Methodological and Theoretical Constructs

  • Woodrow W. Clark II
  • Michael Fast


The purpose in this chapter is not to discuss all issues of qualitative methodology or to show the different interpretations of what qualitative is and does. The purpose is more to highlight some of the central arguments in our discussion of ontology and epistemology in Part I in relation to methodology and theoretical construction and to raise some of the critical aspects in understanding reality and economic life.


  1. Andersen H, editor. Videnskabsteori og metodelære, Bind 1 and 2. Gylling: Samfundslitteratur; 1990a.Google Scholar
  2. Andersen I, editor. Valg af organisations-sociologiske metoder – et Kombinationsperspektiv. København: Samfundslitteratur; 1990b.Google Scholar
  3. Benson JK. Organizations: a dialectical view. Adm Sci Q. 1977a;22:1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benson JK. Innovation and crises in organizational analysis. In: Benson JK, editor. Organizational analysis – critique and innovation. London: SAGE; 1977b.Google Scholar
  5. Blumer H. Symbolic interaction – perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1969; 1986.Google Scholar
  6. Chomsky N. Rules and representations. New York: Columbia University Press; 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark WW. On formalism, Section Five, Anthropology and education; 1977.Google Scholar
  8. Clark WW II, Demirag I. Regulatory considerations of corporate governance: the case of the California energy crisis. Special issue, Public Manag Rev. 2006.Google Scholar
  9. Heilbroner R. The making of economic society: revised for the 1990s. London: Prentice-Hall International; 1989.Google Scholar
  10. Kvale S. Det kvalitative interview. In: Andersen I, editor. Valg af organisations-sociologiske metoder – et kombinationsperspektiv. København: Samfundslitteratur; 1990a.Google Scholar
  11. Kvale S. Ten standard responses to qualitative research interviews. Aarhus: Aarhus University, Psykologisk Institut; 1990b.Google Scholar
  12. Morgan G, Smircich L. The case for qualitative research. Acad Manag Rev. 1980;5(4):491–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Moustakas C. Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nardi B. A small matter of programming: perspectives on end user computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nardi B, editor. Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1996a.Google Scholar
  16. Nardi B. Studying context: a comparison of activity theory, situated action models and distributed cognition. In: Context and consciousness: activity theory and human computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1996b.Google Scholar
  17. Nelson RR. Capitalism as an engine of progress. Res Policy. 1990. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., North Holland.Google Scholar
  18. Polkinghorne D. Methodology for the human sciences – system of inquiry. Albany: State University of New York Press; 1983.Google Scholar
  19. Schutz A. Hverdagslivets sociologi. København: Hans Reitzel; 1973b.Google Scholar
  20. Silverman D. The theory of organisations. London: Heinemann; 1983.Google Scholar
  21. Suchman L. Plans and situated actions: the problem of human/machine communication. London: Cambridge University Press; 1987.Google Scholar
  22. Susman GI, Evered RD. An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Adm Sci Q. 1978;23:582–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Weber M. The methodology of the social sciences. New York: The Free Press; 1948.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Woodrow W. Clark II
    • 1
  • Michael Fast
    • 2
  1. 1.Pepperdine Graziadio Business School, Los Angeles and MalibuCaliforniaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Business and ManagementAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations