Skip to main content

Towards a New Conception of Biolaw

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Biolaw and Policy in the Twenty-First Century

Part of the book series: International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine ((LIME,volume 78))

Abstract

In this chapter, the author attempts to clarify biolaw’s legal scopes by defining it as a new branch of law and a new juridical model , which can guarantee the identification and recognition of biorights in international legal systems through a constitutional reception of international standards on individual subjective rights . In order to do so, the author identifies, defines and criticizes three conceptions of biolaw, which show certain insufficiencies to understand, resolve and regulate the new juridical conflicts arisen by virtue of genetic technologies . In addition, it will be demonstrated how this new conception of biolaw is able to identify new categories of damages caused by biomedical empowerment, such as genetic harm , among others. The above-mentioned will permit several jurisdictions to meet their international obligations in this matter as well as to make those rights effective within the internal jurisdictional contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    An abundant and illustrative collection of texts and articles that endorse the above can be found in La France (2006), Dolgin and Shepherd (2009), Johnson et al. (2009), and Vaughn (2010). For an approach, we could say more personalistic, consult Smith (2012).

References

  • Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2013). Principles of biomedical ethics (7th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyleveld, D., & Brownsword, R. (2000). Legal argumentation in biolaw. In P. Kemp, J. D. Rendtorff, & N. M. Johansen (Eds.), Bioethics and biolaw, Vol I: Judgement of life (pp. 179–218). Copenhagen: Rhodos International Science and Art Publishers & Center for Ethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byk, C. (1994). Le Comité directeur sur la bioéthique. In S. Leone & S. Privitera (Eds.), Diccionario de bioética (pp. 127–141). Palerme: Éd. Oftes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolgin, J. L., & Shepherd, L. L. (2009). Bioethics and the law (2nd ed.). New York: Aspen Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figueroa, G. (2011). Bioderecho. In C. Romeo Casabona (Dir.), Enciclopedia de Bioderecho y Bioética (pp. 146–154). Granada: Comares.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gros Espiell, H. (2011). Bioderecho internacional. In C Romeo Casabona (Dir.), Enciclopedia de Bioderecho y Bioética (pp. 177–187). Granada: Comares.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hottois, G. (1999). Essais de philosophie bioéthique et biopolitique. Paris: Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. H., Krause, J. H., Saver, R. S., & Fretwell Wilson, R. (2009). Health law and bioethics. New York: Aspen Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, P. (2000). Bioethics and law and biolaw in ethics. In P. Kemp, J. D. Rendtorff, & N. M. Johansen (Eds.), Bioethics and biolaw, Vol I: Judgement of life (pp. 63–78). Copenhagen: Rhodos International Science and Art Publishers & Center for Ethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • La France, A. B. (2006). Bioethics: Health care, human rights and the law (2nd ed.). New York: LexisNexis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenoir, N. (2000). Legal argumentation in biolaw. In P. Kemp, J. D. Rendtorff, & N. M. Johasen (Eds.), Bioethics and biolaw, Vol I: Judgement of life (pp. 219–242). Copenhagen: Rhodos International Science and Art Publishers & Center for Ethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rendtorff, J. D., & Kemp, P. (2000). Basic ethical principles in european bioethics and biolaw (Vol. I). Barcelona and Copenhagen: Institut Borjà di Bioètica & Centre for Ethics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romeo Casabona, C. (Dir.). (2011). Enciclopedia de Bioderecho y Bioética. Granada: Comares.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. P. (2012). Law and bioethics. Intersections along the mortal coil. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Valdés, E. (2011). El principio de autonomía en la doctrina del bioderecho. Revista La Lámpara de Diógenes, 22–23, 116–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdés, E. (2012). Bioethical principle: Origins, foundations and problems. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdés, E., & Puentes, L. V. (2014). Daño genético: Definición y doctrina a la luz del bioderecho. Revista de Derecho Público, 32, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, Lewis. (2010). Bioethics: Principles, issues and cases. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erick Valdés .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Valdés, E. (2019). Towards a New Conception of Biolaw. In: Valdés, E., Lecaros, J. (eds) Biolaw and Policy in the Twenty-First Century. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 78. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05903-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics