Abstract
This chapter explores the ways in which a constructionist emphasis on language and embodied activities draws attention to our own participation in maintaining and validating the discourse of stress and the concomitant evaluations that accompany it. The relational focus of the constructionist discourse offers various resources for creating ways of getting on together (Wittgenstein). Discursive options provide resources for action that move us beyond pathology to potential. These resources include specific ways of inviting others to appreciate alternatives, imagine the future, adopt their stories, coordinate multiple beliefs and views, create opportunities for different conversations, and embrace relational responsibility. She studies how such resources transform one’s professional life. Is stress something we “get” or “catch” or “become caught up in?” Or, is stress a way of talking? Our culture has accustomed us to a number of labels, categories, and diagnoses of deficit. We systematically face problems, or threats we might impose upon ourselves or others, or assessments that might affect our future.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Engaging in an archeologyof knowledge (Foucault1972) is to trace a certain social practice or way of talking back to its origins. For example, when did health professionals first start diagnosing workers with stress and (most important) what else was going on at that time, in that context and historical/cultural moment? The assumption is that social practices emerge as “sensible” within the communities that construct them. Yet, over time, a particular practice might lose its utility.
- 2.
Here, I use the term therapeutic in the broadest sense, encompassing any form of diagnosis and treatment.
References
Alexander, B. (2008). The globalization of addiction: A study in poverty of the spirit. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alexander, B. K., Beyerstein, B. L., Hadaway, P. F., & Coambs, R. B. (1981). The effect of early and later colony housing on oral ingestion of morphine in rats. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior,15, 571–576.
Averill, J. R. (1989). Stress as fact and artifact: An inquiry into the social origins and functions of some stress reactions. In C. D. Spielberger, I. G. Sarason, & J. Strelau (Eds.), Stress and anxiety (Vol. 12, pp. 15–38). New York: Hemisphere Publishing Company.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
Foucault, M. (1972). Archeology of knowledge (A. M. Sheridan Smith, Trans.). New York: Pantheon.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Pantheon.
Fruggeri, L., & McNamee, S. (1991). Burnout as social process: A research study. In L. Fruggeri, U. Telfner, A. Castellucci, M. Marzari, & M. Matteini (Eds.), A systemic model for changing mental health service delivery (pp. 1–16). London: Draper Campbell Publishers.
Gergen, K. J. (2009). Relational being: Beyond self and community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hari, J. (2015). Chasing the scream: The first and last days of the war on drugs. New York: Bloomsbury.
Iacovides, A., Fountoulakis, K. N., Kaprinis, S., & Kaprinis, G. (2003). The relationship between job stress, burnout and clinical depression. Journal of Affective Disorders,75(3), 209–221.
McNamee, S. (1996). The discourse of burnout: Social constructionist inquiry. In M. Pakman (Ed.), Construcciones de la experiencia humana (Vol. 2). Barcelona: Gedisa Editorial.
McNamee, S. (2002). The social construction of disorders: From pathology to potential. In J. D. Raskin & S. K. Bridges (Eds.), Studies in meaning: Exploring constructivist psychology (pp. 143–168). New York: Pace University Press.
McNamee, S. (2014). Research as relational practice: Exploring modes of inquiry. In G. Simon & A. Chard (Eds.), Systemic inquiry: Innovations in reflexive practice research (pp. 74–94). London: Everything is Connected Press.
Pearce, W. B. (2007). Making social worlds: A communication perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Rose, N. (1985). The psychological complex: Psychology, politics and society in England 1869–1939. London: Routledge.
Selvini Palazzoli, M., Boscolo, L., Cecchin, G., & Prata, G. (1980). Hypothesizing-circularity-neutrality: Guidelines for the conductor of the session. Family Process,19(1), 3–12.
Szasz, T. (1984). The therapeutic state: Psychiatry in the mirror of current events. New York: Prometheus Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McNamee, S. (2019). The Discourse of Stress: Individual Pathology or Communal Ritual. In: Loriol, M. (eds) Stress and Suffering at Work. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05876-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05876-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05875-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05876-0
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)