Skip to main content

Towards a Measurement Scale for Digital Social Innovation: A Responsibility-Sustainability Framework

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Abstract

The role of digital social innovation (DSI) factors linking socially responsible business climate to sustainable performance outcomes in hospitality and tourism businesses has been understudied. This paper introduces digital social innovation within the theoretical framework of relationships between organizational responsibility and sustainable business performance. Using Churchill’s (1979) recommended approach for measurement scale development, the study reports preliminary scale purification results of DSI measures. The paper is among the first contributions to hospitality and tourism scholarship which explore conceptualization, measurement and application of DSI. Implications and next steps for the wider research study on responsibility-DSI-sustainability are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gaggioli A (2017) Digital social innovation. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 20(11):723–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Garriga E, Melé D (2004) Corporate social responsibility theories: mapping the territory. J Bus Ethics 53(1–2):51–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Donaldson T, Dunfee TW (1994) Toward a unified conception of business ethics: integrative social contracts theory. Acad Manag Rev 19(2):252–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Moscardo G, Hughes K (2018) All aboard! Strategies for engaging guests in corporate responsibility programmes. J Sustain Tourism:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  5. Caruana R, Glozer S, Crane A, McCabe S (2014) Tourists’ accounts of responsible tourism. Ann Tour Res 46:115–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Font X, Lynes J (2018) Corporate social responsibility in tourism and hospitality. J Sustain Innov 26(7):1027–1042

    Google Scholar 

  7. McWilliams A, Siegel D (2001) Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective. Acad Manag Rev 26(1):117–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dahlsrud A (2008) How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 15(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pérez A, Martínez P, Del Bosque IR (2013) The development of a stakeholder-based scale for measuring corporate social responsibility in the banking industry. Serv Bus 7(3):459–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hallenga-Brink SC, Brezet JC (2005) The sustainable innovation design diamond for micro-sized enterprises in tourism. J Clean Prod 13(2):141–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Buijtendijk H, Blom J, Vermeer J (2018) Eco-innovation for sustainable tourism transitions as a process of collaborative co-production: the case of a carbon management calculator for the Dutch travel industry. J Sustain Tourism:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cloutier LM, Arcand S, Laviolette EM, Renard L (2017) Collective economic conceptualization of strategic actions by québec cidermakers: a mixed methods-based approach. J Wine Econ 12(4):405–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Windrum P, Schartinger D, Rubalcaba L, Gallouj F, Toivonen M (2016) The co-creation of multi-agent social innovations: a bridge between service and social innovation research. European J Innov Manag 19(2):150–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Horng JS, Hsu H, Tsai CY (2017) An assessment model of corporate social responsibility practice in the tourism industry. J Sustain Tourism:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  15. Eekels J, Roozenburg NF (1991) A methodological comparison of the structures of scientific research and engineering design: their similarities and differences. Des Stud 12(4):197–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosenbloom RS, Marris R (1969) Social innovation in the city; New enterprises for community development. A Collection of Working Papers. Harvard University Program on Technology and Society

    Google Scholar 

  17. Drewe P, Klein JL, Hulsbergen E (eds) (2008) The challenge of social innovation in urban revitalization, vol. 6. Techne Press

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bailey DE, Leonardi PM, Barley SR (2012) The lure of the virtual. Organ Sci 23(5):1485–1504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yoo Y, Boland RJ Jr, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A (2012) Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organ Sci 23(5):1398–1408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Benkler Y (2006) The wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedom. Yale University Press

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lessig L (2008) Remix: making art and commerce thrive in the hybrid economy. Penguin

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zittrain JL (2006) The generative internet. Harv Law Review, 1974–2040

    Google Scholar 

  23. Orlikowski WJ (2007) Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work. Organ Stud 28(9):1435–1448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Orlikowski WJ (2009) The sociomateriality of organisational life: considering technology in management research. Camb J Econ 34(1):125–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Orlikowski WJ, Scott SV (2013) What happens when evaluation goes online? exploring apparatuses of valuation in the travel sector. Organ Sci 25(3):868–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Stokes M, Baeck P, Baker T (2017) What next for digital social innovation. DSI4Europe report. Technical report

    Google Scholar 

  27. Alegre I, Berbegal-Mirabent J (2016) Social innovation success factors: hospitality and tourism social enterprises. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag 28(6):1155–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. McPhee, C., Guimont, D, Lapointe, D. (2016). Editorial: Innovation in Tourism. Technology Innovation Management Review

    Google Scholar 

  29. Churchill GA Jr (1979) A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. J Mark Research:64–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. van der Have RP, Rubalcaba L (2016) Social innovation research: an emerging area of innovation studies? Res Policy 45(9):1923–1935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. NESTA (2013). Digital social innovation. London, UK. Retrieved from https://www.nesta.org.uk/project/digital-social-innovation/

  32. Mak BL (2011) ISO certification in the tour operator sector. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag 23(1):115–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sheldon PJ (1986) The tour operator industry: an analysis. Ann Tour Res 13(3):349–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME (2007) Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Acad Manag J 50(1):25–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge, with appreciation, the role of Island Routes Caribbean Adventures/Sandals Resorts International, in supporting this research study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pauline A. Milwood .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Milwood, P.A., Roehl, W.S. (2019). Towards a Measurement Scale for Digital Social Innovation: A Responsibility-Sustainability Framework. In: Pesonen, J., Neidhardt, J. (eds) Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2019. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05940-8_29

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics