media. Eur Urol. 2014;66(4):628–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.046. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Whyte, R.I. (2019). Surgical Ethics and the Surgical Societies: What Are We Doing?. In: Ferreres, A. (eds) Surgical Ethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05964-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05964-4_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05963-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05964-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)