Skip to main content

Collaborative Service Delivery: Catalyst to Innovation in Policy and Practice in Alberta, Canada

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Re-Visioning Public Health Approaches for Protecting Children

Part of the book series: Child Maltreatment ((MALT,volume 9))

Abstract

Canadian child welfare jurisdictions have endeavoured to address the needs of children and families at risk in a manner that keeps pace with the changing Canadian population and context. Since 2000, Alberta, a Western Canadian province, has been an active leader in addressing these legislative, policy and practice challenges. Collaborative Service Delivery (CSD) is one recent, and well documented example of practice change developed in Alberta, and this initiative will be the primary focus of this chapter (Brodziak J, Alberta Asso Serv Child Fam J 3:19–25, 2010; Gardiner S, Hachkowski A, J Serv Child Fam 4(Spring):16–21, 2011; Gardiner S, MacLaurin B, Reeves J, Outcome-based service delivery (OBSD): the process and outcomes of collaboration. In: Badry D, Fuchs D, Montgomery H, McKay S (eds) Reinvesting in families: strengthening child welfare practice for a brighter future: voices from the prairies. University of Regina Press, Regina, 2014). This chapter reviews the historical legislation, policy and practice in Canada and Alberta, emerging and promising child intervention initiatives in Alberta, the larger context of the child intervention practice framework, and the lessons learned from policy and practice changes in Alberta.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alberta Children’s Services. (2006). A new casework practice model. Retrieved from http://www.assembly.ab.ca/lao/library/egovdocs/2006/alchs/155959.pdf

  • Alberta Government. (2004a). Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000, Chapter C-12. Edmonton: Government of Alberta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberta Government. (2004b). Overview of changes to the child, youth and family enhancement act, August, 2004. Edmonton: Queen’s Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberta Government. (2014). Alberta children’s services: Alberta’s child Intervention system. Retrieved from http://humanservices.alberta.ca/abuse-bullying/15403.html

  • Altstein, H., & McRoy, R. (2000). Does family preservation serve a child’s best interests? Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselmo, S., Pickford, R., & Goodman, P. (2003). Alberta response model: Transforming outcomes for children and youth. In N. Trocmé, D. Knoke, & C. Roy (Eds.), Community collaboration and differential response: Canadian and international research and emerging models of Practice. Ottawa: Centre of Excellence for Child Welfare, Child Welfare League of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, A. (1993). The policy and legislative context. In B. Wharf (Ed.), Rethinking child welfare in Canada (pp. 37–63). Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bala, N. (1999). Reforming Ontario’s child and family services act: Is the pendulum swinging back too far? Canadian Family Law Quarterly, 17, 121–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bala, N. (2004). Child welfare law in Canada: An introduction. In N. Bala, M. K. Zapf, R. J. Williams, R. Vogl, & J. P. Hornick (Eds.), Canadian child welfare law (pp. 1–26). Toronto: Thompson Educational Publishing Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, T., Trocmé, N., Fallon, B., & MacLaurin, B. (2008). The Canadian child welfare system response to exposure to domestic violence investigations. Child Abuse and Neglect, 32, 393–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackstock, C. (2011). Wanted: Moral courage in Canadian child welfare. First Peoples Child and Family Review, 6(2), 35–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackstock, C., Trocmé, N., & Bennett, M. (2003). Child welfare response to aboriginal and non-aboriginal children in Canada: A comparative analysis. International symposium on family violence, Montreal, QC.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Columbia Government. (1996). Child, family and community services act. Victoria: Queen’s Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodziak, J. (2010). Outcomes-based·service delivery – On the ground. Alberta Association of Services for Children and Families Journal, 3, 19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumbrill, G. (2006). Ontario’s child welfare transformation: Another swing of the pendulum? Canadian Social Work Review, 23(1/2), 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallon, B., & Trocmé, N. (2011). Factors associated with the decision to provide ongoing services: Are worker characteristics and organization location important? In K. Kufeldt & B. McKenzie (Eds.), Child welfare: Connecting research, policy, and practice (pp. 57–73). Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallon, B., Trocmé, N., & MacLaurin, B. (2011). Should child protection services respond differently to maltreatment, risk of maltreatment, and risk of harm? Child Abuse & Neglect, 35(4), 236–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Provincial Working Group on Child and Family Services Information. (2002). Child welfare in Canada 2000: The role of provincial and territorial authorities in the provision of child protection services. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, E. (1996). Significant harm: Unravelling child protection decisions and substitute care careers of children. Brookfield: Ashgate Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, S., & Hachkowski, A. (2011). Outcome based service delivery: Launching, learning and looking forward. Journal for Services to Children and Families, 4(Spring), 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, S., MacLaurin, B., & Reeves, J. (2014). Outcome-based service delivery (OBSD): The process and outcomes of collaboration. In D. Badry, D. Fuchs, H. Montgomery, & S. McKay (Eds.), Reinvesting in families: Strengthening child welfare practice for a brighter future: Voices from the prairies. Regina: University of Regina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gove, T. J. (1995a). Report of the Gove inquiry into child protection in British Columbia: Mathew’s story – Volume 1. Victoria: British Columbia Ministry of Services to Children and Families.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gove, T. J. (1995b). Report of the Gove inquiry into child protection in British Columbia: Mathew’s legacy – Volume 2. Victoria: British Columbia Ministry of Services to Children and Families.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, E. N. (2006). BC children and youth review: An independent review of BC’s child protection system. Victoria: Minister of Children and Family Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaBoucane-Benson, P., Sherren, N., & Yerichuk, D. (2017). Trauma, child development, healing and resilience: A review of literature with focus on aboriginal peoples and communities. Edmonton: PolicyWise for Children & Families.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLaurin, B. (2002). Historical and contextual factors associated with child welfare decisions in Canada. Calgary: University of Calgary.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLaurin, B., & Bala, N. (2004). Children in care. In N. Bala, M. K. Zapf, R. J. Williams, R. Vogl, & J. P. Hornick (Eds.), Canadian child welfare law (pp. 111–138). Toronto: Thompson Educational Publishing Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLaurin, B. J., Trocmé, N., & Fallon, B. (2003). Characteristics of investigated children and families referred to out-of-home placement. In K. Kufeldt & B. McKenzie (Eds.), Child welfare: Connecting research policy and practice. Waterloo: Wilfred Laurier Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLaurin, B., Trocmé, N., Fallon, B., & Sinha, V. (2014). Urgent response in Alberta: Understanding the implications of 85/15 on policy and practice. Calgary: University of Calgary.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, B. (2011). Differential response in child welfare: A new early intervention model. In K. Kufeldt & B. McKenzie (Eds.), Child welfare: Connecting research, policy and practice (2nd ed.). Waterloo: Wilfred Laurier Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milloy, J. S. (1999). A national crime: The Canadian government and the residential school system (pp. 1879–1986). Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ontario Government. (1996). Child and family services act. Toronto: Queen’s Printer of Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ontario Government. (2000). Child and family services act. Toronto: Queen’s Printer of Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panel of Experts on Child Protection. (1998). Protecting vulnerable children. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Community and Social Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prilleltensky, I., Nelson, G., & Peirson, L. (Eds.). (2001). Promoting family wellness and preventing child maltreatment: Fundamentals for thinking and actions. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provincial and Territorial Directors of Child Welfare, & Rogers, J. (2003). New directions in child welfare. In N. Trocmé, D. Knoke, & C. Roy (Eds.), Community collaboration and differential response: Canadian and international research and emerging models of practice (pp. 1–13). Toronto: Centres of Excellence in Child Welfare.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, M. (2008). Triple P-positive parenting program as a public health approach to strengthening parenting. Journal of Psychology, 22(3), 506–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, V., Trocmé, N., Fallon, B., MacLaurin, B., Fast, E., & Thomas-Prokop, S., et al. (2011). Kiskisik awasisak: Remember the children. Understanding the overrepresentation of First Nations children in the child welfare system. Ontario: Assembly of First Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, V., Trocmé, N., Fallon, B., & MacLaurin, B. (2013). Understanding the investigation-stage overrepresentation of first nations children in the child welfare system: An analysis of the first nations component of the Canadian incidence study of reported child abuse and neglect 2008. Child Abuse & Neglect, 37, 821–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spicer, K. (2016). Child intervention practice framework implementation: Executive leadership needs assessment. Retrieved from: http://dspace.library.uvic.ca:8080/bitstream/handle/1828/7366/Spicer_Kim_MPA_2016.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

  • Spratt, T. (2001). The influence of child protection orientation on child welfare practice. British Journal of Social Work, 31, 933–954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trocmé, N. (1997). Staying on track while the pendulum swings: Commentary on canadian child welfare policy trends. OACAS Newsmagazine, (Winter), 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trocmé, N., McPhee, D., Tam, K. K., & Hay, T. (1994). Ontario incidence study of reported child abuse and neglect (1993). Toronto: Institute for the Prevention of Child Abuse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trocmé, N., MacLaurin, B., & Fallon, B. (2000). Canadian child welfare outcomes indicator matrix: An ecological approach to tracking service outcomes. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, and Trauma, 4(1), 165–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trocmé, N., MacLaurin, B., Fallon, B., Daciuk, J., Billingsley, D., & Tourigny, M. (2001). Canadian incidence study of reported child abuse and neglect: Methodology. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 92(4), 259–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trocmé, N., Fallon, B., MacLaurin, B., & Neves, T. (2005). What is driving increased child welfare caseloads in Canada? Analysis of the 1993 and 1998 Ontario incidence studies of reported child abuse and neglect. Child Welfare, 84(3), 341–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trocmé, N., MacLaurin, B., et al. (2006). Mesnmimk Wasatek – Catching a drop of light: Understanding the overrepresentation of first nations children in Canada’s child welfare system: An analysis of the Canadian incidence study of reported child abuse and neglect (CIS-2003). Toronto: Centres of Excellence for Child Welfare.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trocmé, N., MacLaurin, B., Fallon, B., Shlonsky, A., Mulcahy, M., & Esposito, T. (2009). National child welfare outcomes indicator matrix (NOM). Montreal: McGill University: Centre for Research on Children and Families.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trocmé, N., Fallon, B., MacLaurin, B., Sinha, V., Black, T., Fast, E., & Holroyd, J. (2010). Rates of maltreatment-related investigations in the CIS-1998, CIS- 2003, and CIS-2008. In Public Health Agency of Canada (Ed.), Canadian incidence study of reported child abuse and neglect – 2008: Major findings. Ottawa: Public Health Agency of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trocmé, N., Kyte, A., Sinha, V., & Fallon, B. (2014). Urgent protection versus chronic need: Clarifying the dual mandate of child welfare services across Canada. Social Sciences, 3, 483–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. (2015). Honouring the truth, reconciling the future: Summary of the final report of the truth and reconciliation commission. Ottawa: Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnell, A., Munro, E., & Murphy, T. (2013). Soft is hardest: Leading for learning in child protection services following a child fatality. Child Welfare, 92(2), 199–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child. (1990). United nations convention on the rights of the child. Geneva: Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldfogel, J. (1998). Future of child protection: How to break the cycle of abuse and neglect. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2006). Preventing child maltreatment: A guide to taking action and generating evidence. Geneva: WHO press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rhonda Barraclough .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Barraclough, R., Spicer, K., Brodziak, J., Green, K., MacLaurin, B. (2019). Collaborative Service Delivery: Catalyst to Innovation in Policy and Practice in Alberta, Canada. In: Lonne, B., Scott, D., Higgins, D., Herrenkohl, T.I. (eds) Re-Visioning Public Health Approaches for Protecting Children. Child Maltreatment, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05858-6_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05858-6_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05857-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05858-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics