Skip to main content

Citizen Engagement and Entrepreneurship: Implications for Sustainable Tourism Development

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 4390 Accesses

Abstract

Research has not investigated the use of competitions-hackathons as a citizen engagement tool to motivate and activate citizen’s engagement in entrepreneurship driving sustainable tourism development. This paper fills in this gap by using the SHARE Challenge as a case study. SHARE is a competition-based crowdsourcing project launched by the Government of South Australia aiming to engage citizens in sharing economy entrepreneurial ventures. The competition received 88 eligible ideas from different stakeholders, and the study conducted a content analyses of these ideas for investigating the profile of the citizens and the type of the sharing economy ideas that were inspired by the SHARE. Tourism was found to be the sector attracting most of the submitted ideas for starting-up a sharing economy entrepreneurial venture aiming to make sustainable use of tourism resources. The findings provide evidence on how SHARE has ‘educated’, inspired, and activated the citizens to engage in sustainable entrepreneurship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kraft ME, Clary BB (1991) Citizen participation and the NIMBY syndrome: public response to radioactive waste disposal. West Polit Q 44(2):299–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wagenet LP, Pfeffer MJ (2007) Organizing citizen engagement for democratic environmental planning. Soc Nat Resour 20(9):801–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carr DS, Halvorsen K (2001) An evaluation of three democratic, community-based approaches to citizen participation: surveys, conversations with community groups, and community dinners. Soc Nat Resour 14(2):107–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Radtke J (2014) A closer look inside collaborative action: civic engagement and participation in community energy initiatives. People Place Policy Online 8(3)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Leckart C (2012) The hackathon is on: pitching and programming the next killer app. https://www.wired.com/2012/02/ff_hackathons/. Accessed 29 Oct 2017

  6. Hartmann S, Mainka A, Stock WG (2016) Opportunities and challenges for civic engagement: a global investigation of innovation competitions. Int J Knowl Soc Res (IJKSR) 7(3):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hamari J, Sjöklint M, Ukkonen A (2016) The sharing economy: why people participate in collaborative consumption. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 67(9):2047–2059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wishnie J (2014) Why hackathons suck (and don’t have to). https://www.thoughtworks.com/insights/blog/why-hackathons-suck. Accessed 31 Oct 2014

  9. Briscoe G (2014) Digital innovation: the hackathon phenomenon

    Google Scholar 

  10. Desouza KC, Bhagwatwar A (2012) Citizen apps to solve complex urban problems. J Urban Technol 19(3):107–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Olphert W, Damodaran L (2007) Citizen participation and engagement in the design of e-government services: the missing link in effective ICT design and delivery. J Assoc Inf Syst 8(9):27

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lee CP, Chang K, Berry FS (2011) Testing the development and diffusion of e-government and e-democracy: a global perspective. Public Adm. Rev. 71(3):444–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Macintosh A (2008) E-democracy and e-participation research in Europe. In: Digital government. Springer, Boston, MA, pp 85–102

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Chun S, Shulman S, Sandoval R, Hovy E (2010) Government 2.0: making connections between citizens, data and government. Inf Polity 15(1, 2): 1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Linders D (2012) From e-government to we-government: defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Inf Q 29(4):446–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Alexis P (2017) Over-tourism and anti-tourist sentiment: an exploratory analysis and discussion. Ovidius Univ Ann Econ Sci Ser 17(2):288–293

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lee TH (2013) Influence analysis of community resident support for sustainable tourism development. Tour. Manag. 34:37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McIntyre G (1993) Sustainable tourism development: guide for local planners. World Tourism Organization, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  19. Liu Z (2003) Sustainable tourism development: a critique. J Sustain Tour 11(6):459–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Okazaki E (2008) A community-based tourism model: Its conception and use. J Sustain Tour 16(5):511–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Arnstein SR (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Planners 35(4):216–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Richard GT, Kafai YB, Adleberg B, Telhan O (2015) StitchFest: diversifying a college hackathon to broaden participation and perceptions in computing. In: Proceedings of the 46th ACM technical symposium on computer science education. ACM, pp 114–119

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hartmann S, Mainka A, Stock WG (2016) Opportunities and challenges for civic engagement: a global investigation of innovation competitions. Int J Knowl Soc Res (IJKSR) 7(3):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Stimson R, Baum S, Mullins P, O’Connor K (2001) Australia’s regional cities and towns: modelling community opportunity and vulnerability. Australas J Regional Stud 7(1):23.s

    Google Scholar 

  25. Burby R, Dixon J, Ericksen N, Handmer J, May P, Michaels S, Smith DI (2013) Environmental management and governance: intergovernmental approaches to hazards and sustainability. Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  26. Byrd ET (2007) Stakeholders in sustainable tourism development and their roles: applying stakeholder theory to sustainable tourism development. Tour Rev 62(2):6–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Koontz TM, Newig J (2014) From planning to implementation: top-down and bottom-up approaches for collaborative watershed management. Policy Stud J 42(3):416–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chok S, Macbeth J, Warren C (2007) Tourism as a tool for poverty alleviation: a critical analysis of ‘pro-poor tourism’ and implications for sustainability. Curr Issues Tour 10(2–3):144–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dandison Ukpabi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sigala, M., Ukpabi, D. (2019). Citizen Engagement and Entrepreneurship: Implications for Sustainable Tourism Development. In: Pesonen, J., Neidhardt, J. (eds) Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2019. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05940-8_31

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics