Informed consent is currently considered to be a highly important factor which is becoming a critical component of surgical practice. It is a complex process and not just an event or a single encounter. In the twenty-first century, it is accepted that the traditional paternalist relationship between the patient and physician has been replaced by a new type of relationship in which the patient detents a very active and crucial role. For patients who need a surgical procedure, the informed consent process represents the honing of this link between the surgeon and his or her patient. The legal principle emphasizes the fact that the patient is an independent adult who has the capacity to authorize what is going to be done to his or her body. This is a process with significant ethical and legal aspects where both the surgeon and the patient play a major role.
The components which make up the informed consent process are the preconditions, the information provided to the patient, and the consent itself. The most complex step of the informed consent process for the surgeon is providing correct, truthful, unbiased, and accurate information to the patient while keeping hope in him or her. The physician disclosure has three stages: the disclosure of information, the patient understanding, and the patient decision-making. It is necessary to adapt the information to each patient in a language they can always understand. The physician must provide information about the surgical procedure, the benefits, the associated risks, potential complications, and alternative procedures, if any.
Surgeons must use all the available tools to adequately inform the patient and the relatives and improve his or her understanding: information leaflets, multimedia interventions, decision aids, the Internet, and government and professional organization guidelines. New tools as surgical risk calculators which estimate patient-specific postoperative complications for different procedures are now available.
The ultimate goal of the informed consent process should be fostering the patient’s trust in his or her surgeon.
Surgical informed consent Physician disclosure Trust Shared decision-making Tools for improving information
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Grant SB, Modi PK, Singer EA. The surgical informed consent process. In: Ferreres AR, Angelos P, Singer EA, editors. Ethical issues in surgical care, vol. 2017. Chicago: American College of Surgeons Division of Education; 2017. p. 137–63.Google Scholar
Caínzos M, González-Vinagre S. Informed consent in surgery. World J Surg. 2014;38:1587–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board (Scotland), (2015); UKCS 11.Google Scholar
Ley 41/2002 de Noviembre, básica reguladora de la autonomía del paciente y de derechos y obligaciones en materia de información y documentación clínica. Boletín Oficial del Estado, 15 de Noviembre de 2002. Págs. 40126–32.Google Scholar
Childers R, Lipsett PA, Pawlik TM. Informed consent and the surgeon. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208:627–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acea B. Informed consent in the surgical patient. Reflections on the basic law of patient autonomy. Cir Esp. 2005;77:321–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leclercq WKG, Keulers BJ, Scheltinga MRM, et al. A review of surgical informed consent: past, present, and future. A quest to help patients make better decisions. World J Surg. 2010;34:1406–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Char SJL, Lo B, Kirkwood KS. How important is disclosing surgeon experience when obtaining informed consent? J Am CollSurg. 2011;213(3S):S112–3.Google Scholar
Heneghan K, Walter KR. Legislative activities and informed consent. Bulletin American College of Surgeons. 2016;101:61–5.Google Scholar
Skowron KB, Angelos P. Surgical informed consent revisited: time to revise the routine? World J Surg. 2017;41:1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angelos P. The evolution of informed consent for surgery using the best case/worst case framework. JAMA Surg. 2017;152:538–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruser JM, Nabozny MJ, Steffens NM, et al. “Best case/worst case”: qualitative evolution of a novel communication tool for difficult in-the-moment surgical decision. J Am Geriat Soc. 2015;63:1805–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor LJ, Nabozny MJ, Steffens NM, et al. A framework to improve surgeon communication in high-stakes surgical decisions: best case/worst case. JAMA Surg. 2017;152:531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keulers BJ, Scheltinga MRM, Houtermann S, et al. Surgeons underestimated their patients’ desire for preoperative information. World J Surg. 2008;32:964–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rastogi P. Through the looking glass – understanding informed consent. Clinical Ethics. 2015;10:41–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheer AS, O’Connor AM, Chan BPK, et al. The myth of informed consent in rectal cancer surgery: what do patients retain? Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:970–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon MJ, Pager CK, Keshava A, et al. What do patients want? Patient preferences and surrogate decision-making in the treatment of colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:1351–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masya LM, Young JM, Solomon MJ, et al. Preferences for outcomes of treatment for rectal cancer: patient and clinician utilities and their application in an interactive computer-based decision aid. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:1994–2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fink AS, Prochazka AV, Herderson WG, et al. Predictor of comprehension during surgical informed consent. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210:919–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruíz Lopez R. Informed consent in surgery. Distance between theory and practice. Cir Esp. 2013;91:551–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braddock C 3rd, Hudal PL, Feldmann JJ, et al. Surgery is certainly one good option: quality and time-efficiency of informed decision-making in surgery. J Bone Joint Am. 2008;90:1830–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulsow JJW, Feeley M, Tierney S. Review. Beyond consent – improving understanding in surgical patients. Am J Surg. 2012;203:112–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamhankar AP, Mazari F, Everitt NJ, Ravi K. Use of the internet by patients undergoing elective hernia repair or cholecystectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2009;91:460–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berland GK, Elliott MN, Morales LS, et al. Health information on the internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. JAMA. 2001;285:2612–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy JO, Sweeney KL, O’Mahony JC, et al. Surgical informatics in internet: any improvement? Surgeon. 2003;1:177–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy MA, Joyce WP. Information for surgical patients: implications of the world wide web. Eur J Surg. 2001;167:728–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans R, Elwyn G, Edwards A. Making interactive decision support for patients a reality. Inform Prim Care. 2004;12:109–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Department of Health. Good practice in consent implementation guide: consent to examination or treatment. London: Department of Health; 2001.Google Scholar
Atrey A, Leslie I, Carvell J, et al. Standardised consent forms on the website of the British Orthopaedic Association. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:422–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fink AS, Prochazka AV, Henderson WG, et al. Enhancement of surgical informed consent by addition of repeat back: a multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2010;252:27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American College of Surgeons. www.facs.org. Public information from the American College of Surgeons, 2013.
Bilimoria KY, Liu Y, Paruch JL, et al. Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217:833–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu Y, Cohen ME, Hall BI, et al. Evaluation and enhancement of calibration in the American College of Surgeons NSQIP surgical risk calculator. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;223:231–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen ME, Liu Y, Ko CY, Hall BL. An examination of American College of Surgeons NSQIP surgical risk calculator accuracy. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;224:787–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraemer K, Cohen ME, Liu Y, et al. Development and evaluation of the American College of Surgeons NSQIP pediatric surgical risk calculator. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;223:685–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubitz AL, Chan E, Zarif D, et al. American College of Surgeons NSQIP risk calculator accuracy for emergent and elective colorectal operations. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;225:601–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kole J, Fiester A. Incidental findings and the need for a revised informed consent process. AJR. 2013;201:1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario. Consent to treatment. Dialogue. 2015;11:50.Google Scholar
Purcaru D, Preda A, Popa D, et al. Informed consent: how much awareness is there? PLOS ONE. www.plosone.org. 2014;9:1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim EK, Kim S. Simplification improves understanding of informed consent information in clinical trials regardless of health literacy level. Clin Trials. 2015;12:232–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halloch JL, Rios R, Handa RL. Patient satisfaction and informed consent for surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217:181.e1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grady C, Cummings SR, Rowbotham MC, et al. Informed consent. N Engl J Med. 2017;369:856–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar