Biolaw and ‘the Dual-Use Dilemma’: The Freedom of Scientific Research in Relationship with ‘Traditional’ and Emerging Sciences and Technologies
This chapter aims to legally explore the dual-use dilemma, as referred to two areas: one, which is more ‘traditional’, is the field of nuclear science and technology, and the other one, which is a new emerging area, is synthetic biology. One important conclusion will be that the freedom of scientific research, which is central in this context, has to be protected, but at the same time the other rights and freedoms at stake cannot be ‘suppressed’ or ‘sacrificed’.
- Bin, R. (2005). Diritti e fraintendimenti: il nodo della rappresentanza. In AA.VV., Scritti in onore di G.Berti (Vol. I). Napoli: Jovene, pp. 345 ss.Google Scholar
- Browning, C. R. (2005). The origins of the final solution. The evolution of Nazi Jewish policy, September 1939–March 1942. London: Arrow.Google Scholar
- Butler, D., & Ledford, H. (2012). U.S. biosecurity board revises stance on mutant-flu studies. Decision comes one day after release of new guidelines for dual-use research. Nature. Accessed February 21, 2015.Google Scholar
- Chet Tremmel, J. (Ed.). (2006). Handbook of intergenerational justice. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Casonato, C. (2014). Evidence based law, Spunti di riflessione sul diritto comparato delle scienze della vita. Bolaw Journal, Rivista di Biodiritto, 1, 179–207. Google Scholar
- Colussi, I. A. (2014). Synthetic biology and the freedom of scientific research: a fundamental freedom in front of a new emerging technology. Review of Law and Human Genome, Special number, 277–287.Google Scholar
- Dando, M. (2009). Dual-use education for life scientists? Ideas for Peace and Security, Disarmament Forum, 10, 41–44.Google Scholar
- Editorial. (2012). Publishing risky research. Nature, 485(5), 3.Google Scholar
- Enserink, M. (2015). Dutch appeals court dodges decision on hotly debated H5N1 papers. Science. http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/07/dutch-appeals-court-dodges-decision-hotly-debated-h5n1-papers. Accessed February 25, 2015.
- Frosini, T. (Ed.). (2008). Teoremi e problemi di diritto costituzionale. Milano: Giuffré.Google Scholar
- Gostin, L. O., & Lazzarini, Z. (1997). Human Rights and Public Health in the AIDS Pandemic. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Greenfieldboyce, N. (2012). Bird flu scientist has applied for permit to export research. NPR. https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2012/04/24/151292681/bird-flu-scientist-has-applied-for-permit-to-export-research. Accessed March 4, 2015.
- Katz, J. (1972). Experimentation with human beings. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Lauren, P. G. (2003). The evolution of international human rights: Visions seen. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
- Malakoff, D. (2012). Breaking news: NSABB reverses position on flu papers. Science Insider. http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2012/04/breaking-us-accepts-nsabbrecommendation-publish-h5n1-flu-papers. Accessed March 2, 2015.
- Martin, B. (2001). Science: contemporary censorship. In D. Jones (Ed.), Censorship: A world encyclopedia (Vol. 4, pp. 2167–2170). London: Fitzroy Dearborn.Google Scholar
- Merrills, J. E. (2007). Environmental rights. In D. Bodansky, J. Brunnée, & E. Hey (Eds.), Oxford handbook of international environmental law (pp. 663–680). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Michel, Q. (2013). Balancing the Freedom of Academia and Security Interests: An Impossible Objective? Paper presented at the “Non-proliferation versus fundamental rights and scientific freedom - a Debating Forum “Science Meets Practice.” Alpbach.Google Scholar
- Modugno, F. (1995). I «nuovi diritti» nella giurisprudenza costituzionale. Torino: Giappichelli.Google Scholar
- National Research Council. (2004). Biotechnology Research in an Age of Terrorism. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Rhodes, R. (1986). The Making of the Atomic Bomb. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
- Riedel, E. (2009). The Human Right to Health: Conceptual Foundations. https://www.eda.admin.ch/content/dam/eda/en/documents/topics/01_453_Riedel.pdf. Accessed 16 February 2015.
- Romeo Casabona, C. (2011). Bioderecho y Bioética. In C. Romeo Casabona (Dir.), Enciclopedia de Bioderecho y Bioética (pp. 187–205). Granada: Editorial Comares.Google Scholar
- Salvi, M. (2002). What Responsibility for Science. Law and the Human Genome Review, 17, 125–134.Google Scholar
- Santosuosso, A. (2016). Diritto, scienza, nuove tecnologie. Milano: Wolters Kluwer-CEDAM, 297–382.Google Scholar
- Schmidt, M., & Giersch, G. (2011). DNA Synthesis and Security. In M. Campbell (Ed.), DNA microarrays, synthesis and synthetic DNA (pp. 285–300). New York: Nova Publishers.Google Scholar
- Schweber, S. S. (2000). In the shadow of the Bomb: Bethe, Oppenheimer, and the moral responsibility of the scientist. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- UK Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology. (2009). The dual-use dilemma. London: Parliamentary Office.Google Scholar