Skip to main content

Universal Ethics and Biolaw for a Multicultural World

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Biolaw and Policy in the Twenty-First Century

Part of the book series: International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine ((LIME,volume 78))

  • 427 Accesses

Abstract

Diversity is part of what we call being human. We need an integrated cross-cultural approach to ethics . We should never expect all people to balance the same values in the same way all the time. Nevertheless, there are numerous benefits if the same values , or principles , can be used by all people and societies. All human beings are found as members of some society but all accommodate some individualism within a social niche. All societies have ethical norms and some system of ethics . Any international ethical approach to assisting people and systems to making bioethical decisions must consider the biological, social and spiritual origins of humanity. In this fashion, the focus of this chapter is to address the fundamental question of whether or not a common ethical system could be accepted and applied universally as well as what consequences this could have for biolaw .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Derrick, C. (1972). The delicate creation. London: Tom Stacey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuppuswamy, C., Macer, D., Serbulea, M., & Tobin, B. (2007). Is human reproductive cloning inevitable: Future options for UN Governance. Yokohama: United Nations University, Institute of Advanced Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock, J. E. (1979). Gaia—A new look at life on earth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macer, D. R. J. (1994). Bioethics for the people by the people. Christchurch: Eubios Ethics Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macer, D. R. J. (1998). Bioethics is love of life. Christchurch: Eubios Ethics Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1961). On liberty. Reprinted. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morioka, M. (1991). The concept of “Inochi”: A philosophical perspective on the study of life. Nichibunken Japan Review, 83–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai, J. S., Thorheim, C., Dorjderem, A., & Macer, D. R. J. (2010). Universalism and ethical values for the environment. Bangkok: Regional Unit for Social and Human Sciences in Asia and the Pacific (RUSHSAP), UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakamoto, H. (1996). Foundations of East Asian bioethics. Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics, 6, 31–32.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Darryl Macer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Macer, D. (2019). Universal Ethics and Biolaw for a Multicultural World. In: Valdés, E., Lecaros, J. (eds) Biolaw and Policy in the Twenty-First Century. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 78. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05903-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics