Skip to main content

Qualifications and Skill Levels of Digital Forensics Practitioners in South Africa: An Exploratory Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
ICT Education (SACLA 2018)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 963))

Abstract

Digital forensic investigations require competence in skills associated with an investigation which is often measured through qualifications consisting of scholastic education, digital forensic training, digital forensic certification, and digital forensics work-related experience. While prior research has been conducted into the qualifications of digital forensic practitioners within the South African environment, the association between qualifications and measures of skill has not been addressed. This research study utilises a conceptual research framework to test the association between qualifications and the skills levels of digital forensic practitioners in South Africa. The findings show that continuous training and the level of testimony provided by a digital forensics practitioner in a civil or criminal procedure are positively associated with overall skills level. Other factors such as formal education, number of forensics training courses, certification, and work-related experience did not have a direct association with the measured skill. Further research is hence needed to understand the role of these factors in improving skill levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    www.qualtrics.com.

  2. 2.

    The research project was approved by our university and complied with the institutionally prescribed codes of ethics.

  3. 3.

    In South Africa the ‘Honours’ degree is an extension of the Bachelor degree which enables a student to commence with Master-studies thereafter. It is thus similar to the final study-year of the (longer) U.S. American Bachelor curriculum.

  4. 4.

    Such advancement might even be expected to motivate educational innovation in tertiary-academic digital forensics courses: see for example [19].

References

  1. Bhattacherjee, A.: Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices, 2nd edn. University of South Florida Press, Gainesville (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bloom, B.S., Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., Krathwohl, D.R.: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. David McKay Company, Philadelphia (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carlton, G., Worthley, R.: Identifying a computer forensics expert: a study to measure the characteristics of forensic computer examiners. J. Dig. Forensic Secur. Law 5(1), 5–19 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carrier, B.D., Spafford, E.H.: An event-based digital forensic investigation framework. In: Proceedings of Digital Forensic Research Workshop, pp. 11–13 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Department of Higher Education and Training: Organising Framework for Occupations (OFO), Guideline No. 2013, p. 33, South Africa (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Department Justice and Constitutional Development: Courts in South Africa. Governm. Communic. http://www.justice.gov.za/about/sa-courts.html

  7. European Network of Forensic Science Institutes: Guidelines for Best Practice in the Forensic Examination of Digital Technology. In: Best Practice Guide 6(FIT-2005-001), p. 30 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Foit, D., Vukalović, J., Hausknecht, K.: Competencies and Skills needed for Digital Forensic Trainer. In: MIPRO 2015 Proceedings of 38th IEEE International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics, pp. 1376–1381 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grobler, M.: Digital forensic standards: international progress. In: SAISMC 2010 Proceedings of South African Information Security Multi-Conference, pp. 216–271 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Harichandran, V.S., Breitinger, F., Baggili, I., Marrington, A.: A cyber forensics needs analysis survey: revisiting the domain’s needs a decade later. Comp. Secur. 57, 1–13 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. INFOSEC: Computer Forensics Investigator. https://www.infosecinstitute.com/career-profiles/computer-forensics-investigator

  12. IOS: Information Technology – Security Techniques – Investigation Principles and Processes. Standard ISO/IEC 27043:2015 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jordaan, J.: A Sample of Digital Forensic Quality Assurance in the South African Criminal Justice System. In: ISSA 2012 Proceedings International Information Security for South Africa Conference (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jordaan, J.: An Examination of Validation Practices in relation to the Forensic Acquisition of Digital Evidence in South Africa. M.-Diss., Rhodes Univ. (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jordaan, J., Bradshaw, K.: The current state of digital forensic practitioners in South Africa. In: ISSA 2015 Proceedings of International Information Security for South Africa Conference (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Köhn, M.D., Eloff, M.M., Eloff, J.H.P.: Integrated digital forensic process model. Comp. Secur. 38, 103–115 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kruse, W.G., Heiser, J.G.: Computer Forensics: Incident Response Essentials. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Laykin, E.: Investigative Computer Forensics: The Practical Guide for Lawyers, Accountants, Investigators, and Business Executives. Wiley, Hoboken (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Leung, W.S.: Cheap latex, high-end thrills: a fantasy exercise in search and seizure. In: Liebenberg, J., Gruner, S. (eds.) SACLA 2017. CCIS, vol. 730, pp. 265–277. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69670-6_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu, H.: Comparing Welch’s ANOVA, a Kruskal-Wallis Test and Traditional ANOVA in case of Heterogeneity of Variance. M.-Diss., Virginia Commonwealth Univ. (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lunn, D.A.: Computer Forensics – An Overview. Technical report, SANS Inst., (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Manca, F.: Why Do We Need to Measure Skills Better? Better Indicators for Better Policies! Technical report (2013). https://oecdskillsandwork.wordpress.com/2015/12/04/why-do-we-need-to-measure-skills-better-better-indicators-for-better-policies/

  23. McKemmish, R.: When is digital evidence forensically sound? In: Ray, I., Shenoi, S. (eds.) DigitalForensics 2008. ITIFIP, vol. 285, pp. 3–15. Springer, Boston, MA (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-84927-0_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Minister of Justice and Correctional Services: Republic of South Africa Cybercrimes and Cybersecurity Bill (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  25. National Research Council: Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward. National Academies Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Republic of South Africa: National Qualifications Framework Act 67 of 2008. Government Gazette 32233(25) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rogers, M.K., Seigfried, K.: The future of computer forensics: a needs analysis survey. Comp. Secur. 23(1), 12–16 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Saunders, M.N.K., Lewis, P., Thornhill, A.: Research Methods for Business Students, 7th edn. Pearson, London (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Squire, D.: Understanding the Organising Framework for Occupations. Technical report (2012). https://www.skillsportal.co.za/content/understanding-organising-framework-occupations

  30. Srinivasan, S.: Digital forensics curriculum in security education. J. Inf. Technol. Educ. 12, 147–157 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Stander, A., Johnston, K.: The need for and contents of a course in forensic information systems and computer science at the University of Cape Town. Informing Sci.: Int. J. Emerg. Transdiscipl. 4(1), 63–72 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Taylor, C., Endicott-Popovsky, B., Phillips, A.: Forensics education: assessment and measures of excellence. In: SADFE 2007 Proceedings of 2nd International Workshop on Systematic Approaches to Digital Forensic Engineering, pp. 155–165 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  33. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime: Staff Skill Requirements and Equipment Recommendations for Forensic Science Laboratories (No. ST/NAR/2/ REV.1), p. 138, UNO (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Valjarevic, A., Venter, H.S.: A comprehensive and harmonized digital forensic investigation process model. J. Forensic Sci. 60(6), 1467–1483 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Valjarevic, A., Venter, H.S.: Harmonised digital forensic investigation process model. In: ISSA 2012 Proceedings International Information Security for South Africa Conference (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Valli, C.: Establishing a vendor neutral skills based framework for digital forensics curriculum development and competence assessment. In: Proceedings of Australian Digital Forensics Conference (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mannis Stenvert .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Stenvert, M., Brown, I. (2019). Qualifications and Skill Levels of Digital Forensics Practitioners in South Africa: An Exploratory Study. In: Kabanda, S., Suleman, H., Gruner, S. (eds) ICT Education. SACLA 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 963. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05813-5_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05813-5_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05812-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05813-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics