Abstract
The origin of surgical ethics has been ambiguous. Some claim it dates back to the ancient Greeks, but most believe it began at least in part with Gregory and Percival who are credited as the founders of modern medical ethics. Although medical and surgical ethics share common fundamental principles, surgical ethics evolved distinctly from medical ethics due to the unique nature of surgery and the surgeon-patient relationship. The history of surgery as a profession has revolved around ethical issues unique to surgery such as fee splitting, itinerant surgery, informed consent, solid organ transplantation, and surgical innovation. As the field of surgery continues to advance, society will rely on surgeons to guide the future of surgical ethics to ensure that trust is upheld and the focus remains on the patient.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Jonsen A. A short history of medical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000.
Mininberg D. In: Allen JP, editor. The legacy of ancient Egyptian medicine. The art of medicine in ancient Egypt. New York: Metropolitan Museum Press; 2005. p. 13–5.
Namm JP, Siegler M, Brander C, Kim TY, Lowe C, Angelos P. History and evolution of surgical ethics: John Gregory to the twenty-first century. World J Surg. 2014;38(7):1568–73.
McCullough L. The nature and limits of the Physician’s professional responsibilities: surgical ethics, matters of conscience, and managed care. Medicine and Philosophy. 2004;29(1):3–9.
Jones JW, MacCullough LB, Richman BW. The ethics of surgical practice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2008.
Beauchamp T, Faden RR. History of informed consent Reich WT encyclopedia of bioethics ed. New York, NY: Free Press; 1978. p. 1233.
McCullough L. John Gregory and the invention of professional medical ethics and the profession of medicine. Dordrect: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1998.
Bastron D, McCullough L. What goes around, comes around: John Gregory, MD, and the profession of medicine. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2007;20:18–21.
Percival T. Medical ethics. New York, NY: Leslie B Adams; 1985.
Thomas Percival (1740--1804). Codifier of Medical Ethics. JAMA. 1965;194(12):1319–20.
Inglis-Arkell E. The legend of the surgery with the 300% mortality rate: Science Direct; 2015 [cited 2017]. Available from: https://io9.gizmodo.com/the-legend-of-the-surgery-with-the-300-mortality-rate-1684894531.
Imber G. Genius on the edge. New York, NY: Kaplan Publishing; 2011.
Rise G. Modern surgery in hospitals: development of anesthesia and antisepsis. Mending bodies, saving souls a history of hospitals. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1888. p. 339–98.
Davis L. Fellowship of surgeons: a history of the American College of Surgeons. Chicago, Ill: American College of Surgeons; 1960.
Rosenberg C. The Care of Strangers: the Rise of America’s hospital system. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 1987.
Risse G. Mending Bodies, Saving souls: a history of hospitals. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999.
Angelos P. The right choice? Surgical ethics and the history of surgery. [cited 2017 11/8]. Available from: http://www.mdedge.com/acssurgerynews/article/141648/practice-management/right-choice-surgical-ethics-and-history-surgery.
Jones J, McCullough L, Richman B. Informed consent: it’s not just signing a form. Thorac Surg Clin. 2005;15(4):451–60.. v
McKneally M, Martin D. An entrustment model of consent for surgical treatment of life-threatening illness: perspective of patients requiring esophagectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;120(2):264–9.
Namm J, Siegler M, Angelos P. What is distinctive about surgical ethics. In: Ferreres A, Angelos P, Singer A, editors. Ethical issues in Surgical Care. Chicago: American College of Surgeons; 2017.
Schloendorff V. Society of New York Hospital. 105 NE 92. New York; 1914.
Beauchamp T, Childress J. Principles of biomedical ethics. 7th ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2013.
Brunicardi F, Anderson DK, Billiar TR, et al. Schwartz’s principles of surgery. 10th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education; 2015.
Moore F, et al. Surgical ethics and the dying patient. Bull Am Coll Surg. 1975;60(6):12–6.
Barclay WR. Guidelines for the Determination of Death. JAMA. 1981;246(19):2194.
Keely G, Gorsuch AM, McCabe JM, et al. Uniform determination of death act. Chicago, IL: National Conference of Commissioners On Uniform State Laws; 1980.
Davis C, Delmonico F. Living-donor kidney transplantation: a review of the current practices for the live donor. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16(7):2098–110.
Singer P, Sigler M, Whitington P. Ethics of liver transplantation with living donors. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:620–2.
Kim P, Testa G. Living donor liver transplantation in the USA. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2016;5(2):133–40.
Nadalin S, Bockhorn M, Malago M, et al. Living donor liver transplantation. HPB (Oxford). 2006;8(1):10–21.
Michael L. Evidence-based medicine, cost containment, care effectiveness: Is it a new trilogy aimed at transforming the surgical mystique or the reality of double standards? Acta Chir Belg. 2001;101:95–100.
Reitsman A, Moreno JD. Ethical regulations for innovative surgery: the last frontier. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;194:792–801.
AM R, MJ D. Ethical regulations for innovative surgery: the last frontier? J Am Coll Surg. 2002;194(6):792–801.
Reynolds W. The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Profiles in Laparoscopy. 2001;5(1):89–94.
Bernard H, Hartman TW. Complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1993;165:533–5.
The Southern Surgeons Club MM, Bennett C. The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1992;170(1):55–9.
Jones J, McCullough L, Richman B. The ethics of innovative surgical approaches for well-established procedures. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40(1):199–201.
McKneally M, Daar A. Introducing new technologies: protecting subjects of surgical innovation and research. World J Surg. 2003;27(8):930–4.. discussion 4-5
Biffl W, Spain D, Reitsma A, et al. Responsible development and application of surgical innovations: a position statement of the Society of University Surgeons. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206(6):1204–9.
Angelos P. Orlo Clark and the rise of surgical ethics. World J Surg. 2009;33(3):372–4.
Little M. The fivefold root of an ethics of surgery. Bioethics. 2002;16(3):183–201.
Angelos P. Surgical ethics and the challenge of surgical innovation. Am J Surg. 2014;208(6):881–5.
Bosk C. Forgive and remember. 2nd ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 2003.
Suggested Literature
Angelos P. Orlo Clark and the risk of surgical ethics. 2009; 50(3): 99–134.
Litle M. The fivefold root of surgical ethics. 2002; 16(3): 183–201.
Nahrwold DL, Kernahan PJ. A century of surgeons and surgery: the American College of Surgeons 1913–2012. Chicago: American College of Surgeons; 2012.
Namm, et al. History and evolution of surgical ethics: from John Gregory to the 21st century. World J Surg. 2014;38(7):1568–73.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Glossary
- Nonmaleficence
-
A fundamental principle of bioethics meaning first do no harm. It is based from the writings of Hippocrates primum non nocere.
- Fee splitting
-
The practice of splitting the price the patient paid for surgery. It incentivized both the referring physician and the surgeon. It was addressed when ACS was first established as an unethical practice.
- Itinerant surgery
-
A common practice in the early twentieth century when a surgeon would come at the request of a primary care physician and perform a surgery without ever seeing the patient first. Postoperative care was also left in the hands of the primary care physician. It was addressed as unethical practice, and surgeons were barred entrance into ACS fellowship if they were known to do this practice.
- Reasonable person standard
-
Referring to the disclosure that accompanies the informed consent discussion. The reasonable person is the accepted form of disclosure meaning that the information disclosed should be in line with a hypothetical reasonable person.
- Justice
-
One of the fundamental principles of bioethics. It is based on the idea fairness and equal treatment for all involved parties.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Namm, J.P., Krause, C.C. (2019). The History of Surgical Ethics. In: Ferreres, A. (eds) Surgical Ethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05964-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05964-4_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05963-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05964-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)