Skip to main content

Ethical Issues in Cardiothoracic Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Surgical Ethics
  • 774 Accesses

Abstract

The field of cardiothoracic surgery shares many moral principles and related ethical challenges with other branches of surgery but must deal with them in contexts unique to the specialty. Ethical issues that are currently under active discussion and debate in the cardiothoracic surgical community include professionalism; the need to balance the multiple professional responsibilities such as duty to patient, duty to employer, and duties to trainees; the use, and potential misuse, of national quality databases; the oversight of innovation; and futile, end-of-life, and withdrawal of care. Such issues will be reviewed in the context of both duty-based and consequentialist ethical frameworks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pellegrino ED, Relman AS. Professional medical associations: ethical and practical guidelines. JAMA. 1999;282(10):984–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.10.984.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013. p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ferreres AR, Angelos P, Singer EA, editors. Ethical issues in surgical care. Chicago: American College of Surgeons; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sade RM, editor. The ethics of surgery. New York: Oxford University Press; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wicclair MR, White DB. Surgeons, intensivists, and discretion to refuse requested treatments. Hast Cent Rep. 2014;44(5):33–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chaet DH. The AMA Code of Medical Ethics’ opinions on patient decision-making capacity and competence and surrogate decision making. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(6):601–3. https://doi.org/10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.6.coet1-1606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Meisel A, Snyder L, Quill T. Seven legal barriers to end-of-life care: myths, realities, and grains of truth. JAMA. 2000;284(19):2495–501.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Brock D. Chapter 9: Utilitarianism. In: Regan T, VanDeVeer D, editors. And justice for all: new introductory essays in ethics & public policy. Totowa: Rowman and Littlefield; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Beauchamps TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013. p. 226.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eusanio M, Patel HJ, Nienaber CA, et al. Patients with type a acute aortic dissection presenting with major brain injury: should we operate on them? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145(3 Suppl):S213–21.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.11.054.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. DiMaio JM, Salerno TA, Bernstein R, Araujo K, Ricci M, Sade RM. Ethical obligation of surgeons to noncompliant patients: can a surgeon refuse to operate on an intravenous drug-abusing patient with recurrent aortic valve prosthesis infection? Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/acs-nsqip.

  13. https://www.sts.org/registries-research-center/sts-national-database/sts-adult-cardiac-surgery-database.

  14. Chassin MR, Hannan EL, DeBuono BA. Benefits and hazards of reporting medical outcomes publicly. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(6):394–8. PMID 8538714.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jacobs JP, Shahian DM, Prager RL, et al. The society of thoracic surgeons national database 2016 annual report. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102(6):1790–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.10.015. PMID: 27847042.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cornwell LD, Omer S, Rosengart T, et al. Changes over time in risk profiles of patients who undergo coronary artery bypass graft surgery: the veterans affairs surgical quality improvement program (VASQIP). JAMA Surg. 2015;150(4):308–15. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Seder CW, Wright CD, Chang AC, Han JM, McDonald D, Kozower BD. The society of thoracic surgeons general thoracic surgery database update on outcomes and quality. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101(5):1646–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.02.099. Epub 2016 Mar 31. PMID: 27041451.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McKneally MF, Martin DK. An entrustment model of consent for surgical treatment of life-threatening illness: perspective of patients requiring esophagectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;120(2):264–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Abrams DC, Prager K, Blinderman CD, Burkart KM, Brodie D. Ethical dilemmas encountered with the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adults. Chest. 2014;145(4):876–82. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.13-1138. PMID: 24687709.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Makdisi T, Makdisi G. Extra corporeal membrane oxygenation support: ethical dilemmas. Ann Transl Med. 2017;5(5):112. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2017.01.38. PMID: 28361077.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Courtwright AM, Robinson EM, Feins K, Carr-Loveland J, Donahue V, Roy N, McCannon J. Ethics Committee Consultation and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13(9):1553–8. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201511-757OC. PMID: 27299991.

  22. Ohye RG, Jaggers JJ, Sade RM. Must surgeons in training programs allow residents to operate on their patients to satisfy board requirements? Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101(1):18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.08.049.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kent M, Whyte R, Fleishman A, Tomich D, Forrow L, Rodrigue J. Public perceptions of overlapping surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;224(5):771–778.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.01.059. Epub 2017 Feb 11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fenton K, Ellis J, Sade RM. Should a thoracic surgeon transfer a complicated case to a competing medical center against the hospital’s order? Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100(2):389–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.04.053.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Freidson E. Chapter 12: Nourishing professionalism. In: Professionalism reborn: theory, prophecy, and policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Aviv R. What does it mean to die? New Yorker Magazine. 2018, February 5, Issue. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/02/05/what-does-it-mean-to-die.

  27. Brody H. Physician-assisted suicide in the courts: moral equivalence, double effect, and clinical practice. Minn Law Rev. 1998;82:939–1695.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard I. Whyte .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Whyte, R.I., Wood, D.E. (2019). Ethical Issues in Cardiothoracic Surgery. In: Ferreres, A. (eds) Surgical Ethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05964-4_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05964-4_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05963-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05964-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics