Mead and Blumer: Social Theory and Symbolic Interactionism

  • Woodrow W. Clark II
  • Michael Fast


The discussion of Lifeworld as an alternative in the previous chapter rises in a European context, but late in the nineteenth century, an alternative discussion as well was brought to being at the American universities, especially at the University of Chicago.


  1. Blumer H. A critique of the conventional scientific paradigm: social action: lectures. Berkeley: University of California/Institute for Qualitative Research; 1976c.Google Scholar
  2. Blumer H. The self and social action: lectures. Berkeley: University of California/Institute for Qualitative Research; 1976d.Google Scholar
  3. Blumer H. Symbolic interaction – perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1969; 1986.Google Scholar
  4. Crossley N. Intersubjectivity – the fabric of social becoming. London: SAGE; 1996.Google Scholar
  5. Cuff EC, Payne GCF. Samhällsvetenskapliga perspektiv. Uddevalla: Korpen; 1982.Google Scholar
  6. Delanty G, Strydom P. Philosophies of social science – the classical and contemporary readings. Open University Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  7. Giddens A, Turner JH, editors. Social theory today. Padstow: Polity Press; 1990.Google Scholar
  8. Lübcke P (red.). Politikens filosofi leksikon – Filosofi. Aalborg: Politikens Forlag; 1994a.Google Scholar
  9. Mead GH. Mind, self, & society – from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1962 (1934).Google Scholar
  10. Merleau-Ponty M. The phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1994 (1962).Google Scholar
  11. Parkin F. Max Weber. Sussex: Ellis Horwood Limited; 1982.Google Scholar
  12. Ritzer G. Fundamentale perspektiver i sociologien. Odense: Fremad; 1977.Google Scholar
  13. Rose AM. A systematic summery of symbolic interaction theory. In: Rose A, editor. Human behavior and social processes – an interactionist approach. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1962.Google Scholar
  14. Schutz A. The phenomenology of the social world. London: Heinemann Educational Books; 1972.Google Scholar
  15. Schutz A. Some leading concepts of phenomenology. In: Collected papers I: The problem of social reality. Haag: Matinus Nijhoff; 1973a.Google Scholar
  16. Schutz A. Hverdagslivets sociologi. København: Hans Reitzel; 1973b.Google Scholar
  17. Schutz A. Concepts and theory formation in the social sciences. In: Emmet D, Macintyre A, editors. Sociological theory and philosophical analysis. New York: The Macmillan Company; 1978a.Google Scholar
  18. Singelmann P. Exchange as symbolic interaction: convergences between two theoretical perspectives. Am Sociol Rev. 1972;37(4):414–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tonboe J. Rummets sociologi – kritik af teoretiseringen af den materielle omverdens betydning i den sociologiske og den kulturgeografiske tradition. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag; 1993.Google Scholar
  20. Weber M. The methodology of the social sciences. New York: The Free Press; 1948.Google Scholar
  21. Weber, M: Economy and Society – an outline of interpretive sociology. Bedminister Press, New York, NY 1968.Google Scholar
  22. Weber M. Vetenskap och Politik. Göteborg: Korpen; 1977 & 1991.Google Scholar
  23. Wind HC. Filosofisk hermeneutik. København: Berlingske leksikon bibliotek; 1976.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Woodrow W. Clark II
    • 1
  • Michael Fast
    • 2
  1. 1.Pepperdine Graziadio Business School, Los Angeles and MalibuCaliforniaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Business and ManagementAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations