Skip to main content

Surgical Ethics and the Surgical Societies: What Are We Doing?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Surgical Ethics

Abstract

Surgical professional societies constitute a diverse group of organizations whose primary purposes are generally a combination of education and advocacy—advocacy for both the profession and for patients. Such organizations also reflect the ethical norms and values of their members which they may publish through policies and written codes of conduct. The purpose of this chapter is to examine how professional surgical societies address various ethical issues—whether it be at the policy level, the internal self-governance of the organization, discipline and supervision of the professional behavior of its members, or the educational level. This chapter will also address the issue of managing conflicts between the ethical perspectives of different professional societies—whether an individual member has to choose between the ethical obligations espoused by multiple organizations or whether there can be a middle ground.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Beauchamps TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013. p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beauchamps TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013. p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fox R. Is medical education asking too much of bioethics? Daedalus. 1999;128(4):1–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rothman DJ, McDonald WJ, Berkowitz CD, et al. Professional medical associations and their relationships with industry: a proposal for controlling conflict of interest. JAMA. 2009;301(13):1367–72. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.407.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. https://www.facs.org/about-acs.

  6. https://www.sts.org/about-sts.

  7. https://www.spine.org/WhoWeAre/LeadershipGovernance/AboutUs.

  8. http://aats.org/aatsimis/AATS/Association/By-Laws_and_Policies/By-Laws/THE_BY-LAWS.aspx.

  9. Pellegrino ED, Relman AS. Professional medical associations ethical and practical guidelines. JAMA. 1999;282(10):984–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.10.984.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rothman DJ. Medical professionalism — focusing on the real issues. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1284–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Minkoff H, Ecker J. When guild interests and professional obligations collide. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(2):454–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. https://www.surgeons.org/news/racs-apologises/.

  13. Svider PF, Eloy JA, Baredes S, Setzen M, Folbe AJ. Expert witness testimony guidelines: identifying areas for improvement. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;152(2):207–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599814556721. Epub 2014 Nov 11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vogelstein E. Professional hubris and its consequences: why organizations of health-care professions should not adopt ethically controversial positions. Bioethics. 2016;30(4):234–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12186. Epub 2015 Aug 26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferreres AR, Angelos P, Singer EA, editors. Ethical issues in surgical care. Chicago: American College of Surgeons; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  16. https://www.facs.org/about-acs/statements/stonprin.

  17. https://www.sts.org/about-sts/governance-and-leadership/committees-council-operating-boards-workforces.

  18. https://www.sts.org/about-sts/policies/cardiothoracic-surgical-organizations-standards-interactions-companies-0.

  19. https://www.sts.org/about-sts/policies/statement-physician-acting-expert-witness.

  20. http://www.eapsa.org/about-apsa/committees/?cid=ETHICS.

  21. https://www.surgeons.org/about/governance-committees/committees/ethics-committee/.

  22. Rouprêt M, Morgan TM, Bostrom PJ, et al. European Association of Urology recommendations on the appropriate use of social media. Eur Urol. 2014;66(4):628–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.046. Epub 2014 Jul 16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. https://www.facs.org/about-acs/statements/106-social-media.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard I. Whyte .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Whyte, R.I. (2019). Surgical Ethics and the Surgical Societies: What Are We Doing?. In: Ferreres, A. (eds) Surgical Ethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05964-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05964-4_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05963-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05964-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics