Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Off-Task Media Use in Lectures: Towards a Theory of Determinants

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
ICT Education (SACLA 2018)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 963))

Abstract

A growing body of evidence indicates that university students frequently engage in off-task media use (OTMU) during lectures. While the bulk of research in this area has considered the frequency and impact of such behaviour, little work concerning the subjective and contextual factors that determine OTMU in academic settings has been conducted. In this study we adopt a qualitative approach to consider the determinants of this behaviour. Seven key factors that determine students’ OTMU in lectures are identified: OTMU policy, OTMU norms, Fear of missing out, Grit, Control over technology, Quality of lecture, and Visibility of peers’ OTMU. We propose a model which specifies the relationships between these factors and discuss how institutions and lecturers can navigate the challenges posed by OTMU in lectures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The university is currently ranked among the top 400 on the 2017/2018 Times Higher Education World University Rankings.

  2. 2.

    Our use of the term ‘academic setting’ is inclusive of formal lecture environments, practical or tutorial classes, group work settings or personal study sessions.

  3. 3.

    Reaching over 3000 students, from first to third year in three faculties.

  4. 4.

    Ethical clearance for the study was granted by the institution’s research ethics board. Prior to the commencement of the focus groups each participant provided informed consent, in full knowledge of the study procedures, the voluntary nature of their participation, data protection measures, and reporting confidentiality.

  5. 5.

    Note, for instance, the newest legislation on this matter in France, 2018.

References

  1. Aagaard, J.: Drawn to distraction: a qualitative study of off-task use of educational technology. Comput. Educ. 87, 90–97 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ajzen, I.: From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl, J., Beckmann, J. (eds.) Action Control. SSSSP, pp. 11–39. Springer, Heidelberg (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Annan-Coultas, B.D.L.: Laptops as instructional tools: student perceptions. TechTrends 56(5), 34–42 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Babbie, E.: The Practice of Social Research, 13th edn. Cengage, Boston (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beland, L.P., Murphy, R.: Ill communication: technology, distraction & student performance. Labour Econ. 41, 61–76 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Berger, P.: Beyond plain acceptance or sheer resistance: a typology of university instructors’ attitudes to students’ media use in class. Teach. Teach. Educ. 67, 410–417 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Blackburn, K., Lefebvre, L., Richardson, E.: Technological task interruptions in the classroom. Fla. Commun. J. Technol. Interruptions XLI (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Thematic analysis revised. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3(2), 77–101 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheever, N.A., Rosen, L.D., Carrier, L.M., Chavez, A.: Out of sight is not out of mind: the impact of restricting wireless mobile device use on anxiety levels among low, moderate and high users. Comput. Hum. Behav. 37, 290–297 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Duckworth, A.L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M.D., Kelly, D.R.: Grit: perseverance and passion for long-term goals. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 92(6), 1087–1101 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Elliott, R., Fischer, C.T., Rennie, D.L.: Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 38, 215–229 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. Taylor & Francis, Milton Park (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Flanigan, A.E., Babchuk, W.A.: Social media as academic quicksand: a phenomenological study of student experiences in and out of the classroom. Learn. Individ. Differ. 44, 40–45 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Flanigan, A.E., Kiewra, K.A.: What college instructors can do about student cyber-slacking. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 30(2), 585–597 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fried, C.B.: In-class laptop use and its effects on student learning. Comput. Educ. 50(3), 906–914 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine, Chicago (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Guo, Z., Tan, F.B., Cheung, K.: Students’ uses and gratifications for using computer-mediated communication media in learning contexts. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 27(1), 339–378 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jacobsen, W.C., Forste, R.: The wired generation: academic and social outcomes of electronic media use among university students. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 14(5), 275–280 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Junco, R.: In-class multitasking and academic performance. Comput. Hum. Behav. 28(6), 2236–2243 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Junco, R., Cotten, S.: A decade of distraction? How multitasking affects student outcomes. In: Proceedings of Symposium on the Dynamics of the Internet and Society, pp. 1–38. Oxford Internet Institute (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kitzinger, J.: Qualitative research: introducing focus groups. B. M. J. 311(7000), 299–302 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Leysens, J.L., le Roux, D.B., Parry, D.A.: Can I have your attention, please? An empirical investigation of media multitasking during university lectures. In: SAICSIT 2016 Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists, Paper #21 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mason, J.: Qualitative Researching. SAGE, Newcastle upon Tyne (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Morgan, D.: Focus groups as qualitative research. Qual. Res. Methods Ser. 16(2), 6–17 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  25. North, D., Johnston, K., Ophoff, J.: The use of mobile phones by South African university students. Issues Informing Sci. Inf. Technol. 11, 115–138 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Parry, D.A.: The digitally-mediated study experiences of undergraduate students in South Africa. M.-Thesis, Stellenbosch University (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Parry, D.A., le Roux, D.B.: In-lecture media use and academic performance: investigating demographic and intentional moderators. S. Afr. Comput. J. 30(1), 85–107 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Przybylski, A.K., Murayama, K., Dehaan, C.R., Gladwell, V.: Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(4), 1841–1848 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Reno, R.R., Cialdini, R.B., Kallgren, C.A.: The transsituational influence of social norms. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 64(1), 104–112 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., McMaughton-Nichols, C., Ormston, R.: Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. SAGE, Newcastle upon Tyne (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Roberts, N., Rees, M.: Student use of mobile devices in university lectures. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 30(4), 415–426 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rosen, L.D., Carrier, M., Cheever, N.A.: Facebook and texting made me do it: media-induced task-switching while studying. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(3), 948–958 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rosen, L.D., Whaling, K., Rab, S., Carrier, L.M., Cheever, N.A.: Is Facebook creating ‘iDisorders’? The link between clinical symptoms of psychiatric disorders and technology use, attitudes and anxiety. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(3), 1243–1254 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. le Roux, D.B., Parry, D.A.: A new generation of students: digital media in academic contexts. CCIS 730, 19–36 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  35. le Roux, D.B., Parry, D.A.: In-lecture media use and academic performance: does subject area matter? Comput. Hum. Behav. 77, 86–94 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sana, F., Weston, T., Cepeda, N.J.: Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers. Comput. Educ. 62, 24–31 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sapacz, M., Rockman, G., Clark, J.: Are we addicted to our cell phones? Comput. Hum. Behav. 57, 153–159 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. van der Schuur, W., Baumgartner, S.E., Sumter, S.R., Valkenburg, P.M.: The consequences of media multitasking for youth: a review. Comput. Hum. Behav. 53, 204–215 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Strauss, V.: Why a leading professor of new media just banned technology use in class. Technical report (2014). https://goo.gl/hzejkd

  40. Taneja, A., Fiore, V., Fischer, B.: Cyber-slacking in the classroom: potential for digital distraction in the new age. Comput. Educ. 82, 141–151 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Twining, P., Heller, R., Nussbaum, M., Tsai, C.: Some guidance on conducting and reporting qualitative studies. Comput. Educ. 106, 1–9 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Williams, J.A., Cox, D.: I got distracted by their being distracted. East. Educ. J. 40(1), 48–56 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Zhang, W., Zhang, L.: Explicating multitasking with computers: gratifications and situations. Comput. Hum. Behav. 28(5), 1883–1891 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Science, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa

    Douglas A. Parry & Daniel B. le Roux

Authors
  1. Douglas A. Parry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel B. le Roux
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas A. Parry .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Systems, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

    Salah Kabanda

  2. Computer Science, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town, South Africa

    Hussein Suleman

  3. University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa

    Stefan Gruner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Parry, D.A., le Roux, D.B. (2019). Off-Task Media Use in Lectures: Towards a Theory of Determinants. In: Kabanda, S., Suleman, H., Gruner, S. (eds) ICT Education. SACLA 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 963. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05813-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05813-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05812-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05813-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation