Abstract
Organ transplantation is a recognized practice since more than 30 years ago, and the largest problem it faces is the shortage of donors. This is a world phenomenon that the society at large has not yet been able to solve, which added to the accessibility and integral support of the transplanted patient represent a source of ethical conflicts. In the particular case of pediatric liver transplantation, this situation already starts with a significant numerical inferiority in the waiting list in comparison to adults. Different strategies have been devised in favor of equity such as pediatric donors for pediatric recipients, pediatric end-stage liver disease (PELD) score × 3 (the actual PELD score multiplied by 3 to be competitive on the waiting list with adults), split liver techniques, and the living donor (LD) approach, but none of these measures have shown conclusive improved results in relation to the magnitude of the waiting list times.
Two ethical assessments derive from the above mentioned situations: the first one, related to LD and the careful evaluation that it imposes since it represents a surgical intervention in a healthy individual, with potential harmful physical and psychological consequences and, secondly, equity in the distribution process with a need for a very rigorous analysis between the most compromised patient and the one with the best chance of survival, since there are two positions that at first may look as antinomic.
Pediatric liver transplantation is a high-cost practice and requires lifelong medication and follow-up. In many low resource countries, the issue of lifelong postoperative follow-up is very important, with the risk of graft malfunction with impact on quality of life, survival, and death.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to examine the definition of brain death. A definition of irreversible coma. JAMA. 1968;205:337–401. Eric J. Keller, Paul Y.
Keller EJ, Kwo PY, Helft PR. Ethical considerations surrounding survival benefit–based liver allocation. Liver Transpl. 2014;20:140–6.
Wells WJ, Barr ML. The ethics of living donor lung transplantation. Thorac Surg Clin. 2005;15(4):519–25.
Mendoza Sánchez F, Sereno Trabaldo S, Montemayor Cantú G, et al. Trasplante intestinal de donador vivo relacionado: Primer reporte en Latinoamérica. Rev Invest Clin. 2011;63(Suppl 1):96–100.
Welman T, Villani V, Shanmugarajah K, et al. From kidney transplants to vascularized composite allografts: the role of the plastic surgeon in transplantation vascularized composite. Allotransplantation. 2015;2(4)
Borel JF, Kis ZL. The discovery and development of cyclosporine (Sandimmune). Transplant Proc. 1991;23:1867–74.
Matesanz R (Editor). El modelo español de coordinación y transplantes. 2ª Edición. 2008. GRUPO Aula Médica, Madrid, 2008.
Starzl TE, Putnam CW, editors. Experience in hepatic transplantation. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1969. p. 131–5.
Liver Transplantation. NIH Consensus Statement. 1983;4(7):1–15. US Department of Health and Human Services. Hepatology. 1984;4(1 Suppl):107s–110s.
Singer PA, Siegler M, Whintington PF, et al. Ethics of Liver transplantation with living donors. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:620–2.
Organizació Catalana de Trasplantaments, Servei Catalá de la Salut, Societat Catalana de Transplantament. Etica de la donación en vivo (Editorial). Butlleti Trasplantaments. 2007;36:1.
Chugh KS, Jha V. Treatment modality options: Problems and outcomes of living unrelated donor transplants in the developing countries. Kidney Int. 2000;57:S131–5.
Robertson CM, Dinu IA, Joffe AR, et al. Neurocognitive outcomes at kindergarten entry after liver transplantation at 3yr of age. Pediatr Transplant. 2013;17:621–30.
Schaubel DE, Guidinger MK, Biggins SW, et al. Survival benefit based deceased-donor liver allocation. Am J Transplant. 2009;9:970–81.
www.who.int/about/mission/en/. Accessed 17 Mar 2018.
Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1989.
Suggested Bibliography
Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 1979.
Brown H. La nueva filosofía de la ciencia. Madrid: Tecnos; 1983.
Popper K. La lógica de la investigación científica. 13° ed. Madrid: Tecnos.
Sgreccia E. Manual de Bioética, vol. I. Madrid, BAC; 2009.
Valapour D. Living donor transplantation: the perfect balance of public oversight and medical responsibility. J Clin Ethics. 2007 Spring;18(1):18–23.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cesar, I.O., Daniel, R.L. (2019). Ethical Issues in Pediatric Liver Transplantation. In: Ferreres, A. (eds) Surgical Ethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05964-4_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05964-4_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05963-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05964-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)