Advertisement

The Anesthesiologist and the Surgeon: Two Professionals Sharing the Command of the Patient in the Operating Room

  • Anthony M. RocheEmail author
  • Gerald Dubowitz
Chapter

Abstract

The operating room is a challenging and stressful environment and is one of the most complex medical environments. Multiple specialties intersect with each other as well as with nursing staff and technicians. Overlaid are immeasurable hospital processes and patient interactions, all culminating in safe surgeries for patients placing their trust in their physicians and the hospital. Leadership is required to align staff and processes, all with the abovementioned goal of providing each patient with a safe and successful surgical outcome. This chapter examines the multiple processes involved and covers many of the ethical considerations involved in, for example, patient encounters, leadership, conflict resolution, and team building. The chapter is also aimed at investigating the ethics of international health programs and how personal and programmatic ethical challenges can be problematic to both hosts and visitors in low-resource settings and how to set up processes which are aimed at preventing or solving such challenges.

Keywords

Ethics Professional Anesthesia Surgery Global health 

References

  1. 1.
    Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. The moral foundation of medical leadership: the professional virtues of the physician as fiduciary of the patient. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184(5):875–9; discussion 9–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Press OU. Human right. Oxford University Press; 2018 [Definition of Human Right]. Available from: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/human_right.
  3. 3.
    Nations U. Universal declaration of human rights. Geneva; 1948. Available from: http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/.
  4. 4.
    Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ferreres AR. Professionalism in the operating room. In: Jericho BG, editor. Ethical issues in anesthesiology and surgery. Heidelberg: Springer; 2015. p. 127–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Press OU. Justice. Oxford University Press; [Definition of Justice]. Available from: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/justice.
  7. 7.
    Kelly RJ, Nisynboim C. Fatigue and the care of patients. In: Jericho BG, editor. Ethical issues in anesthesiology and surgery. Heidelberg: Springer; 2015. p. 79–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Medicine AFABoI, Medicine A-AFACoP-ASoI, European Federation of Internal M. Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physician charter. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136(3):243–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Institute HE. Health equity. San Francisco: San Francisco State University; 2018. Available from: https://healthequity.sfsu.edu/content/defining-health-equity.
  10. 10.
    Party RCoPW. Doctors in society. Medical professionalism in a changing world. London; 2005.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Trust UHBN. Clinical Governance Edgbaston. Birmingham; 2018. Available from: www.uhb.nhs.uk/clinical-governance.htm.
  12. 12.
    Philippon DJ, Braithwaite J. Health system organization and governance in Canada and Australia: a comparison of historical developments, recent policy changes and future implications. Healthc Policy. 2008;4(1):e168–86.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Scholefield H. Clinical governance: what foundation doctors need to know. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2005;66(10):M42–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Spark JI, Rowe S. Clinical governance: its effect on surgery and the surgeon. ANZ J Surg. 2004;74(3):167–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Braithwaite J, Travaglia JF. An overview of clinical governance policies, practices and initiatives. Aust Health Rev. 2008;32(1):10–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Meara JG, Leather AJ, Hagander L, Alkire BC, Alonso N, Ameh EA, et al. Global surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Lancet. 2015;386(9993):569–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kotagal M, Horvath K. Surgical delivery in under-resourced settings: building systems and capacity around the corner and far away. JAMA Surg. 2015;150(2):100–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Holm JD, Malete L. Nine problems that hinder partnerships in Africa. Commentary. The Chronicle of Higher Education. 2010. 06/13/2010.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Deaton A. The great escape: health, wealth, and the origins of inequality. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Easterly W. The white man’s burden: why the west’s efforts to aid the rest have done so much ill and so little good. New York: Penguin Publishing Group; 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Moyo D, Ferguson N. Dead aid: why aid is not working and how there is a better way for Africa. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux; 2009.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sachs J. The end of poverty: economic possibilities for our time. New York: Penguin Books; 2006.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Research CCfGH. Partnership assessment tool: Canadian Coalition for Global Health Research; 2017. Available from: www.ccghr.ca/resources/partnerships-and-networking/partnership-assessment-tool/.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  2. 2.University of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations