Skip to main content

Perceived Impacts of Artificial Intelligence and Responses to Positive Behaviour Change Intervention

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies have a great potential to aid not only in promoting tourism products and services, but also in influencing responsible travel behaviour to support sustainability. The effectiveness of using AI for positive behaviour change interventions depends on consumers’ attitudes toward AI. This study found three underlying views of AI impacts: Beneficial AI, Destructive AI, and Risky AI. Based on these, three consumer segments were identified: The Laggards, The Aficionados, and The Realists. The first two segments hold opposing views: the former averaging higher in negative impacts, while the latter in positive impacts of AI. The Realists are aware of both benefits and risks of AI. These segments differ in their intention to follow recommendations from AI. It is suggested that mainstream consumers, those belonging to The Realists, are likely to respond positively to AI systems recommending responsible behaviour, signifying the positive role of AI in sustainable tourism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. An M (2017) Artificial intelligence is here-people just don’t realize it. https://research.hubspot.com/artificial-intelligence-is-here. Last accessed: 10 Aug 2018

  2. Krogue K, Larsen G, Parry B (2017) The state of artificial intelligence, 2017: public perceptions of the most disruptive technology (UK Edition). https://uk.insidesales.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/State_of_AI_UK.pdf. Accessed: 10 Aug 2018

  3. Shandwick W (2016) AI-Ready or not: artificial intelligence here we come! What consumers think & What marketers need to know. https://www.webershandwick.com/uploads/news/files/AI-Ready-or-Not-report-Oct12-FINAL.pdf. Accessed: 10 Aug 2018

  4. PwC (2017) Sizing the prize: What’s the real value of ai for your business and how can you capitalise? https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/analytics/assets/pwc-ai-analysis-sizing-the-prize-report.pdf. Last accessed: 10 Aug 2018

  5. Economist (2016) Artificial intelligence in the real world. https://www.eiuperspectives.economist.com/sites/default/files/Artificial_intelligence_in_the_real_world_1.pdf. Last accessed: 10 Aug 2018

  6. Russell S, Dewey D, Tegmark M (2015) Research priorities for robust and beneficial artificial intelligence. AI Mag 36(4):105–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee JD, See KA (2004) Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance. Hum Factors 46(1):40–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tromp N, Hekkert P, Verbeek P-P (2011) Design for socially responsible behavior: a classification of influence based on intended user experience. Des Issues 27(3):3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tussyadiah IP (2017) Technology and behavioral design in tourism. In: Fesenmaier DR, Xiang Z (eds) Design Science in Tourism. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp. 173–191.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42773-7_12

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gretzel U (2011) Intelligent system in tourism: a social science perspective. Ann Tour Res 38(3):757–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tussyadiah IP, Wang D (2016) Tourists’ attitudes toward proactive smartphone systems. J Travel Res, 55(4):493–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287514563168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fast E, Horvitz E (2017) Long-term trends in the public perception of artificial intelligence. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence, Inc.: Menlo Park, CA, pp. 963–969

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brougham D, Haar J (2018) Smart technology, artificial intelligence, robotics, and algorithms (STARA): employees’ perceptions of our future workplace. J Manag Organ 24(2):239–257. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2016.55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tussyadiah IP, Zach FJ, Wang J (2017) Attitude toward autonomous on-demand mobility: the case of self-driving taxi. In: Schegg R, Stangl B (eds) Information and communication technologies in tourism 2017. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp 755–766. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51168-9_54

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Hardcastle SJ, Hagger MS (2015) Psychographic profiling for effective health behavior change interventions. Front Psychol 6:1988. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01988

  16. Morrison PD, Roberts JH, Midgley DF (2004) The nature of lead users and measurement of leading edge status. Res Policy 33(2):351–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schreier M, Oberhauser S, Prügl R (2007) Lead users and the adoption and diffusion of new products: insights from two extreme sports communities. Mark Lett 18(1–2):15–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. De Marez L, Vyncke P, Berte K, Schuurman D, De Moor K (2007) Adopter segments, adoption determinants and mobile marketing. J Target, Measur Anal Mark 16(1):78–95. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jt.5750057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bobbitt LM, Dabholkar PA (2001) Integrating attitudinal theories to understand and predict use of technology-based self-service: the internet as an illustration. Int J Serv Ind Manag 12(5):423–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dabholkar PA, Bagozzi RP (2002) An attitudinal model of technology-based self-service: moderating effects of consumer traits and situational factors. J Acad Mark Sci 30:184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Walker RH, Craig-Lees M, Hecker R, Francis H (2002) Technology-enabled service delivery: an investigation of reasons affecting customer adoption and rejection. Int J Serv Ind Manag 13(1):91–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rogers EM (2003) The diffusion of innovation (5th Ed). Free Press: New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Steenkamp J-BEM, Burgess SM (2002) Optimum stimulation level and exploratory consumer behavior in an emerging consumer market. Int J Res Mark 19(2):131–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tussyadiah IP (2016) The influence of innovativeness on on-site smartphone use among American travelers: implications for context-based push marketing. J Travel Tour Mark 33(6):806–823. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2015.1068263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Im S, Bayus BL, Mason CH (2003) An empirical study of innate consumer innovativeness, personal characteristics, and new-product adoption behavior. J Acad Mark Sci 31(1):61–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tellis GJ, Yin E, Bell S (2004) Global consumer innovativeness: cross-country differences and demographic commonalities. J Int Mark: June 2009, 17(2):1–22

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the University of Surrey’s Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (Pump Priming Fund 2017/2018).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iis Tussyadiah .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tussyadiah, I., Miller, G. (2019). Perceived Impacts of Artificial Intelligence and Responses to Positive Behaviour Change Intervention. In: Pesonen, J., Neidhardt, J. (eds) Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2019. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05940-8_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics