Skip to main content

Mechanical Property Characterization of Single Scan Laser Tracks of Nickel Superalloy 625 by Nanoindentation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series ((MMMS))

Abstract

Laser-based additive manufacturing of metals relies on many micro-sized welds to build a part. A simplified, well-studied case of this process is a single scan of the laser across a single layer of powder. However, there is a lack of mechanical property measurements of the tracks produced in such experiments. Nanoindentation measurements on laser track cross sections of nickel superalloy 625 reveal hardness differences between the track melt pool and base material as well as variations with laser scan speed. There is a change from ≈5.5 GPa in the track melt pool to ≈4.8 GPa in the base material for laser settings of 195 W and 800 mm s−1. In comparison, the increase in hardness in the melt pool is not observed for settings of 195 W and 200 mm s−1. It is believed that the difference in thermal histories supported by thermographic measurements causes a difference in the dislocation density in the melt pool . This results in a difference in hardness between the two tracks. The effects of the local crystal orientation, dendritic spacing, and residual stress are considered in the interpretation of results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Certain commercial equipment, instruments, or materials are identified in this paper in order to specify the experimental procedure adequately. Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor is it intended to imply that the materials or equipment identified are necessarily the best available for the purpose.

References

  1. Hussein A, Hao L, Yan C, Everson R (2013) Finite element simulation of the temperature and stress fields in single layers built without-support in selective laser melting. Mater Des (1980–2015) 52:638–647

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Keller T, Lindwall G, Ghosh S, Ma L, Lane BM, Zhang F, Kattner UR, Lass EA, Heigel JC, Idell Y, Williams ME, Allen AJ, Guyer JE, Levine LE (2017) Application of finite element, phase-field, and CALPHAD-based methods to additive manufacturing of Ni-based superalloys. Acta Mater 139:244–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ghosh S, Ma L, Levine LE, Ricker RE, Stoudt MR, Heigel JC, Guyer JE (2018) Single-track melt-pool measurements and microstructures in Inconel 625. JOM 70(6):1011–1016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Montgomery C, Beuth J, Sheridan L, Klingbeil N (2015) Process mapping of Inconel 625 in laser powder bed additive manufacturing. In: Solid freeform fabrication symposium, pp 1195–1204

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heigel JC, Lane BM (2018) Measurement of the melt pool length during single scan tracks in a commercial laser powder bed fusion process. J Manuf Sci Eng 140(5):051012–051012-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Akram J, Chalavadi P, Pal D, Stucker B (2018) Understanding grain evolution in additive manufacturing through modeling. Addit Manuf 21:255–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ma L, Fong J, Lane B, Moylan S, Filliben J, Heckert A, Levine L (2015) Using design of experiments in finite element modeling to identify critical variables for laser powder bed fusion. In: International solid freeform fabrication symposium, laboratory for freeform fabrication and the University of Texas Austin, TX, USA, pp 219–228

    Google Scholar 

  8. Heigel JC, Lane BM (2017) The effect of powder on cooling rate and melt pool length measurements using in situ thermographic techniques. In: Solid freeform fabrication symposium

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hay J, Agee P, Herbert E (2010) Continuous stiffness measurement during instrumented indentation testing. Exp Tech 34(3):86–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Oliver WC, Pharr GM (2004) Measurement of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentation: advances in understanding and refinements to methodology. J Mater Res 19(1):3–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hill R (1952) The elastic behaviour of a crystalline aggregate. Proc Phys Soc Sect A 65(5):349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang Z, Stoica AD, Ma D, Beese AM (2016) Diffraction and single-crystal elastic constants of Inconel 625 at room and elevated temperatures determined by neutron diffraction. Mater Sci Eng A 674:406–412

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Vlassak JJ, Nix WD (1994) Measuring the elastic properties of anisotropic materials by means of indentation experiments. J Mech Phys Solids 42(8):1223–1245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vlassak JJ, Nix WD (1993) Indentation modulus of elastically anisotropic half-spaces. Philos Mag A 67(5):1045–1056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nix WD, Gao HJ (1998) Indentation size effects in crystalline materials: a law for strain gradient plasticity. J Mech Phys Solids 46(3):411–425

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pharr GM, Herbert EG, Gao YF (2010) The indentation size effect: a critical examination of experimental observations and mechanistic interpretations. Annu Rev Mater Res 40:271–292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hosemann P, Shin C, Kiener D (2015) Small scale mechanical testing of irradiated materials. J Mater Res 30(9):1231–1245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tsui TY, Oliver WC, Pharr GM (2011) Influences of stress on the measurement of mechanical properties using nanoindentation: Part I. Experimental studies in an aluminum alloy. J Mater Res 11(3):752–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hou X, Jennett N (2017) A method to separate and quantify the effects of indentation size, residual stress and plastic damage when mapping properties using instrumented indentation. J Phys D Appl Phys 50(45):455304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Read DT, Keller RR, Barbosa N, Geiss R (2007) Nanoindentation round robin on thin film copper on silicon. Metall Mat Trans A 38(13):2242–2248

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Will Osborn and Maureen Williams of the Materials Measurement Laboratory at NIST for their help with EBSD. We are very appreciative of Mark Stoudt of the Materials Measurement Laboratory at NIST for etching samples and discussing the many aspects of additive nickel superalloy 625. We are also grateful of Lyle Levine and Will Osborn of the Materials Measurement Laboratory at NIST for bringing to our attention the need to do these experiments. Meir Kreitman wishes to acknowledge support from the University of Maryland and the NIST Summer Undergraduate Research Fellowship (SURF) program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jordan S. Weaver .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Weaver, J.S., Kreitman, M., Heigel, J.C., Donmez, M.A. (2019). Mechanical Property Characterization of Single Scan Laser Tracks of Nickel Superalloy 625 by Nanoindentation. In: TMS 2019 148th Annual Meeting & Exhibition Supplemental Proceedings. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05861-6_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics