Abstract
This chapter investigates the role of the national interest in the context of EU State aid law and policy. Its aim is to identify, analyse and evaluate the interaction between national industrial policy preferences and the policies that EU State aid law allows Member States to pursue through State intervention. In doing so, it seeks to address the following key questions: to what extent are national preferences subsumed in the notion of “common interest”? What scope does State aid law allow for the pursuit of industrial policy at EU and at national level? Does State aid policy promote a certain kind of industrial policy?
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
For a thorough dismissal of the first claim, see Biondi and Tarrant (2017).
- 2.
Judgment of 22 December 2008, British Aggregates v Commission, C-487/06 P, EU:C:2008:757, paragraph 111.
- 3.
Judgment of 24 July 2003, Altmark Trans and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg, C-280/00, EU:C:2003:415.
- 4.
SA.33984 (12/N) Green Investment Bank, [2012] OJ C370/02.
- 5.
Inter alia, Judgment of 17 March 1993, Sloman Neptun v Bodo Ziesemer, C-72/91 and C-73/91, EU:C:1993:97; Judgment of 30 November 1993, Kirsammer-Hack, C-189/91, EU:C:1993:907; Judgment of 7 May 1998, Viscido et al., C-52/97, C-53/97 and C-54/97, EU:C:1998:209.
- 6.
Judgment of 13 March 2001, PreussenElektra, C-379/98, EU:C:2001:160.
- 7.
Judgment of 19 December 2013, Association Vent De Colère! and Others, C-262/12, EU:C:2013:851.
- 8.
Judgment of 10 May 2016, Germany v Commission, T-47/15, EU:T:2016:281.
- 9.
For a comprehensive treatment of this principle and the various tests that emanate from it, see Cyndecka (2016).
- 10.
Judgment of 11 September 2012, Corsica Ferries, T-565/08, EU:T:2012:415, paragraphs 79–84.
- 11.
Judgment of 6 September 2006, Portugal v Commission, C-88/03, EU:C:2006:511.
- 12.
Judgment of 8 November 2001, Adria-Wien Pipeline, C-143/99, EU:C:2001:598.
- 13.
Proposal for appropriate measures under Article 93(1) of the EC Treaty concerning Irish corporation tax, [1998] OJ C395/09.
- 14.
Commission Decision (EU) 2016/2326 of 21 October 2015 on State aid SA.38375 (2014/C ex 2014/NN) which Luxembourg granted to Fiat, [2016] OJ L 351/1.
- 15.
Commission Decision (EU) 2017/502 of 21 October 2015 on State aid SA.38374 (2014/C ex 2014/NN) implemented by the Netherlands to Starbucks, [2017] OJ L 83/38.
- 16.
Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1283 on State aid SA.38373 (2014/C) (ex 2014/NN) (ex 2014/CP) implemented by Ireland to Apple, [2017] OJ L 187/1.
- 17.
Commission Decision of 4.10.2017 on State aid SA.38944 (2014/C) (ex 2014/NN) implemented by Luxembourg to Amazon, C(2017) 6740 final.
- 18.
Judgment of 17 September 1980, Philip Morris, 730/79, EU:C:1980:209, paragraph 14.
- 19.
Judgment of 24 February 1987, Deufil v Commission, 310/85, EU:C:1987:96, paragraph 18; Judgment of 29 April 2004, Italy v Commission, C-372/97, EU:C:2004:234, paragraph 83.
- 20.
Judgment of 7 June 2001, Agrana Zucker v Commission, T-187/99, EU:T:2001:149, paragraph 56.
- 21.
Judgment of 30 September 2016, Tadej Kotnik and Others v Slovenia, C-526/14, EU:C:2016:570, paragraph 40.
- 22.
Ibid. paragraph 41.
- 23.
Commission Regulation (EU) 651/2014 of 17 June 2014 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty, [2014] OJ L187/1.
- 24.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 of 6 August 2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty, [2008] OJ L 214/3.
- 25.
Commission Decision (EU) 2015/658 of 8 October 2014 on the aid measure SA.34947 (2013/C) (ex 2013/N) which the United Kingdom is planning to implement for support to the Hinkley Point C nuclear power station, [2014] OJ L109/44. The decision has been (unsuccessfully) impugned by Austria in Case T-356/15 Austria v Commission EU:T:2018:439.
- 26.
See the argument made in Sanchez-Graells’ Chapter in this volume regarding EU procurement law.
- 27.
The decision has been challenged by Austria.
References
Aghion, P., Boulanger, J., & Cohen, E. (2011). Rethinking industrial policy. Policy Briefs, Bruegel. Retrieved January 10, 2018, from https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bre:polbrf:566
Aghion, P., Dewatripont, M., Du, L., Harrison, A., & Legros, P. (2012). Industrial policy and competition. NBER Working Paper Series, No. 18048.
Arrighi, G. (2004). The long twentieth century: Money, power, and the origins of our times. London: Verso.
Biondi, A., & Righini, E. (2015). An evolutionary theory of State aid control. In D. Chalmers & A. Arnull (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of European Union law (pp. 670–697). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Biondi, A., & Tarrant, A. (2017). EU State aid law and British assumptions: A reality check. Renewal: A Journal of Social Democracy. Retrieved November 20, 2017, from http://renewal.org.uk/blog/eu-law-is-no-barrier-to-labours-economic-programme
Bird & Bird. (2015). Final Study Report. State aid support schemes for RDI in the EU’s international competitors in the fields of Science, Research and Innovation. Retrieved October 25, 2017, from https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/news/state-aid-support-schemes-rdi-eus-international-competitors-fields-science-research-and
Chang, H.-J. (2003). Kicking away the ladder: Infant industry promotion in historical perspective. Oxford Development Studies, 31, 21–32.
Clift, B., & Woll, C. (2012). Economic patriotism: Reinventing control over open markets. Journal of European Public Policy, 19, 307–323.
Cyndecka, M. (2016). The market economy investor test in EU State aid law. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.
David, P. A., Hall, B. H., & Toole, A. A. (2000). Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy, 29, 497–529.
Dewatripont, M., & Seabright, P. (2006). “Wasteful” public spending and State aid control. Journal of the European Economic Association, 4, 513–522.
Englmaier, F., & Stowasser, T. (2017). Electoral cycles in savings bank lending. Journal of the European Economic Association, 15, 296–354.
European Commission. (1972). First Report on Competition Policy (annexed to the “Fifth General report on the Activities of the Communities”). Brussels and Luxembourg: European Commission.
European Commission. (2005). State Aid Action Plan. Less and better targeted State aid: A road map for State aid reform 2005–2009 COM(2005) 107 final.
European Commission. (2010). EUROPE 2020 A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth COM(2010) 2020 final.
European Commission. (2012). Communication from the Commission – EU State Aid Modernisation (SAM) COM(2012) 209 final.
European Commission. (2014a). Framework for State aid for research and development and innovation, [2014] OJ C198/01.
European Commission. (2014b). Communication from the Commission – Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy 2014–2020, [2014] OJ C200/1.
European Commission. (2016a). Results, trends and observations regarding EU28 State Aid expenditure reports for 2015. Retrieved November 20, 2017, from http://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/scoreboard/technical_note_en.pdf
European Commission. (2016b). Commission notice on the notion of State aid as referred to in Article 107(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, [2016] OJ C262/1.
European Council. (2005). Presidency Conclusions – Brussels, 22 and 23 March 2005 7619/05. Retrieved September 12, 2018, from http://www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/ec/84335.pdf
European Court of Auditors. (2011). Special Report 15/2011, “Do the Commission’s procedures ensure effective management of State aid control?”. Retrieved November 20, 2017, from https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/8a4f2415-fa15-4e6e-a95e-6fb64c119df4
Galletti, G. M. (2015). How reasonable a private investor can be assumed to be? Common Market Law Review, 52, 1095–1110.
Hancher, L., & Nicolaides, P. (2017). Compatibility of aid – General introduction. In P. Werner & V. Verouden (Eds.), EU State aid control – Law and economics (pp. 87–107). Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.
Koenig, C., & von Wendland, B. (2017). The art of regulation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Moser, S., Pesaresi, N., & Soukup, K. (2002). State guarantees to German public banks: A new step in the enforcement of State aid discipline to financial services in the community. EC Competition Policy Newsletter, 2, 1–11.
Nicolaides, P. (2017). State aid to banking: Application of the market economy investor principle. In F.-C. Laprévote, J. Gray, & F. de Cecco (Eds.), Research handbook on State aid in the banking sector (pp. 87–107). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Spaak Report. (1956). Report of the Heads of Delegations to the Foreign Ministers at the Messina Conference, 21 April 1956. Abridged English translation. Retrieved January 12, 2018, from http://aei.pitt.edu/id/eprint/995
Van de Casteele, K. (2016). General Block Exemption Regulation. In L. Hancher, T. Ottervanger, & P. J. Slot (Eds.), EU State aids (pp. 363–378). London: Sweet & Maxwell.
Varju, M., & Papp, M. (2016). The crisis, national economic particularism and EU law: What can we learn from the Hungarian case? Common Market Law Review, 53, 1647–1674.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Cecco, F. (2019). Member State Interests in EU State Aid Law and Policy. In: Varju, M. (eds) Between Compliance and Particularism. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05782-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05782-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05781-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05782-4
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)